Evolution of Multiple Additive Loci Caused Divergence between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea in Wing Rowing during Male Courtship

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Cande, Jessica ^a   Andolfatto, Peter ^b   Prud'homme, Benjamin ^a   Stern, David L ^b,c   Gompel, Nicolas ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA; FLYING; GENE LOCUS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; MOVEMENT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WING;

DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA;

EID: 84865598586     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043888     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. West-Eberhard MJ, (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58: 155-183.
2. Martins EP, editor (1996) Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. 432p.
3. Williams TM, Carroll SB, (2009) Genetic and molecular insights into the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism. Nat Rev Genet 10: 797-804.
4. Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S, (2009) Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457: 818-823.
5. Levine M, Davidson EH, (2005) Gene regulatory networks for development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4936-4942.
6. Gould F, Estock M, Hillier NK, Powell B, Groot AT, et al. (2010) Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 8660-8665.
7. Ellison CK, Wiley C, Shaw KL, (2011) The genetics of speciation: genes of small effect underlie sexual isolation in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. J Evol Biol 24: 1110-1119.
8. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Neill RJ, et al. (2006) Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 6575-6580.
9. Gleason JM, Ritchie MG, (2004) Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL? Genetics 166: 1303-1311.
10. Manoli DS, Foss M, Villella A, Taylor BJ, Hall JC, et al. (2005) Male-specific fruitless specifies the neural substrates of Drosophila courtship behaviour. Nature 436: 395-400.
11. Yapici N, Kim YJ, Ribeiro C, Dickson BJ, (2008) A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour. Nature 451: 33-37.
12. Clark AG, Eisen MB, Smith DR, Bergman CM, Oliver B, et al. (2007) Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450: 203-218.
13. Andolfatto P, Davison D, Erezyilmaz D, Hu TT, Mast J, et al. (2011) Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Res 21: 610-617.
14. Horn C, Wimmer EA, (2000) A versatile vector set for animal transgenesis. Dev Genes Evol 210: 630-637.
15. Holtzman S, Miller D, Eisman R, Kuwayama H, Niimi T, et al. (2010) Transgenic tools for members of the genus Drosophila with sequenced genomes. Fly (Austin) 4: 349-362.
16. Bock IR, Wheeler MR, (1972) The Drosophila melanogaster species group. Univ Texas Publs Stud Genet 7 (7123): 1-102.
17. Lemeunier F, Ashburner MA, (1976) Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 193: 275-294.
18. Ashburner M (1989) Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1331 p.
19. Orgogozo V, Stern DL, (2009) How different are recently diverged species?: more than 150 phenotypic differences have been reported for the D. melanogaster species subgroup. Fly (Austin) 3: 117.
20. Hall JC, (1994) The mating of a fly. Science 264: 1702-1714.
21. Lasbleiz C, Ferveur JF, Everaerts C, (2006) Courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster revisited. Anim Behav 72: 1001-1012.
22. Spieth HT, (1952) Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 99: 399-474.
23. Cowling DE, Burnet B, (1981) Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim Behav 29: 924-935.
24. Lachaise D, Harry M, Solignac M, Lemeunier F, Benassi V, et al. (2000) Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Sao Tome. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267: 1487-1495.
25. Llopart A, Elwyn S, Lachaise D, Coyne JA, (2002) Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution 56: 2262-2277.
26. Carbone MA, Llopart A, DeAngelis M, Coyne JA, Mackay TFC, (2005) Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics 171: 211-225.
27. Rebeiz M, Ramos-Womack M, Jeong S, Andolfatto P, Werner T, et al. (2009) Evolution of the tan locus contributed to pigment loss in Drosophila santomea: a response to Matute et al. Cell 139: 1189-1196.
28. Mas F, Jallon JM, (2005) Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. J Chem Ecol 31: 2747-2752.
29. Ritchie MG, Blyth JE, Lachaise D, (2008) Divergence in multiple courtship song traits between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba. Ethology 114: 728-736.
30. Moehring AJ, Llopart A, Elwyn S, Coyne JA, Mackay TFC, (2006) The genetic basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to hybrid male sterility. Genetics 173: 225-233.
31. Cobb M, Burnet B, Blizard R, Jallon JM, (1989) Courtship in Drosophila sechellia- Its structure, functional aspects, and relationship to those of other members of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. J Insect Behav 2: 63-89.
32. Cobb M, Connolly K, Burnet B, (1985) Courtship behavior in the Melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila. Behaviour 95: 203-231.
33. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK, (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83 (4): 363-372.
34. Haley CS, Knott SA, (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315-324.
35. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA, (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889-890.
36. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. SunderlandMA,: Sinauer Associates. 980 p.
37. Orgogozo V, Broman KW, Stern DL, (2006) High-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping reveals sign epistasis controlling ovariole number between two Drosophila species. Genetics 173: 197-205.
38. Williams MA, Blouin AG, Noor MA, (2001) Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity 86: 68-77.
39. Shaw KL, Lesnick SC, (2009) Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 9737-9742.
40. Moehring AJ, Li J, Schug MD, Smith SG, deAngelis M, et al. (2004) Quantitative trait loci for sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 167: 1265-1274.
41. Moehring AJ, Llopart A, Elwyn S, Coyne JA, Mackay TF, (2006) The genetic basis of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to mating preference. Genetics 173: 215-223.
42. Rueppell O, (2009) Characterization of quantitative trait loci for the age of first foraging in honey bee workers. Behav Genet 39: 541-553.
43. Edwards AC, Mackay TF, (2009) Quantitative trait loci for aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 182: 889-897.
44. Nosil P, Funk DJ, Ortiz-Barrientos D, (2009) Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol Ecol 18: 375-402.
45. Feder JL, Roethele FB, Filchak K, Niedbalski J, Romero-Severson J, (2003) Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 163: 939-953.
46. Schafer MA, Mazzi D, Klappert K, Kauranen H, Vieira J, et al. (2010) A microsatellite linkage map for Drosophila montana shows large variation in recombination rates, and a courtship song trait maps to an area of low recombination. J Evol Biol 23: 518-527.
47. Kitano J, Ross JA, Mori S, Kume M, Jones FC, et al. (2009) A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461: 1079-1083.
48. Gleason JM, Nuzhdin SV, Ritchie MG, (2002) Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89: 1-6.
49. Lagisz M, Wen SY, Routtu J, Klappert K, Mazzi D, et al. (2012) Two distinct genomic regions, harbouring the period and fruitless genes, affect male courtship song in Drosophila montana. Heredity 108: 602-608.
50. Gleason JM, James RA, Wicker-Thomas C, Ritchie MG, (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females. Heredity 103: 416-424.
51. Beavis WD (1994) The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. Washington, DC. American Seed Trade Association. pp. 250-266.
52. Noor MA, Cunningham AL, Larkin JC, (2001) Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genetics 159: 581-588.
53. McGregor AP, Orgogozo V, Delon I, Zanet J, Srinivasan DG, et al. (2007) Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene. Nature 448: 587-590.
54. Bachtrog D, Thornton K, Clark A, Andolfatto P, (2006) Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group. Evolution 60: 292-302.
55. Prud'homme B, Gompel N, Rokas A, Kassner VA, Williams TM, et al. (2006) Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature 440: 1050-1053.