RIM15 antagonistic pleiotropy is responsible for differences in fermentation and stress response kinetics in budding yeast

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Kessi Pérez, Eduardo I ^a   Araos, Sebastián ^a   García, Verónica ^a   Salinas, Francisco ^b   Abarca, Valentina ^a   Larrondo, Luis F ^b   Martínez, Claudio ^a   Cubillos, Francisco A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Fermentation; Fungicide; Natural variation; QTL; RIM15; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; FUNGICIDE; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; NITROGEN; PROTEIN KINASE; RIM15 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE; GENE FUNCTION; HEMIZYGOSITY; HEMIZYGOTE; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; NITROGEN UTILIZATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; RIM15 GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SAKE; STORAGE; WILD TYPE; WINE; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; DRUG RESISTANCE, FUNGAL; FERMENTATION; FUNGICIDES, INDUSTRIAL; GENE DELETION; PROTEIN KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84964467112     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fow021     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Almeida P, Goncalves C, Teixeira S et al. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat Commun 2014;5:4044.
2. Bergstrom A, Simpson JT, Salinas F et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2014;31:872-88.
3. Brice C, Sanchez I, Bigey F et al. A genetic approach of wine yeast fermentation capacity in nitrogen-starvation reveals the key role of nitrogen signaling. BMC Genomics 2014;15:495.
4. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S et al. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2003;19:889-90.
5. Cameroni E, Hulo N, Roosen J et al. The novel yeast PAS kinase Rim 15 orchestrates G0-associated antioxidant defense mechanisms. Cell Cycle 2004;3:462-8.
6. Costa C, Ponte A, Pais P et al. New mechanisms of flucytosine resistance in C. glabrata unveiled by a chemogenomics analysis in S. cerevisiae. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135110.
7. Crepin L, Nidelet T, Sanchez I et al. Sequential use of nitrogen compounds by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: a model based on kinetic and regulation characteristics of nitrogen permeases. Appl Environ Microb 2012;78:8102- 11.
8. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zorgo E et al. Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol 2011;20:1401-13.
9. Cubillos FA, Louis EJ, Liti G. Generation of a large set of genetically tractable haploid and diploid Saccharomyces strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2009;9:1217-25.
10. Cubillos FA, Parts L, Salinas F et al. High-resolution mapping of complex traits with a four-parent advanced intercross yeast population. Genetics 2013;195:1141-55.
11. Dias PJ, TeixeiraMC, Telo JP et al. Insights into the mechanisms of toxicity and tolerance to the agricultural fungicide mancozeb in yeast, as suggested by a chemogenomic approach. OMICS 2010;14:211-27.
12. Ehrenreich IM, Gerke JP, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits in yeast: insights from studies of gene expression and other phenotypes in the BYxRM cross. Cold Spring Harb Sym 2009;74:145-53.
13. Fai PB, Grant A. A rapid resazurin bioassay for assessing the toxicity of fungicides. Chemosphere 2009;74:1165-70.
14. Fay JC, McCullough HL, Sniegowski PD et al. Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 2004;5:R26.
15. Fisher RA. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1930.
16. Ganga MA, Martinez C. Effect of wine yeast monoculture practice on the biodiversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts. J Appl Microbiol 2004;96:76-83.
17. Garcia-Rios E, Lopez-Malo M, Guillamon JM. Global phenotypic and genomic comparison of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains reveals a novel role of the sulfur assimilation pathway in adaptation at low temperature fermentations. BMC Genomics 2014;15:1059.
18. Garnier J, Osguthorpe DJ, Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1978;120:97-120.
19. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11:4241-57.
20. Gomez-Alonso S, Hermosin-Gutierrez I, Garcia-Romero E. Simultaneous HPLC analysis of biogenic amines, amino acids, and ammonium ion as aminoenone derivatives in wine and beer samples. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:608-13.
21. Goujon M,McWilliamH, LiWet al. A newbioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W695- 9.
22. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307-21.
23. Gutierrez A, Beltran G, Warringer J et al. Genetic basis of variations in nitrogen source utilization in four wine commercial yeast strains. PLoS One 2013;8:e67166.
24. Huxley C, Green ED, Dunham I. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet 1990;6:236.
25. Ibstedt S, Stenberg S, Bages S et al. Concerted evolution of life stage performances signals recent selection on yeast nitrogen use. Mol Biol Evol 2015;32:153-61.
26. Illingworth CJ, Parts L, Bergstrom A et al. Inferring genome-wide recombination landscapes from advanced intercross lines: application to yeast crosses. PLoS One 2013;8:e62266.
27. Jara M, Cubillos FA, Garcia V et al. Mapping genetic variants underlying differences in the central nitrogen metabolism in fermenter yeasts. PLoS One 2014;9:e86533.
28. Katou T, Kitagaki H, Akao T et al. Brewing characteristics of haploid strains isolated from sake yeast Kyokai No. 7. Yeast 2008;25:799-807.
29. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1647-9.
30. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM et al. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 2007;16:2091-102.
31. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009;458:337-41.
32. Liti G, Louis EJ. Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002912.
33. Mackay TF, Stone EA, Ayroles JF. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:565- 77.
34. Martinez-Pastor MT, Marchler G, Schuller C et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J 1996;15:2227-35.
35. Marullo P, Aigle M, Bely M et al. Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2007; 7:941-52.
36. Milanovic V, Comitini F, Ciani M. Grape berry yeast communities: influence of fungicide treatments. Int J Food Microbiol 2013;161:240-6.
37. Mirisola MG, Taormina G, Fabrizio P et al. Serine- and threonine/valine-dependent activation of PDK and Tor orthologs converge on Sch 9 to promote aging. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004113.
38. Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T et al. Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res 2009;16:115- 29.
39. Nissen TL, Schulze U, Nielsen J et al. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 1997;143:203-18.
40. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E et al. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:16333-8.
41. Parts L. Genome-wide mapping of cellular traits using yeast. Yeast 2014;31:197-205.
42. Pedruzzi I, Burckert N, Egger P et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras/cAMP pathway controls post-diauxic shift elementdependent transcription through the zinc finger protein Gis1. EMBO J 2000;19:2569-79.
43. Pedruzzi I, Dubouloz F, Cameroni E et al. TOR and PKA signaling pathways converge on the protein kinase Rim15 to control entry into G0. Mol Cell 2003;12:1607-13.
44. Pretorius IS, Curtin CD, Chambers PJ. Thewinemaker's bug: From ancient wisdom to opening new vistas with frontier yeast science. Bioeng Bugs 2012;3:147-56.
45. Qian W, Ma D, Xiao C et al. The genomic landscape and evolutionary resolution of antagonistic pleiotropy in yeast. Cell Rep 2012.
46. Querol A, Fernandez-Espinar MT, del OlmoMet al. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast. Int J Food Microbiol 2003;86:3-10.
47. Reinders A, Burckert N, Boller T et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cAMP-dependent protein kinase controls entry into stationary phase through the Rim15p protein kinase. Genes Dev 1998;12:2943-55.
48. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A et al. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 2003;20:1369-85.
49. Salinas F, Cubillos FA, Soto D et al. The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 2012;7:e49640.
50. Sicard D, Legras JL. Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. CR Biol 2011;334:229-36.
51. Skelly DA, Merrihew GE, Riffle M et al. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res 2013;23:1496-504.
52. Steyer D, Ambroset C, Brion C et al. QTL mapping of the production of wine aroma compounds by yeast. BMC Genomics 2012;13:573.
53. Swinnen E, Wanke V, Roosen J et al. Rim15 and the crossroads of nutrient signalling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Div 2006;1:3.
54. Teixeira MC, Dias PJ, Simoes T et al. Yeast adaptation to mancozeb involves the up-regulation of FLR1 under the coordinate control of Yap1, Rpn4, Pdr3, and Yrr1. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2008;367:249-55.
55. Tesniere C, Brice C, Blondin B. Responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to nitrogen starvation in wine alcoholic fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biot 2015;99:7025-34.
56. Warringer J, Zorgo E, Cubillos FA et al. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002111.
57. Watanabe D, Araki Y, Zhou Y et al. A loss-of-function mutation in the PAS kinase Rim15p is related to defective quiescence entry and high fermentation rates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains. Appl Environ Microb 2012; 78:4008-16.
58. Watanabe D, Zhou Y, Hirata A et al. Inhibitory role of greatwalllike protein kinase rim15p in alcoholic fermentation via upregulating the udp-glucose synthesis pathway in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microb 2015;82:340-51.
59. Wei M, Fabrizio P, Madia F et al. Tor1/Sch 9-regulated carbon source substitution is as effective as calorie restriction in life span extension. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000467.
60. Yadav A, Radhakrishnan A, Bhanot G et al. Differential regulation of antagonistic pleiotropy in synthetic and natural populations suggests its role in adaptation. G3 (Bethesda) 2015;5:699- 709.