Genome-wide mapping of cellular traits using yeast

Yeast

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 197-205

  Parts, Leopold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mapping; Phenotyping; QTL analysis; Quantitative genetics; Saccharomyces

Indexed keywords

DNA; NUCLEASE; NUCLEIC ACID; RNA;

ARTICLE; BACTERIOPHAGE; CELL STRUCTURE; ESSENTIAL GENE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HEMIZYGOSITY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; TRANSPOSON; ALLELE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ALLELES; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84902011349     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3010     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Albert FW, Treusch S, Shockley AH, et al. 2014. Genetics of single-cell protein abundance variation in large yeast populations. Nature 506: 494-497.
2. Ansel J, Bottin H, Rodriguez-Beltran C, et al. 2008. Cell-to-cell stochastic variation in gene expression is a complex genetic trait. PLoS Genet 4: e1000049.
3. Ben-Aroya S, Coombes C, Kwok T, et al. 2008. Toward a comprehensive temperature-sensitive mutant repository of the essential genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 30: 248-258.
4. Bergstrom A, Simpson JT, Salinas F, et al. 2014. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol Biol Evol 31(4): 872-888.
5. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, et al. 2013. Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494: 234-237.
6. Brauer MJ, Christianson CM, Pai DA, Dunham MJ. 2006. Mapping novel traits by array-assisted bulk segregant analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173: 1813-1816.
7. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L. 2002. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296: 752-755.
8. Breunig JS, Hackett SR, Rabinowitz JD, Kruglyak L. 2014. Genetic basis of metabolome variation in yeast. PLoS Genet 10: e1004142.
9. Brion C, Ambroset C, Sanchez I, et al. 2013. Differential adaptation to multi-stressed conditions of wine fermentation revealed by variations in yeast regulatory networks. BMC Genom 14: 681.
10. Burke MK, Dunham JP, Shahrestani P, et al. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467: 587-590.
11. Carette JE, Guimaraes CP, Varadarajan M, et al. 2009. Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Science 326: 1231-1235.
12. Clasquin MF, Melamud E, Singer A, et al. 2011. Riboneogenesis in yeast. Cell 145: 969-980.
13. Connelly CF, Akey JM. 2012. On the prospects of whole-genome association mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191: 1345-1353.
14. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431.
15. Cubillos FA, Parts L, Salinas F, et al. 2013. High-resolution mapping of complex traits with a four-parent advanced intercross yeast population. Genetics 195: 1141-1155.
16. Diao L, Chen KC. 2012. Local ancestry corrects for population structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome-wide association studies. Genetics 192: 1503-1511.
17. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, et al. 2013. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 4336-4343.
18. Domaille DW, Que EL, Chang CJ. 2008. Synthetic fluorescent sensors for studying the cell biology of metals. Nat Chem Biol 4: 168-175.
19. Dowell RD, Ryan O, Jansen A, et al. 2010. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328: 469.
20. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, et al. 2010. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465: 363-367.
21. Dunn B, Paulish T, Stanbery A, et al. 2013. Recurrent rearrangement during adaptive evolution in an interspecific yeast hybrid suggests a model for rapid introgression. PLoS Genet 9: e1003366.
22. Ehrenreich IM, Torabi N, Jia Y, et al. 2010. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 464: 1039-1042.
23. Ehrenreich IM, Bloom J, Torabi N, et al. 2012. Genetic architecture of highly complex chemical resistance traits across four yeast strains. PLoS Genet 8: e1002570.
24. Gabriel A, Dapprich J, Kunkel M, et al. 2006. Global mapping of transposon location. PLoS Genet 2: e212.
25. Gagneur J, Stegle O, Zhu C, et al. 2013. Genotype-environment interactions reveal causal pathways that mediate genetic effects on phenotype. PLoS Genet 9: e1003803.
26. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
27. de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, Cox J, et al. 2008. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455: 1251-1254.
28. Handfield LF, Chong YT, Simmons J, et al. 2013. Unsupervised clustering of subcellular protein expression patterns in high-throughput microscopy images reveals protein complexes and functional relationships between proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003085.
29. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425: 686-691.
30. Illingworth CJ, Parts L, Schiffels S, et al. 2012. Quantifying selection acting on a complex trait using allele frequency time series data. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1187-1197.
31. Illingworth CJ, Parts L, Bergstrom A, et al. 2013. Inferring genome-wide recombination landscapes from advanced intercross lines: application to yeast crosses. PLoS One 8: e62266.
32. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324: 218-223.
33. Jolma A, Yan J, Whitington T, et al. 2013. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152: 327-339.
34. Kettunen J, Tukiainen T, Sarin AP, et al. 2012. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci influencing human serum metabolite levels. Nat Genet 44: 269-276.
35. Khan Z, Ford MJ, Cusanovich DA, et al. 2013. Primate transcript and protein expression levels evolve under compensatory selection pressures. Science 342: 1100-1104.
36. Khmelinskii A, Keller PJ, Bartosik A, et al. 2012. Tandem fluorescent protein timers for in vivo analysis of protein dynamics. Nat Biotechnol 30: 708-714.
37. Kim DU, Hayles J, Kim D, et al. 2010. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol 28: 617-623.
38. Kondo S, Ueda R. 2013. Highly improved gene targeting by germline-specific cas9 expression in Drosophila. Genetics 195: 715-721.
39. Kumar A, Seringhaus M, Biery MC, et al. 2004. Large-scale mutagenesis of the yeast genome using a Tn7-derived multipurpose transposon. Genome Res 14: 1975-1986.
40. Lang GI, Murray AW. 2008. Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178: 67-82.
41. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, et al. 2013. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500: 571-574.
42. Langridge GC, Phan MD, Turner DJ, et al. 2009. Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. Genome Res 9: 2308-2316.
43. Lee HN, Mostovoy Y, Hsu TY, et al. 2013. Divergence of iron metabolism in wild Malaysian yeast. Genes Genomes Genet 3: 2187-2194.
44. Li Z, Vizeacoumar FJ, Bahr S, et al. 2011. Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat Biotechnol 29: 361-367.
45. Liachko I, Youngblood RA, Keich U, Dunham MJ. 2013. High-resolution mapping, characterization, and optimization of autonomously replicating sequences in yeast. Genome Res 23: 698-704.
46. Linderholm A, Dietzel K, Hirst M, Bisson LF. 2010. Identification of MET10-932 and characterization as an allele reducing hydrogen sulfide formation in wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 7699-7707.
47. Listgarten J, Lippert C, Kadie CM, et al. 2012. Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods 9: 525-526.
48. Liti G, Louis EJ. 2012. Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 8: e1002912.
49. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, et al. 2009a. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
50. Liti G, Haricharan S, Cubillos FA, et al. 2009b. Segregating YKU80 and TLC1 alleles underlying natural variation in telomere properties in wild yeast. PLoS Genet 5: e1000659.
51. Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, et al. 2007. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 25: 117-124.
52. Mancera E, Bourgon R, Brozzi A, et al. 2008. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454: 479-485.
53. Marguerat S, Schmidt A, Codlin S, et al. 2012. Quantitative analysis of fission yeast transcriptomes and proteomes in proliferating and quiescent cells. Cell 151: 671-683.
54. Marx H, Lemeer S, Schliep JE, et al. 2013. A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 31: 557-564.
55. von Melchner H, Ruley HE. 1989. Identification of cellular promoters by using a retrovirus promoter trap. J Virol 63: 3227-3233.
56. Neil H, Malabat C, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, et al. 2009. Widespread bidirectional promoters are the major source of cryptic transcripts in yeast. Nature 457: 1038-1042.
57. New AM, Cerulus B, Govers SK, et al. 2014. Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments. PLoS Biol 12: e1001764.
58. Nogami S, Ohya Y, Yvert G. 2007. Genetic complexity and quantitative trait loci mapping of yeast morphological traits. PLoS Genet 3: e31.
59. Ohya Y, Sese J, Yukawa M, et al. 2005. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 19015-19020.
60. Parts L, Cubillos FA, Warringer J, et al. 2011. Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. Genome Res 21: 1131-1138.
61. Parts L, Liu YC, Tekkedil MM, et al. 2014. Heritability and genetic basis of protein level variation in an outbred population. Genome Research in press.
62. Pettitt SJ, Rehman FL, Bajrami I, et al. 2013. A genetic screen using the PiggyBac transposon in haploid cells identifies Parp1 as a mediator of olaparib toxicity. PLoS One 8: e61520.
63. Picotti P, Clement-Ziza M, Lam H, et al. 2013. A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature 494: 266-270.
64. Prosser DC, Whitworth K, Wendland B. 2010. Quantitative analysis of endocytosis with cytoplasmic pHluorin chimeras. Traffic 11: 1141-1150.
65. Richter CL, Dunn B, Sherlock G, Pugh T. 2013. Comparative metabolic footprinting of a large number of commercial wine yeast strains in Chardonnay fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 13: 394-410.
66. Salinas F, Cubillos FA, Soto D, et al. 2012. The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 7: e49640.
67. Sarov M, Murray JI, Schanze K, et al. 2012. A genome-scale resource for in vivo tag-based protein function exploration in C. elegans. Cell 150: 855-866.
68. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L. 2009. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458: 342-345.
69. Segre AV, Murray AW, Leu JY. 2006. High-resolution mutation mapping reveals parallel experimental evolution in yeast. PLoS Biol 4: e256.
70. Shalem O, Sanjana NE, Hartenian E, et al. 2013. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343(6166): 80-84.
71. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, et al. 2013. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31: 686-688.
72. Skelly DA, Merrihew GE, Riffle M, et al. 2013. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res 23: 1496-1504.
73. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, et al. 2006. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell 21: 319-330.
74. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, et al. 2002. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416: 326-330.
75. Steyer D, Ambroset C, Brion C, et al. 2012. QTL mapping of the production of wine aroma compounds by yeast. BMC Genom 13: 573.
76. Tong AH, Boone C. 2006. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 313: 171-192.
77. Tzur YB, Friedland AE, Nadarajan S, et al. 2013. Heritable custom genomic modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Genetics 195: 1181-1185.
78. Venable JD, Dong MQ, Wohlschlegel J, et al. 2004. Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat Methods 1: 39-45.
79. Vevea JD, Wolken DM, Swayne TC, et al. 2013. Ratiometric biosensors that measure mitochondrial redox state and ATP in living yeast cells. J Visual Exp 77. doi:10.3791/50633.
80. Vizeacoumar FJ, van Dyk N, S Vizeacoumar F, et al. 2010. Integrating high-throughput genetic interaction mapping and high-content screening to explore yeast spindle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 188: 69-81.
81. Wagih O, Parts L. 2014. Gitter: a robust and accurate method for quantification of colony sizes from plate images. Genes Genomes Genet 4: 547-552.
82. Wagih O, Usaj M, Baryshnikova A, et al. 2013. SGAtools: One-stop analysis and visualization of array-based genetic interaction screens. Nucleic Acids Res 41: W591-W596.
83. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, et al. 2013a. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153: 910-918.
84. Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, Lander ES. 2013b. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Science 343(6166): 80-84.
85. Warringer J, Blomberg A. 2014. Yeast phenomics - large-scale mapping of genetic basis of organismal traits. In Phenomics. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 172-206.
86. Warringer J, Ericson E, Fernandez L, et al. 2003. High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15724-15729.
87. Warringer J, Zorgo E, Cubillos FA, et al. 2011. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet 7: e1002111.
88. Wilkening S, Lin G, Fritsch ES, et al. 2013a. An evaluation of high-throughput approaches to QTL mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 196(3): 853-865.
89. Wilkening S, Tekkedil MM, Lin G, et al. 2013b. Genotyping 1000 yeast strains by next-generation sequencing. BMC Genom 14: 90.
90. Wu L, Candille SI, Choi Y, et al. 2013. Variation and genetic control of protein abundance in humans. Nature 499: 79-82.
91. Xu Z, Wei W, Gagneur J, et al. 2009. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nature 457: 1033-1037.
92. Yvert G, Brem RB, Whittle J, et al. 2003. trans-Acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35: 57-64.
93. Zeigler RD, Cohen BA. 2014. Discrimination between thermodynamic models of cis-regulation using transcription factor occupancy data. Nucleic Acids Res 42(4): 2224-2234.