Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 371-391

  Welch, Eric W ^a   Hinnant, Charles C ^b   Moon, M Jae ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b University of Gerogia   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144457211     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui021     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174-84.
2. Demchak, C., C. Friis, and T. M. LaPorte. 1998. Reflections on configuring public agencies in cyberspace: A conceptual investigation in cyberspace. In Public administration in an information age: A handbook, ed. I. Th. M. Snellen and W. B. H. J. van de Donk, 225-44. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
3. _. 2000. Webbing governance. In Handbook of public information systems, ed. G. D. Garson, pp. 179-96. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
4. Fulla, S., and E. Welch. 2002, 7-10 January. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
5. Greene, W. H. 2000. Econometric analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Hart/Teeter. 2001. E-government study #6446a. Data set, Council for Excellence in Government, received May 2002.
7. _. 2002. E-government: To connect, protect and serve us. Available at http://www.excelgov.org/displayContent.asp?Keyword=ppp022602, accessed November 15, 2004.
8. LaPorte, T. M., C. C. Demchak, and M. de Jong. 2002. Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration and Society 34 (4): 411-46.
9. Musso, Juliet, Christopher Weare, and Matt Hale. 2000. Designing Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication 17:1-19.
10. Mutz, D., and G. Flemming. 1999. How good people make bad collectives: A social-psychological perspective on public attitude. In Congress and the decline of pubic trust, ed. Joseph Cooper, pp. 79-100. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11. Nelson, M. 1997. Building trust in cyberspace. International Information and Library Review 29:153-57.
12. Nye, J., Jr. 1997. Introduction: The decline of confidence in government. In Why people don't trust government, ed. J. Nye Jr., P. Zelikow, and D. King, pp. 1-18. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Orren, G. 1997. Fall from grace: The public's loss of faith in government. In Why people don't trust government, ed. J. Nye Jr., P. Zelikow, and D. King, pp. 77-108. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Peters, B. G. 1999. American public policy: Promise and performance. 5th ed. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
15. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling along: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
16. Pyndyck, R. S., and D. L. Rubinfeld. 1991. Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw Hill.
17. Rafaeli, S. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, ed. R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wieman, and S. Pingree, pp. 110-34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Rainey, H. 1997. Understanding and managing public organizations. 2d ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
19. Reichard, C. 1998. The impact of performance management on transparency and accountability in the public sector. In Ethics and accountability in a context of governance and New Public Management, ed. Annie Hondeghem, 123-37. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
20. Roberts, N. 2002. Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: Resolving the accountability paradox. Public Administration Review 62 (6): 658-69.
21. Ruscio, Kenneth P. 1996. Trust, democracy, and public management: A theoretical argument. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6 (3): 461-77.
22. Shah, D. V., J. M. McLeod, and S. H. Yoon. 2001. Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and internet influences. Communication Research 28:464-507.
23. Shapiro, A. L. 1999. The control revolution: How the Internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know. New York: The Century Foundation.
24. Shapiro, S. P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology 93:623-58.
25. Stayaert, J. 2000. Local governments online and the role of the president: Government shop versus the electronic community. Social Science Computer Review 18:3-16.
26. Thomas, C. W. 1998. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration and Society 30 (2): 166-93.
27. Weber, L. M., and S. Murray. 2002. A survey of literature on the Internet and democracy, http://insites.heinz.cmu.edu:8080/insites/events/past_events/ conferences/democracy/program.html/abstract/weber.html, accessed November 15, 2004.
28. West, D. M. 2001. E-government and the transformation of public sector service delivery. Unpublished MS.
29. Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic tructure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior 8:53-111.