Shape variation in outline shapes

Systematic Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 134-146

  McCane, Brendan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Morphometrics; outline analysis; semilandmark

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871839282     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys080     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams D., Rohlf F., Slice D. 2004. Geometricmorphometrics: ten years of progress "following the revolution". Ital. J. Zool. 71:5-16.
2. Bookstein F. 1996. Shape and the information in medical images: a decade of the morphometric synthesis. Proceedings of the Workshop onMathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis; 1996; San Francisco (CA): IEEE. p. 2-12.
3. Bookstein F. 1997a. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1:225-243.
4. Bookstein F. 1997b. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
5. Davies R., Twining C., Cootes T., Waterton J., Taylor C. 2002. 3D statistical shape models using direct optimisation of description length. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. p. 1-17. Vol. 2352 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Copenhagen, Denmark, p. 3-20.
6. Dryden I., Mardia K. 1998. Statistical shape analysis, Vol. 4. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Dworkin I., Gibson G. 2006. Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-{beta} signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173:1417.
8. Edwards K., Doescher L., Kaneshiro K., Yamamoto D. 2007. Adatabase of wing diversity in the Hawaiian Drosophila. PLoS One 2:e487.
9. Ennos A. 1989. Comparative functional morphology of the wings of diptera. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 96:27-47.
10. Ferson S., Rohlf F., Koehn R. 1985. Measuring shape variation of twodimensional outlines. Syst. Biol. 34:59-68.
11. Fritsch F., Carlson R. 1980. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17(2):238-246.
12. Gower J. 1975. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51.
13. Gower J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338.
14. Gunz P., Mitteroecker P., Bookstein F. 2005. Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In: Slice Dennis E., editor. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. p. 73-98.
15. Hyman J. 1983. Accuratemonotonicity preserving cubic interpolation. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 4:645.
16. Kendall D. G., Barden D., Carne T. K., Le H. 2008. Shape and shape theory, Vol. 11. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
17. Klingenberg C. 2008. Novelty and "homology-free" morphometrics: whats in a name Evol. Biol. 35:186-190.
18. Klingenberg C., Zaklan S. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:1273-1285.
19. Kruskal J. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1-27.
20. Kuhl F., Giardina C. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput. Graph. Image process. 18:236-258.
21. MacLeod N. 1999. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25(1): 107-138.
22. McCane B., Kean M. 2011. Integration of parts in the facial skeleton and cervical vertebrae. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 139:e13-e30.
23. Sampson P., Bookstein F., Sheehan F., Bolson E., Marcus L., Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G., Slice D. 1996. Eigenshape analysis of left ventricular outlines from contrast ventriculograms. Adv. Morphometrics 284:131-152.
24. Schölkopf B., Smola A., Müller K. 1997. Kernel principal component analysis. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Vol. 1327 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Lausanne, Switzerland, p. 583-588.
25. Srivastava A., Klassen E., Joshi S., Jermyn I. 2011. Shape analysis of elastic curves in euclidean spaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33(7):1415-1428.
26. Tagare H. 2002. Shape-based nonrigid correspondence with application to heart motion analysis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18:570-579.
27. Thompson D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
28. Wootton R. 1992. Functional morphology of insect wings. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:113-140.