Lines of least resistance and genetic architecture of house mouse (Mus musculus) mandible shape

Evolution and Development

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 197-204

  Boell, Louis ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; RODENT; SURVEYING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EPISTASIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MANDIBLE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; MUTATION; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC VARIATION; MANDIBLE; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MUS MUSCULUS;

EID: 84876803009     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12033     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Atchley, W. R. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. 66: 101-157.
2. Atchley, W. R., Plummer, A. A., and Riska, B. 1985. Genetics of mandible form in the mouse. Genetics 111: 555-577.
3. Badyaev, A. V., and Foresman, K. R. 2000. Extreme environmental change and evolution: stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary diversification in shrew mandibles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 371-377.
4. Badyaev, A. V., and Hill, G. E. 2000. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch: I. Population divergence in morphological covariance structure. Evolution 54: 1784-1794.
5. Bailey, D. W. 1985. Genes that affect the shape of the murine mandible. J. Hered. 76: 107-114.
6. Boell, L., and Tautz, D. 2011. Micro-evolutionary divergence patterns of mandible shapes in wild house mouse (Mus musculus) populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 306.
7. Boell, L., Gregorova, S., Forejt, J., and Tautz, D. 2011. A comparative assessment of mandible shape in a consomic strain panel of the house mouse (Mus musculus)-implications for epistasis and evolvability of quantitative traits. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 309.
8. Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D., and Blows, M. W. 2010. The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence. Am. Nat. 175: 186-196.
9. Cheverud, J. M., Routman, E. J., and Irschick, D. J. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51: 2006-2016.
10. Debat, V., and David, P. 2001. Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 555-561.
11. Ganong, W. F. 1901. The cardinal principles of morphology. Bot. Gaz. 6: 426-434.
12. Guénet, J.-L., and Bonhomme, F. 2003. Wild mice: an ever increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 19: 24-31.
13. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., and Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4: 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
14. Hansen, T. F., and Houle, D. 2008. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1201-1219.
15. Hardouin, E. A., et al. 2010. House mouse colonization patterns on the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen Archipelago suggest singular primary invasions and resilience against re-invasion. BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 325.
16. Houle, D. 1998. How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 102/103: 241-253.
17. Jarvis, J. P., and Cheverud, J. M. 2009. Epistasis and the evolutionary dynamics of measured genotypic values during simulated bottlenecks. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1658-1668.
18. Klingenberg, C. P., Leamy, L. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
19. Leamy, L. J., Klingenberg, C. P., Sherratt, E., Wolf, J. B., and Cheverud, J. M. 2008. A search for quantitative trait loci exhibiting imprinting effects on mouse mandible size and shape. Heredity 101: 518-526.
20. Lofsvold, D. 1988. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. II. Analysis of selection and drift. Evolution 42: 54-67.
21. Mackay, T. F. C. 2010. Mutations and quantitative genetic variation: lessons from Drosophila. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 1229-1239.
22. Mackay, T. F. C., Lyman, R. F., and Lawrence, F. 2005. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 170: 1732-1735.
23. McGuigan, K. 2006. Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics. Mol. Ecol. 15: 883-896.
24. McGuigan, K., Chenoweth, S. F., and Blows, M. W. 2005. Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am. Nat. 165: 32-43.
25. Monteiro, L. R., Bonato, V., and dos Reis, S. F. 2005. Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Evol. Dev. 7: 429-439.
26. Piglicucci, M. 2006. Genetic variance-covariance matrices: a critique of the evolutionary quantitative genetics research program. Biol. Philos. 21: 1-23.
27. Renaud, S., and Auffray, J.-C. 2009. Adaptation and plasticity in insular evolution of the house mouse mandible. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 48: 138-150.
28. Renaud, S., Auffray, J.-C., and Michaux, M. 2006. Conserved phenotypic variation patterns, evolution along lines of least resistance, and departures due to selection in fossil rodents. Evolution 60: 1701-1717.
29. Renaud, S., Auffray, J.-C., and de la Porte, S. 2010. Epigenetic effects on the mouse mandible: common features and discrepancies in remodeling due to muscular dystrophy and response to food consistency. BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 28.
30. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774.
31. Shibata, S., Suda, N., Suzuki, S., Fukuoka, H., and Yamashita, Y. 2006. An in situ hybridization study of Runx2, Osterix, and Sox9 at the onset of condylar cartilage formation in fetal mouse mandible. J. Anat. 208: 169-177.
32. Siahsarvie, R., et al. 2012. Patterns of morphological evolution in the mandible of the house mouse Mus musculus (Rodentia: Muridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 635-647.
33. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Wagner, G. P., Booth, G., and Bagheri-Chaichian, H. 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51: 329-347.
35. Wilkins, A. S. 1997. Canalization: a molecular genetic perspective. BioEssays 19: 257-262.