Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context

Information Systems Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 527-555

  Venkatesh, Viswanath ^a   Thong, James Y L ^b   Chan, Frank K Y ^b   Hu, Paul Jen Hwa ^c   Brown, Susan A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

E government; Expectation confirmation theory; Technology acceptance model; Technology adoption; Two stage model of IS continuance; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT)

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

E-GOVERNMENTS; EXPECTATION CONFIRMATION THEORY; IS CONTINUANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THE UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY(UTAUT);

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 80054841793     PISSN: 13501917     EISSN: 13652575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alvesson, M. & Karreman, D. (2007) Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1265-1281.
2. Bagozzi, R.P. (1992) The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 178-204.
3. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370.
4. Bhattacherjee, A. & Premkumar, G. (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28, 229-254.
5. Blau, P. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York.
6. Bradach, J.L. & Eccles, R.G. (1989) Price, authority, and trust - from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
7. Brown, S.A. & Venkatesh, V. (2005) Model of adoption of technology in the household: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29, 399-426.
8. Brown, S.A., Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M. & Burkman, J. (2002) Do I really have to: understanding technology acceptance when use is mandatory. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 283-295.
9. Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V. & Goyal, S. (forthcoming) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Information Systems Research.
10. Cards International (2007) Security and fraud: the changing face of fraud. Cards International, London, May 7, 2007.
11. Carter, L. & Bélanger, F. (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25.
12. Chen, S.C. & Dhillon, G.S. (2003) Interpreting dimensions of consumer trust in e-commerce. Information Technology and Management, 4, 303-318.
13. Festinger, L. (1957) Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
14. Gioia, D.A. & Pitre, E. (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15, 584-602.
15. Greenwood, W.T. (1974) Future management theory: a 'comparative' evolution to a general theory. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 503-513.
16. Hong, S.J. & Tam, K.Y. (2006) Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17, 161-179.
17. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.M. & Tam, K.Y. (2002) Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 97-124.
18. Hong, S.J., Thong, J.Y.L. & Tam, K.Y. (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1819-1834.
19. Hsieh, J.J.P. & Wang, W. (2007) Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 216-227.
20. Johns, G. (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.
21. Keil, M. (1995) Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 19, 421-447.
22. Keil, M. & Mann, J. (2000) Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24, 631-664.
23. Keil, M., Rai, A., Mann, J. & Zhang, G.P. (2003) Why software projects escalate: the importance of project management constructs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 251-261.
24. Kelman, H.C. (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
25. Kim, J.W., Kim, K.T. & Choi, J.U. (2006) Securing e-government services. Computer, 39, 111-112.
26. Lindell, M.K. & Whitney, D.J. (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121.
27. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S. & Patil, A. (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 1865-1883.
28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D. (1995) An integrated model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
29. McAllister, D.J. (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
30. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. & Kacmar, C. (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334-359.
31. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I. & Bitner, M.J. (2000) Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.
32. Meuter, M.L., Bitner, M.J., Ostrom, A.L. & Brown, S.W. (2005) Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: an investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. Journal of Marketing, 69, 61-83.
33. Moon, M.J. & Norris, D.F. (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15, 43-60.
34. Nelson, M.R. (2005) Understanding large-scale IT project failure: escalating and de-escalating commitment. In: Handbook of Public Information Systems, Garson, G.D. (ed.), pp. 93-106. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
35. Oliver, R.L. (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.
36. Oliver, R.L. (1981) Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57, 25-48.
37. Orlikowski, W.J. & Iacono, C.S. (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the 'IT' in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12, 121-134.
38. Pavlou, P.A. & Fygenson, M. (2006) Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30, 115-143.
39. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
40. Premkumar, G. & Bhattacherjee, A. (2008) Explaining information technology usage: a test of competing models. Omega, 36, 64-75.
41. Rai, A. & Patnayakuni, R. (1996) A structural model for CASE adoption behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 205-234.
42. Ravichandran, T. & Rai, A. (2000) Total quality management in information systems development: key constructs and relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 119-156.
43. Ryan, M.J. (1982) Behavioral intention formation: the interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 263-278.
44. Schepers, J. & Wetzels, M. (2007) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effect. Information & Management, 44, 90-103.
45. Sheridan, J.E. & Vredenburgh, D.J. (1979) Structural model of leadership influence in a hospital organization. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 6-21.
46. Sia, C.L., Tan, B.C.Y. & Wei, K.K. (2002) Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13, 70-90.
47. Straub, D.W. & Burton-Jones, A. (2007) Veni, vidi, vici: breaking the TAM logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 223-229.
48. Straub, D.W., Rai, A. & Klein, R. (2004) Measuring firm performance at the network level: a nomology of the business impact of digital supply networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 83-114.
49. Susarla, A., Barua, A. & Whinston, A.B. (2003) Understanding the service component of application service provision: an empirical analysis of satisfaction with ASP services. MIS Quarterly, 27, 91-123.
50. Sykes, T.A., Venkatesh, V. & Gosain, S. (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand individual-level system use. MIS Quarterly, 33, 371-393.
51. Thong, J.Y.L. (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 187-214.
52. Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, S.J. & Tam, K.Y. (2006) The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 799-810.
53. USA Today (2006) Growing numbers are buying less online. USA Today, 134, New York, March 2006.
54. Van der Heijden, H. (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 695-704.
55. Venkatesh, V. (1999) Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 239-260.
56. Venkatesh, V. (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365.
57. Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273-315.
58. Venkatesh, V. & Brown, S.A. (2001) A longitudinal investigation of personal computer adoption in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25, 71-102.
59. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-481.
60. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
61. Venkatesh, V. & Goyal, S. (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quarterly, 34, 281-303.
62. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
63. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D. & Morris, M.G. (2007) Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 267-286.
64. Wang, Y.S. (2008) Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal, 18, 529-557.
65. Wang, S., Archer, N.P. & Zheng, W. (2006) An exploratory study of electronic marketplace adoption: a multiple perspective view. Electronic Markets, 16, 337-348.
66. Wang, H.I. & Yang, H.L. (2005) The role of personality traits in UTAUT model under online stocking. Contemporary Management Research, 1, 69-82.
67. West, D.M. (2002) State and Federal E-Government in the United States. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
68. Wixom, B.H. & Todd, P.A. (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16, 85-102.
69. Yu, Y.W.K. (2005) Electronic government and its implication for data privacy in Hong Kong: can personal data (privacy) ordinance protect the privacy of personal information in cyberspace? International Review of Law Computers, 19, 143-163.