Managing risks in a failing IT project: A social constructionist view

Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 414-440

  Lim, Wee Kiat ^a   Sia, Siew Kien ^b   Yeow, Adrian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Case study; It project managent; Process model; Risk management; Social contruction

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

IT PROJECT; MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES; PROCESS MODELING; PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF RISKS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS; SOCIAL CONTRUCTION; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79960800920     PISSN: 15583457     EISSN: 15369323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00269     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alter, S., & Ginzberg, M. (1978). Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation. Sloan Management Review, 20(1), 23-31.
2. Alter, S., & S. A. Sherer (2004). A general, but readily adaptable model of information system risk. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 1-28.
3. Azad, B., & Faraj, S. (2008). Making e-Government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 75-98.
4. Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 37-69.
5. Barrett, M., & Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Information Systems Research, 10(1), 1-22.
6. BBC News. (2007, 4 June 2007). Complacency 'rife' in IT projects. Retrieved 6 June 2007, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6720547.stm
7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966/1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.
8. Berkun, S. (2005). The art of project management. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly. Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53-74.
9. Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Software, 8(1), 32- 41.
10. Bradbury, J. A. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(4), 380-399.
11. Carlo, J., K. Lyytinen, & Boland, R. J. (2004). Systemic risk, information technology artifacts, and high reliability organizations: A case of constructing a radical architecture. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, 4(2), 57-73.
12. Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Nilsson, A. (2008). Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 614-630.
13. Clarke, L., & Short, J. F. J. (1993). Social organization and risk: Some current controversies. Annual Review of Sociology, 19(1), 375-399.
14. Davidson, E. J. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329-358.
15. Davidson, E. J. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 23-39.
16. Davis, G. B. (1982). Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems Journal, 21(1), 4-30.
17. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. Drummond, H. (1996). The politics of risk: Trials and tribulations of the Taurus project. Journal of Information Technology, 11(4), 347-357.
19. Eggen, D., & Witte, G. (2006). The FBI's upgrade that wasn't. In The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.
20. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
21. Golden-Biddle, K. & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic text convince. Organization Science, 4(4), 595-616.
22. Goldstein, H. (2005). Who killed the virtual case file? IEEE Spectrum, 42(9), 24-35.
23. Hansson, S. O. (1989). Dimensions of risk. Risk Analysis, 9(1), 107-112.
24. Hansson, S. O. (2010). Risk: Objective or subjective, facts or values. Journal of Risk Research, 13(2), 231-238.
25. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R.Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187.
26. Keil, M. (1995). Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 421-447.
27. Keil, M., Depledge, G., & Rai, A. (2007). Escalation: The role of problem recognition and cognitive bias. Decision Sciences, 38(3), 391-421.
28. Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. (2000). Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 631-664.
29. Keil, M., Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. (2002). Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: A Delphi study. Information Systems Journal, 12(2), 103-119.
30. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
32. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Vol. 80. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Lin, A., & Silva, L. (2005). The social and political construction of technological frames. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 49-59.
34. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Bermont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
35. Lyytinen, K., Mathiassen, L., & Ropponen, J. (1998). Attention shaping and software risk - A categorical analysis of four classical risk management approaches. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 233-255.
36. Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: a punctuated sociotechnical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589-613.
37. Mähring, M., & Keil, M. (2008). Information technology project escalation: A process model. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 239-272.
38. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology Adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569-600.
39. Manning, P. K. (1989). Managing risk: Managing uncertainty in the British nuclear installations inspectorate. Law and Policy, 11(3), 350-369.
40. Masuda, J. R., & Garvin, T. (2006). Place, culture, and the social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 437-454.
41. McFarlan, F. W. (1981). Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 142-150.
42. McLoughlin, I., Badham, R., & Couchman, P. (2000). Rethinking political process in technological change: Socio-technical configurations and frames. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(1), 17-37.
43. Montealegre, R., & Keil, M. (2000). De-escalating information technology projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 417-447.
44. Myers, M., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the Craft. Information & Organization, 17(1), 2-26.
45. Nahar, N., Lyytinen, K. Huda, N., & Muravyov, S. V. (2006). Success factors for information technology supported international technology transfer: Finding expert consensus. Information and Management, 43(5), 663-677.
46. Newman, M., & Robey, D. (1992). A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 249-266.
47. Orbuch, T. L. (1997). People's accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 455-478.
48. Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174-207.
49. Otway, H. J., & Thomas, K. (1982). Reflections on risk perception and policy. Risk Analysis, 2, 269-282.
50. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books
51. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
52. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
53. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441.
54. Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Renn, O. (1992). Concepts of risks: A classification. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 53-79). Westport, CT: Praeger.
56. Renn, O. (2008). Concepts of risk: An interdisciplinary review part 1: Disciplinary risk concepts. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17(1), 50-66.
57. Schmidt, R. C., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. E. (2001). Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 5-36.
58. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46-62.
59. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Project management research - the challenge and opportunity Project Management Journal, 38(2), 93-99.
60. Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1985). Risk analysis and scientific method: Methodological and ethical problems with evaluating societal hazards. Dodrecht: D. Reidel.
61. Stahl, B. C., Lichtenstein, Y., & Mangan, A. (2003). The limits of risk management - A social construction approach. Communications of the International Information Management Association, 3(3), 15-22.
62. Standish Group. (2003). Latest Standish Group CHAOS Report shows project success rates have improved by 50%. Retrieved from http://www.standishgroup.com/
63. Standish Group. (2009). Standish Group report shows more projects failing and less successful projects. Retrieved July 8, 2009, from http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php
64. Tierney, K. J. (1999). Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum, 14(2), 215-242.
65. Tierney, K. J. (2007). From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 503-525.
66. Tierney, K. J., & Bevc, C. (2007). Disaster as war: Militarism and the social construction of disaster in New Orleans. In D. L. Brunsma, D. Overfelt & J. S. Picou (Eds.), The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (pp. 35-50). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
67. Tyre, M., & Orlikowski, W. (1994). Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1), 98-118.
68. U.S. Office of the Inspector General. (2005). Statement of Glenn A. Fine Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice before the Senate Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State and the Judiciary concerning The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Trilogy Information Technology Modernization Project. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/oig/testimony/0502/final.pdf.
69. Van de Ven, A. (2007). Designing process studies. In A. Van de Ven (Ed.), Engaged scholarship: Creating knowledge for science and practice (pp. 194-231). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70. Van de Ven, A., & Huber, G. (1990). Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organization Science, 1(3), 213-219.
71. Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. S. (1990). Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Organization Science, 1(3), 313-335.
72. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73. Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 271-305.
74. Wagner, E., & Newell, S. (2006). Repairing ERP: Producing social order to create a working information system. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 40-57.
75. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
76. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In R. I. Sutton & B. W. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 81-123). Connecticut: JAI Press.
77. Wynne, B. (1992). Carving out science (and politics) in the regulatory jungle. Social Studies of Science, 22(4), 745-758.
78. Yeow, A., & Sia, S. (2008). Negotiating best practices in package software implementation. Information & Organization, 18(1), 1-28.