Citizen Adoption of E-Government Services: Exploring Citizen Perceptions of Online Services in the United States and United Kingdom

Information Systems Management

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 124-140

  Carter, Lemuria ^a   Weerakkody, Vishanth ^b   Phillips, Brandis ^c   Dwivedi, Yogesh K ^d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative research; e government; IT diffusion and adoption; user acceptance of IT

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

COMPARATIVE RESEARCH; E-GOVERNMENT ADOPTIONS; E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES; E-GOVERNMENTS; IT DIFFUSION; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; USER ACCEPTANCE OF IT;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84964765622     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2016.1155948     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. J.F.Affisco,, & K.S.Soliman, (2006). E-government: A strategic operations management framework for service delivery. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 13–21. doi:10.1108/14637150610643724
2. I.Ajzen,, & M.Fishbein, (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–9. doi:10.1037/h0031930
3. A.M.Aladwani, (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of Kuwaiti and British citizens’ views of e-government interface quality. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.003
4. M.Al-Sebie,, & Z.Irani, (2005). Technical and organisational challenges facing transactional e-government systems: An empirical study. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(3), 247–276. doi:10.1504/EG.2005.007778
5. S.Al-Shafi,, & V.Weerakkody, (2008, May). Adoption of wireless internet parks: An empirical study in Qatar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Al Bostan Rotana, Dubai, UAE.
6. C.Barbara, (2008). International legal personality: Panacea or pandemonium? Theorizing about the individual and the state in the era of globalization. Saarbrücken, Germany: DM Verlag Dr. Müller.
7. D.Barclay,, C.Higgins,, & R.Thompson, (1995). The partial least squares approach to casual modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–323.
8. M.Becerra,, & A.K.Gupta, (2003). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 32–44. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.32.12815
9. F.Bélanger,, & L.Carter, (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
10. F.Bélanger,, & L.Carter, (2012). Digitizing government interaction with constituents: E-government research in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 363–394.
11. I.Benbasat,, & H.Barki, (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 7.
12. M.Bernardo,, F.Marimon,, & M.Del Mar Alonso-Almeida, (2012). Functional quality and hedonic quality: A study of the dimensions of e-service quality in online travel agencies. Information & Management, 49(7), 342–347. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.06.005
13. P.Beynon-Davies,, & S.Martin, (2004). Electronic local government and the modernisation agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement. Local Government Studies, 30(2), 214–229. doi:10.1080/0300303042000267245
14. J.K.Burgoon,, J.A.Bonito,, A.Ramirez,, N.E.Dunbar,, K.Kam,, & J.Fischer, (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657–677. doi:10.1111/jcom.2002.52.issue-3
15. L.Carter,, & F.Bélanger, (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. doi:10.1111/isj.2005.15.issue-1
16. L.Carter,, & V.Weerakkody, (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6
17. W.W.Chin, (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. In G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18. J.Choudrie,, & Y.K.Dwivedi, (2005). The demographics of broadband residential consumers in a British local community: The London borough of Hillingdon. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 93–101.
19. M.Chow,, D.K.Herold,, T.Choo,, & K.Chan, (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136–1144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011
20. COMSCORE. (2011). comScore releases overview of European internet usage in September 2011. Press release on November 4, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2011/11/comScore-Releases-Overview-of-European-Internet-Usage-in-September-2011
21. R.Connolly,, & F.Bannister, (2007). Consumer trust in internet shopping in Ireland: Towards the development of a more effective trust measurement instrument. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 102–118. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000071
22. D.Cook, (2007). ACSI commentary: Federal government scores. Retrieved from http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?id=176and_option=com_contentand_task=view
23. C.L.Corritore,, B.Kracher,, & S.Wiedenbeck, (2003). On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737–758. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7
24. J.W.Cresswell, (2003). Research design. Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. M.Cross, (2007). 5 m e-government awareness campaign flops. The Guardian. Published online October 12, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/oct/12/marketingandpr.newmedia
26. F.Cruz-Jesus,, T.Oliveira,, & F.Bacao, (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278–291. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.09.003
27. F.D.Davis, (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
28. S.Devaraj,, R.F.Easley,, & J.M.Crant, (2008). Research note-how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 93–105. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0153
29. A.Dickinger,, M.Arami,, & D.Meyer, (2008). The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 4–11. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000726
30. P.Dunleavy,, H.Margetts,, S.Bastow,, & J.Tinkler, (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
31. Y.K.Dwivedi,, & J.Kuljis, (2008). Profile of IS research published in the European Journal of Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 678–693. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.57
32. Y.K.Dwivedi,, & B.Lal, (2007). Socio-economic determinants of broadband adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5), 654–671. doi:10.1108/02635570710750417
33. Y.K.Dwivedi,, A.Papazafeiropoulou,, H.Gharavi,, & K.Khoumbati, (2006). Examining the socio-economic determinants of adoption of the “Government Gateway” initiative in the UK. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(4), 404–419. doi:10.1504/EG.2006.010801
34. Y.K.Dwivedi,, & M.D.Williams, (2008). Demographic influence on UK citizens’e-government adoption. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(3), 261–274. doi:10.1504/EG.2008.018874
35. T.Elliman,, O.D.Sarikas,, & V.Weerakkody, (2007). Realising integrated e-government services: A UK local government perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(2), 153–173. doi:10.1108/17506160710751986
36. European Union. (2004) United Nations global e-government readiness report 2004—towards access for opportunity. Retrieved from www.gov.uk.
37. M.S.Featherman,, & P.A.Pavlou, (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
38. D.P.Ford,, C.E.Connelly,, & D.B.Meister, (2003). Information systems research and Hofstede’s culture’s consequences: An uneasy and incomplete partnership. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 50(1), 8–25. doi:10.1109/TEM.2002.808265
39. C.Fornell, (1981). A comparative analysis of two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to market data Working paper. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
40. C.Fornell,, & D.F.Larcker, (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
41. T.L.Friedman, (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Grioux.
42. R.B.Gallupe,, & F.B.Tan, (1999). A research manifesto for global information management. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 7(3), 5–18. doi:10.4018/JGIM
43. S.Ganesan, (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 1–19. 58 doi:10.2307/1252265
44. S.Ganesan,, & R.Hess, (1997). Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 439–448. doi:10.1023/A:1007955514781
45. D.Gefen,, E.Karahanna,, & D.W.Straub, (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
46. D.Gefen,, D.W.Straub,, & M.Boudreau, (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
47. M.A.Gharawi,, T.A.Pardo,, & S.Guerrero, (2009, November). Issues and strategies for conducting cross-national e-government comparative research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Bogota, Colombia.
48. D.Gilbert,, P.Balestrini,, & D.Littleboy, (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301. doi:10.1108/09513550410539794
49. S.Grazioli,, & S.L.Jarvenpaa, (2000). Perils of internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4), 395–410. doi:10.1109/3468.852434
50. R.Hackney,, & S.Jones, (2002). Towards e-Government in the Welsh (UK): Assembly, an information systems evaluation. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School.
51. J.F.Harris,, & J.Schwarz, (2000, June 22). Anti drug website track visitors. Washington Post, p. A23.
52. K.Hayakawa,, T.Machikita,, & F.Kimura, (2012). Globalization and productivity: A survey of firm-level analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 332–350. doi:10.1111/joes.2012.26.issue-2
53. N.Helbig,, S.S.Dawes,, F.H.Mulki,, J.L.Hrdinová,, M.E.Cook,, & T.Edwards, (2009). International digital government research: A reconnaissance study (1994–2008) UPDATED. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.
54. T.Herath,, R.Chen,, J.Wang,, K.Banjara,, J.Wilbur,, & H.R.Rao, (2014). Security services as coping mechanisms: An investigation into user intention to adopt an email authentication service. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 61–84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00420.x
55. G.H.Hofstede, (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. C.W.Holsapple,, & S.Sasidharan, (2005). The dynamics of trust in B2C e-commerce: A research model and agenda. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 3(4), 377–403. doi:10.1007/s10257-005-0022-5
57. W.Hong,, J.Y.L.Thong,, L.C.Chasalow,, & G.Dhillon, (2011). User acceptance of agile information systems: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 235–272. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280108
58. Z.Huang, (2007). A comprehensive analysis of US counties’e-government portals: Development status and functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 149–164. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000675
59. Z.Irani,, Y.K.Dwivedi,, & M.D.Williams, (2009). Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(10), 1322–1334. doi:10.1057/jors.2008.100
60. Z.Irani,, T.Elliman,, & P.Jackson, (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327–335. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000698
61. Z.Irani,, P.Love,, & S.Jones, (2008). Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.005
62. S.L.Jarvenpaa,, N.Tractinsky,, & L.Saarinen, (1999). Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 5(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x
63. M.M.Kamal,, V.Weerakkody,, & S.Jones, (2009). The case of EAI in facilitating e-government services in a Welsh authority. International Journal of Information Management, 29(2), 161–165. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.12.002
64. M.Keil,, B.C.Y.Tan,, K.Wei,, T.Saarinen,, V.Tuunainen,, & A.Wassenaar, (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24, 299–325. doi:10.2307/3250940
65. M.Khalifa,, S.K.N.Cheng,, & K.N.Shen, (2012). Adoption of mobile commerce: A confidence model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(1), 14–22.
66. V.Khayun,, P.Ractham,, & D.Firpo, (2012). Assessing e-excise success with Delone and Mclean’s model. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 31.
67. C.S.K.Lai,, & G.Pires, (2009, September). Testing of a model evaluating e-Government portal acceptance and satisfaction. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden.
68. K.Layne,, & J.Lee, (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
69. M.Lee,, & E.Turban, (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91.
70. S.M.Lee,, X.Tan,, & S.Trimi, (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 99–104. doi:10.1145/1089107
71. X.Li,, T.J.Hess,, & J.S.Valacich, (2008). Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 39–71. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001
72. W.-K.Lim,, S.K.Sia,, & A.Yeow, (2011). Managing risks in a falling IT project: A social constructionist view. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(6), 414–440.
73. Y.Lu,, Z.Deng,, & B.Wang, (2010). Exploring factors affecting Chinese consumers’ usage of short message service for personal communication. Information Systems Journal, 20(2), 183–208. doi:10.1111/isj.2010.20.issue-2
74. L.F.Luna-Reyes,, T.A.Pardo,, J.R.Gil-Garcia,, C.Navarrete,, J.Zhang,, & S.Mellouli, (2010). Digital government in North America: A comparative analysis of policy and program priorities in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative E-Government (pp. 139–160). New York, NY: Springer.
75. R.C.Mayer,, J.H.Davis,, & F.D.Schoorman, (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
76. S.McCoy,, D.F.Galletta,, & W.R.King, (2007). Applying TAM across cultures: The need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 81–90. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000659
77. D.H.McKnight,, V.Choudhury,, & C.Kacmar, (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
78. D.H.McKnight,, L.L.Cummings,, & N.L.Chervany, (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.
79. F.V.Morgeson,, D.VanAmburg,, & S.Mithas, (2011). Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 257–283.
80. K.G.Nelson,, & J.T.D.Clark Jr., (1994). Cross-cultural issues in information systems research: A research program. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 2(4), 19–29. doi:10.4018/JGIM
81. A.Oxendine,, E.Borgida,, J.L.Sullivan,, & M.S.Jackson, (2003). The importance of trust and community in developing and maintaining a community electronic network. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 671–696. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00037-5
82. F.Pai,, & K.Huang, (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 650–660. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.007
83. R.Palanisamy, (2004). Issues and challenges in e-governance planning. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(3), 253–272. doi:10.1504/EG.2004.005551
84. R.Paul,, R.Juric,, J.Kuljis,, & P.Adeshara, (2004). A survey of acceptance of e-government services in the UK. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 12(2), 143–150. doi:10.2498/cit.2004.02.10
85. P.A.Pavlou, (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
86. P.A.Pavlou,, & M.Fygenson, (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.
87. G.L.Polites,, & E.Karahanna, (2012). Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 21–42.
88. M.Ramaswamy,, & A.N.Selian, (2007, January). e-Government in transition countries: Prospects and challenges. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI.
89. C.G.Reddick,, & J.Roy, (2013). Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian survey. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.009
90. L.P.Robert,, A.R.Dennis,, & Y.T.C.Hung, (2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 241–279. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260210
91. J.Rotter, (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665. doi:10.1111/jopy.1967.35.issue-4
92. J.B.Rotter, (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. doi:10.1037/h0031464
93. J.B.Rotter, (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1
94. C.Ryan,, & P.Walsh, (2004). Collaboration of public sector agencies: Reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 621–631. doi:10.1108/09513550410562284
95. L.A.Sabucedo,, & L.A.Rifon, (2010). Managing citizen profiles in the domain of e-government: The cPortfolio project. Information Systems Management, 27(4), 309–319. doi:10.1080/10580530.2010.514181
96. M.Saunders,, P.Lewis,, & A.Thornhill, (2000). Research methods for business students. Essex, UK: Pearson.
97. M.A.Shareef,, V.Kumar,, U.Kumar,, & Y.K.Dwivedi, (2011). e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006
98. N.A.Siddiquee, (2010). Managing for results: Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 38–53. doi:10.1108/09513551011012312
99. I.Sila, (2010). Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance? European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 581–600. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.28
100. J.C.Sipior,, B.T.Ward,, & R.Connolly, (2011). The digital divide and t-government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 308–328. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.64
101. M.L.Smith, (2011). Limitations to building institutional trustworthiness through e-government: A comparative study of two e-services in Chile. Journal of Information Technology, 26, 78–93. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.17
102. Society for IT Management (SOCITM). (2012). Better connected 2012: A snapshot of all local authority websites. Northampton, UK: Author.
103. S.C.Srivastava,, & T.S.Teo, (2009). Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: Insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 31.
104. S.C.Srivastava,, & T.S.H.Teo, (2007). E-government payoffs. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4), 20–40 doi:10.4018/JGIM
105. T.J.Strader,, S.N.Ramaswami,, & P.A.Houle, (2007). Perceived network externalities and communication technology acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 54–65. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000657
106. T.A.Sykes,, V.Venkatesh,, & S.Gosain, (2009). Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 371–393.
107. Y.Tan,, & W.Thoen, (2000). Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 61–74.
108. J.C.Thomas,, & G.Streib, (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug010
109. United Nations. (2008). United Nations e-government survey 2008. From E-government to connected governance. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Public Administration and Development Management (Sales No. E.08.II.H.2).
110. United Nations. (2010). United Nations e-government survey 2010. Leveraging E-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. New York, NY: Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
111. United Nations. (2012). United Nations e-government survey 2012. E-government for the people. New York, NY: Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
112. C.Van Slyke,, F.Bélanger,, & C.Comunale, (2004). Adopting business-to-consumer electronic commerce: The effects of trust and perceived innovation characteristics. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 32–49. doi:10.1145/1007965.1007969
113. V.Venkatesh,, M.G.Morris,, G.B.Davis,, & F.D.Davis, (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
114. V.Venkatesh,, J.Y.L.Thong,, F.K.Y.Chan,, P.J.Hu,, & S.A.Brown, (2011). Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal, 21(6), 527–555. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x
115. Y.Wang, (2008). Assessing e-commerce systems success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal, 18(5), 529–557. doi:10.1111/isj.2008.18.issue-5
116. Y.D.Wang,, & H.H.Emurian, (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 105–125. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008
117. M.Warkentin,, D.Gefen,, P.A.Pavlou,, & G.M.Rose, (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. doi:10.1080/101967802320245929
118. R.T.Watson,, T.H.Ho,, & K.Raman, (1994). Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems. Communications of the ACM, 37(10), 44–55. doi:10.1145/194313.194320
119. V.Weerakkody,, & G.Dhillon, (2008). Moving from e-government to t-government: A study of process reengineering challenges in a UK local authority context. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1–16 doi:10.4018/IJEGR
120. V.Weerakkody,, M.Janssen,, & Y.K.Dwivedi, (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320–328. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
121. V.Weerakkody,, M.Janssen,, & K.Hjort-Madsen, (2007). Integration and enterprise architecture challenges in e-government: A European perspective. International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce (IJCEC), 3(2), 13–35. doi:10.4018/IJCEC
122. E.W.Welch,, C.C.Hinnant,, & M.J.Moon, (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021
123. N.Wright,, & V.Larsen, (2002). The economics of privacy in the information age. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Academy of Marketing Studies.
124. J.Wu,, & A.Lederer, (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 419–432.
125. www.gov.uk. (2013). Government digital strategy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-digital-strategy
126. www.whitehouse.gov. (2013). Digital government: Building a 21st century platform to better serve the American people. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government.html
127. L.G.Zucker, (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1986), 53–111.