3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1323-1341

  Fedorov, Andriy ^a   Beichel, Reinhard ^b   Kalpathy Cramer, Jayashree ^c   Finet, Julien ^d   Fillion Robin, Jean Christophe ^d   Pujol, Sonia ^a   Bauer, Christian ^b   Jennings, Dominique ^c   Fennessy, Fiona ^a   Sonka, Milan ^b   Buatti, John ^b   Aylward, Stephen ^d   Miller, James V ^e   Pieper, Steve ^f   Kikinis, Ron ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d KITWARE INC   (United States)

^e GE GLOBAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^f Isomics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Cancer imaging; Cancer treatment response; CT; Glioblastima; Head and neck; Image analysis; Imaging biomarkers; Medical imaging; MRI; PET; Prostate; Quantitative imaging; Software tools

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING NETWORK; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AUTOMATION; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GLIOBLASTOMA; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84867140087     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61(2):69-90.
2. Park J.W., Kerbel R.S., Kelloff G.J., Barrett J.C., Chabner B.A., Parkinson D.R., et al. Rationale for biomarkers and surrogate end points in mechanism-driven oncology drug development. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10(11):3885-3896.
3. Jeraj R., Cao Y., Ten Haken R.K., Hahn C., Marks L. Imaging for assessment of radiation-induced normal tissue effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 76(3 Suppl):S140-S144.
4. Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 2009 January;45(2):228-247.
5. Jaffe T.A., Wickersham N.W., Sullivan D.C. Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: part 1, radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(1):101-106.
6. Clarke L.P., Croft B.S., Nordstrom R., Zhang H., Kelloff G., Tatum J. Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy. Transl Oncol 2009, 2(4):195-197.
7. Gering DT. A System for Surgical Planning and Guidance using Image Fusion and Interventional MR. 1999:106.
8. Grimson E., Leventon M., Ettinger G., Chabrerie A., Ozlen F., Nakajima S., et al. Clinical experience with a high precision image-guided neurosurgery system. Proc of MICCAI'98 1998, Vol. 1496:63-73. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. W.M. Wells, A. Colchester, S. Delp (Eds.).
9. Gering D.T., Nabavi A., Kikinis R., Hata N., O'Donnell L.J., Grimson W.E., et al. An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13(6):967-975.
10. Tempany C., Straus S., Hata N., Haker S. MR-guided prostate interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27(2):356-367.
11. Golby A.J., Kindlmann G., Norton I., Yarmarkovich A., Pieper S., Kikinis R. Interactive diffusion tensor tractography visualization for neurosurgical planning. Neurosurgery 2011, 68(2):496-505.
12. Caskey C.F., Hlawitschka M., Qin S., Mahakian L.M., Cardiff R.D., Boone J.M., et al. An open environment CT-US fusion for tissue segmentation during interventional guidance. PLoS One 2011, 6(11):e27372.
13. Frisardi G., Chessa G., Barone S., Paoli A., Razionale A., Frisardi F. Integration of 3D anatomical data obtained by CT imaging and 3D optical scanning for computer aided implant surgery. BMC Med Imaging 2011, 11(1):5.
14. Uneri A., Schafer S., Mirota D.J., Nithiananthan S., Otake Y., Taylor R.H., et al. TREK: an integrated system architecture for intraoperative cone-beam CT-guided surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011, 7(1):159-173.
15. Reed S. Is there an astronomer in the house?. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2011, 331(6018):696-697.
16. Fedorov A., Li X., Pohl K.M., Bouix S., Styner M., Addicott M., et al. Atlas-guided segmentation of vervet monkey brain MRI. Open Neuroimaging J 2011, 5:186-197.
17. Yeo C.T., Ungi T., U-Thainual P., Lasso A., McGraw R.C., Fichtinger G. The effect of augmented reality training on percutaneous needle placement in spinal facet joint injections. IEEE Trans Bio-Medical Eng 2011, 58(7):2031-2037.
18. Xu H, Gage HD, Santago P. An open source implementation of colon CAD in 3D slicer. In: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7624.; 2010. pp. 762421-762421-9.
19. Washko G.R., Hunninghake G.M., Fernandez I.E., Nishino M., Okajima Y., Yamashiro T., et al. Lung volumes and emphysema in smokers with interstitial lung abnormalities. N Engl J Med 2011, 364(10):897-906.
20. Chen D.Q., Quan J., Guha A., Tymianski M., Mikulis D., Hodaie M. Three-dimensional in vivo modeling of vestibular schwannomas and surrounding cranial nerves with diffusion imaging tractography. Neurosurgery 2011, 68(4):1077-1083.
21. Vatta F., Di Salle F. Brain morphometry in autism spectrum disorders: a unified approach for structure-specific statistical analysis of neuroimaging data - Biomed 2011. Biomed Sci Instrum 2011, 47:135-141.
22. Ashburner J. Computational anatomy with the SPM software. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27(8):1163-1174.
23. Yushkevich P.A., Hazlett H.C., Smith R.G., Ho S., Gee J.C., Gerig G. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006, 31(3):1116-1128.
24. Jiang H., van Zijl P.C.M., Kim J., Pearlson G.D., Mori S. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006, 81(2):106-116.
25. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E.J., Johansen-Berg H., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-S219.
26. Rosset A., Spadola L., Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004, 17(3):205-216.
27. McAuliffe M.J., Lalonde F.M., McGarry D., Gandler W., Csaky K., Trus B.L. Medical image processing, analysis and visualization in clinical research. Proceedings 14th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2001. IEEE Comput. Soc 2001, 381-386.
28. Barboriak D.P., Padua A.O., York G.E., Macfall J.R. Creation of DICOM-aware applications using Image J. J Digit Imaging 2005, 18(2):91-99.
29. Liao W, Deserno TM, Spitzer K. Evaluation of free non-diagnostic DICOM software tools. In: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 6919. SPIE; 2008. pp. 691903-691903-12.
30. Walter T., Shattuck D.W., Baldock R., Bastin M.E., Carpenter A.E., Duce S., et al. Visualization of image data from cells to organisms. Nat Methods 2010, 7(3 Suppl):S26-S41.
31. Rubin D.L., Mongkolwat P., Kleper V., Supekar K., Channin D.S. Annotation and image markup: accessing and interoperating with the semantic content in medical imaging. IEEE Intelligent Syst 2009, 24(1):57-65.
32. Channin D.S., Mongkolwat P., Kleper V., Sepukar K., Rubin D.L. The caBIG annotation and image markup project. J Digit Imaging 2010, 23(2):217-225.
33. Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer. In: Proc. of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2004.; 2004. pp. 632-635.
34. Mildenberger P., Eichelberg M., Martin E. Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol 2002, 12(4):920-927.
35. Pieper S, Lorensen B, Schroeder W, Kikinis R. The NA-MIC Kit: ITK, VTK, Pipelines, Grids and 3D Slicer as An Open Platform for the Medical Image Computing Community. In: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano, 2006. IEEE; 2006. pp. 698-701.
36. Ibanez L, Schroeder W. The ITK Software Guide 2.4. Kitware, Inc. 2005 p. 804.
37. Estépar R.S.J., Stylopoulos N., Ellis R., Samset E., Westin C.-F., Thompson C., et al. Towards scarless surgery: an endoscopic ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures. Comput Aided Surg 2007, 12(6):311-324.
38. Perona P., Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1990, 12(7):629-639.
39. Tustison N.J., Avants B.B., Cook P.A., Zheng Y., Egan A., Yushkevich P.A., et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010, 29(6):1310-1320.
40. Horn B.K.P., Hilden H.M., Negahdaripour S. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. J Opt Soc Am 1988, 5(7):1127-1135.
41. Wells W.M., Viola P., Atsumi H., Nakajima S., Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996 March, 1(1):35-51.
42. Mattes D., Haynor D.R., Vesselle H., Lewellen T.K., Eubank W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22(1):120-128.
43. Karasev P, Malcolm J, Niethammer M, Kikinis R, Tannenbaum A. User-driven 3D mesh region targeting. Imaging. 2010;7625:762513-762513-8.
44. Pichon E., Tannenbaum A., Kikinis R. A statistically based flow for image segmentation. Med Image Anal 2004, 8(3):267-274.
45. Gao Y., Tannenbaum A., Kikinis R. Medical computer vision. Recognition techniques and applications in medical imaging 2011, 195-203. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin. B. Menze, G. Langs, Z. Tu, A. Criminisi (Eds.).
46. Veeraraghavan H, Miller JV. Active learning guided interactions for consistent image segmentation with reduced user interactions. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. IEEE; 2011. pp. 1645-1648.
47. Wells W.M., Grimson W.L., Kikinis R., Jolesz F.A. Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996, 15(4):429-442.
48. Pohl K.M., Bouix S., Nakamura M., Rohlfing T., McCarley R.W., Kikinis R., et al. A hierarchical algorithm for MR brain image parcellation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26(9):1201-1212.
49. Basser P.J., Pajevic S., Pierpaoli C., Duda J., Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2000, 44(4):625-632.
50. Tokuda J., Fischer G.S., Papademetris X., Yaniv Z., Ibanez L., Cheng P., et al. OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. 2009, 5(4):423-434.
51. Oliphant T.E. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 2007, 9(3):10-20.
52. Eads D., Rosten E. Experiences using SciPy for computer vision research. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference 2008, 22-26. (SciPy).
53. Pierson R., Johnson H., Harris G., Keefe H., Paulsen J.S., Andreasen N.C., et al. Fully automated analysis using BRAINS: AutoWorkup. Neuroimage 2011, 54(1):328-336.
54. Gorgolewski K., Burns C.D., Madison C., Clark D., Halchenko Y.O., Waskom M.L., et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in Python. Front Neuroinformatics 2011, 5(August):15.
55. Turkbey B., Pinto P.A., Mani H., Bernardo M., Pang Y., McKinney Y.L., et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010, 255(1):89-99.
56. Hoeks C.M.A., Barentsz J.O., Hambrock T., Yakar D., Somford D.M., Heijmink S.W., et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011, 261(1):46-66.
57. Fennessy F., Gupta S.N., Fedorov A., Mulkern R., Tang Y., Franco F., et al. A comparison between arterial input function approaches for high temporal resolution pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer at 3.0T. ISMRM 2011, Vol. 17:3064.
58. Fennessy F., Fedorov A., Gupta S.N., Wells W., Mulkern R.V., Tempany C.M. Assessment of abnormal ADC matched voxels with DCE parameters for characterization of prostate cancer at 3T. ISMRM 2012, Vol. 2.
59. Fedorov A., Tuncali K., Fennessy F., Tokuda J., Hata N., Wells S., et al. Hierarchical image registration for improved sampling during 3T MRI-guided transperineal targeted prostate biopsy. ISMRM 2011, Vol. 29:3055.
60. Fedorov A., Ibanez L., Tuncali K., Mulkern R.V., Wells W.M., Tempany C., et al. Deformable registration for recovering image distortions in DWI MRI of the prostate at 3T. ISMRM 2012, Vol. 256.
61. Clunie D.A. DICOM structured reporting and cancer clinical trials results. Cancer Inf 2007, 4:33-56.
62. Wahl R.L., Jacene H., Kasamon Y., Lodge M.A. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 1):122S-150S.
63. Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 1(Suppl_1)):11S-20S.
64. Tomasi G., Turkheimer F., Aboagye E. Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future. Mol Imaging Biol 2011, 13:1-16.
65. Scott B.J., Quant E.C., McNamara M.B., Ryg P.A., Batchelor T.T., Wen P.Y. Bevacizumab salvage therapy following progression in high-grade glioma patients treated with VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Neuro Oncol 2010, 12(6):603-607.
66. FDA. Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee - briefing information for the March 31, 2009 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2009.
67. Sorensen A.G., Batchelor T.T., Zhang W.-T., Chen P.-J., Yeo P., Wang M., et al. A "vascular normalization index" as potential mechanistic biomarker to predict survival after a single dose of cediranib in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Cancer Res 2009, 69(13):5296-5300.
68. Macdonald D., Cascino T., Schold S., Cairncross J. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 1990, 8(7):1277-1280.
69. Wen P.Y., Macdonald D.R., Reardon D.A., Cloughesy T.F., Sorensen A.G., Galanis E., et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28(11):1963-1972.