Testing of a model evaluating e-government portal acceptance and satisfaction

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, ECIME 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 282-292

  Lai, Cora Sio Kuan ^a   Pires, Guilherme ^b  

^a MACAO POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (Macao)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adoption; E government portal; EUS; Satisfaction; TAM

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; WEBSITES;

ADOPTION; E-GOVERNMENT PORTALS; EUS; SATISFACTION; TAM;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84896306206     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Au, N., Ngai, E. and Cheng, T. (2002) A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework, Omega, 30, 6, 451-78.
2. Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction is social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173-82.
3. Boyer, K., Olson, J., Calantone, R. and Jackson, E. (2002) Print versus electronic surveys: a comparison of two data collection methodologies, Journal of Operations Management, 20, 357-73.
4. Carter, L. and Belanger, F. (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Information Systems Journal, 15, 1, 5-25.
5. Cheong, W. (2007) Macau Internet Usage Report, accessed Aug.20, 2007, http://www.rthk/org.hk/mediadigest/20070215_76_121332.html.
6. China.com.cn (2006) High Internet Usage Rate Among the Young People in Macau, accessed Aug. 24, 2007, http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/TCC/1101125.htm.
7. Chu, P. Hsiao, N., Lee, F. and Chen, C. (2004) Exploring success factors for Taiwan's government electronic tendering system: behavioral perspectives from end users, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 2, 219-34.
8. Davis, F. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 340-51.
9. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35, 8, 982.
10. Davis, F. D. (1993) User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487
11. DeLone, W. and McLean, E. (1992) Information Systems Success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 3, 1, 60-95.
12. Doherty, N. and King, M. (2004) The Treatment of Organisational Issues in Systems Development Projects: The Implications for the Evaluation of Information Technology Investments, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 4, 1, 1.
13. Doll, W., Raghunathan, T., Jeen-Su, L. and Gupta, Y. (1995) A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument, Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 177-88.
14. Doll, W. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction, MIS Quarterly, 12, 2, 259-74.
15. Furneaux, B. (2006) Theories used in IS research : Technology Acceptance Model, accessed Aug. 6, 2007, http://www.istheory.yorku.ca/.
16. Gant, J., Gant, D. and Sprague, R. (2002) Web portal functionality and state government e-service, In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA, 1627-36.
17. Gefen, D., Warkentin, M., Pavlou, P. and Rose, G. (2002) EGovernment Adoption, In Proceedings of the 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 569-76.
18. Grant, G. and Chau, D. (2004) Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government, Journal of Global Information Management, 13, 1, 1-30.
19. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (2006) Multivariate data analysis, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. Ho, A. (2002) Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative, Public Administration Review, 62, 4, 434-44.
21. Hu, P., Chau, P., Liu Sheng, O. and Tam, K. (1999) Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 2, 91-112.
22. Huizingh, E. (2000) The content and design of web site: an empirical study, Information and Management, 27, 3, 123-34.
23. Janowski, T., Estevez E., and Ojo A. (2004) eMacao Domain Analysis Concluding Workshop, Macao e-Government Survey Summary and Findings, Public Administration Building Auditorium, Dec. 17.
24. Janowski, T., Ojo A., & Estevez E. (2005) The State of Electronic Government in Macao, Volume 1: Survey, e-Macao Task1 Report, United Nations University International Institute of Software Technology
25. Kenny, D. (2006) Mediation, accessed Sep. 14, 2007, http://davidkenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
26. Lee, C. and Lei, U. (2007) Adoption of eGovernment Services in Macao, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Macao.
27. Malhotra, Y. and Galletta, D. (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation, In 32nd HICSS, Hawaii, 1-14.
28. McKinney, V., Yoon, K. and Zahedi, F. (2002) The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach, Information Systems Research, 13, 3, 296-315.
29. Melone, N. (1990) A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research, Management Science, 36, 1, 76-91.
30. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 192-222.
31. Nunnally, J. (1978) Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
32. Pikkarainen, K., Pikkarainen, T., Karjaluoto, H. and Pahnila, S. (2006) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction of online banking services: empirical evidence from Finland, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24, 3
33. Preacher, K. and Hayes, A. (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 4, 717-31.
34. Rao, H., Chai, S., Herath, T. and Park, I. (2006) Repeated Use of E-Gov Web Sites: A Satisfaction and Confidentiality Perspective, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2, 3, 1-22.
35. RTHK (2007) The current status of Internet in Macau (in Chinese), accessed Aug. 24, 2007, http://www.rthk.org.hk/mediadigest/20070215_76_121332.html.
36. SAFP (2004) The Integration of Macau SAR government portal and InforMac completed, Department of Public Administration and Civil Service Bureau, assessed Aug. 4, 2006, available from the Government Intranet.
37. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects, Information & Management, 44, 1, 90-103.
38. Schaupp, L., Fan, W. and Belanger, F. (2006) Determining success for different website goals, In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), Hawaii, 1-10.
39. Seddon, P. (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean's model of IS success, Information Systems Research, 8, 3, 240-53.
40. Shrout, P. and Bolger, N. (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations, Psychological methods, 7, 4, 422-45.
41. Straub, D. W. (1989) Validating Instruments in MIS Research, MIS Quarterly, 13, 2, 147-69.
42. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995) Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 144-76.
43. Thomas, S. J. (2004) Using web and paper questionnaires for data-based decision making-from design to interpretation of the results, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
44. Thompson, R. and Higgins, C. (1991) Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly, 15, 1, 125.
45. Ticehurst, G. and Veal, A. (2000) Business Research Methods-a managerial approach, Pearson Education, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales.
46. UNPA and ASPA (2001) Benchmarking e-Government: A Global Perspective, accessed Jun. 24, 2007, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan003984.pdf
47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, G. and Davis, F. D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-78.
48. Wang, Y., Tang, T. and Tang, J. (2001) An instrument for measuring customer satisfaction toward we sites that market digital products and service, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2, 3, 89-102.
49. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W. and Papasratorn, B. (2005) Factors Influencing the Adoption of Thai eGovernment Websites: Information Quality and System Quality Approach, In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eBusiness, Bangkok
50. Wixom, B. and Todd, P. (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance, Information Systems Research, 16, 1, 85-102.
51. World Bank (2002) The e-Government Handbook for developing countries, Centre for Democracy & Technology, World Bank, assessed Aug. 2,2006, www.infodev.org.