Use of noise in gene expression as an experimental parameter to test phenotypic effects

Yeast

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 209-216

  Liu, Jian ^a   François, Jean Marie ^a   Capp, Jean Pascal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Bet hedging; Evolutionary experiments; Gene expression noise; Phenotypic heterogeneity; Single cell analysis; Stress adaptation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; EXTRINSIC NOISE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; INTRINSIC NOISE; MODULATION; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PARAMETERS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC VARIATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84963973886     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3152     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Acar M, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A. 2008. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat Genet 40: 471-475.
2. Ackermann M. 2015. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 13: 497-508.
3. Anderson MZ, Gerstein AC, Wigen L, et al. 2014. Silencing is noisy: population and cell level noise in telomere-adjacent genes is dependent on telomere position and sir2. PLoS Genet 10: e1004436.
4. Ansel J, Bottin H, Rodriguez-Beltran C, et al. 2008. Cell-to-cell stochastic variation in gene expression is a complex genetic trait. PLoS Genet 4: e1000049.
5. Avery SV. 2006. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 577-587.
6. Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, et al. 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305: 1622-1625.
7. Bar-Even A, Paulsson J, Maheshri N, et al. 2006. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet 38: 636-643.
8. Batada NN, Hurst LD. 2007. Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise. Nat Genet 39: 945-949.
9. Beaumont HJ, Gallie J, Kost C, et al. 2009. Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462: 90-93.
10. Becskei A, Kaufmann BB, van Oudenaarden A. 2005. Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression. Nat Genet 37: 937-944.
11. Blake WJ, Balazsi G, Kohanski MA, et al. 2006. Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Mol Cell 24: 853-865.
12. Blake WJ, Kaern M, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. 2003. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422: 633-637.
13. Burga A, Casanueva MO, Lehner B. 2011. Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 480: 250-253.
14. Carey LB, van Dijk D, Sloot PM, et al. 2013. Promoter sequence determines the relationship between expression level and noise. PLoS Biol 11: e1001528.
15. Chalancon G, Ravarani CN, Balaji S, et al. 2012. Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. Trends Genet 28: 221-232.
16. Colman-Lerner A, Gordon A, Serra E, et al. 2005. Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 437: 699-706.
17. Delvigne F, Zune Q, Lara AR, et al. 2014. Metabolic variability in bioprocessing: implications of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity. Trends Biotechnol 32: 608-616.
18. Dey SS, Foley JE, Limsirichai P, et al. 2015. Orthogonal control of expression mean and variance by epigenetic features at different genomic loci. Mol Syst Biol 11: 806.
19. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297: 1183-1186.
20. Fehrmann S, Bottin-Duplus H, Leonidou A, et al. 2013. Natural sequence variants of yeast environmental sensors confer cell-to-cell expression variability. Mol Syst Biol 9: 695.
21. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Giaever G, et al. 2004. Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol 2: e137.
22. Guantes R, Rastrojo A, Neves R, et al. 2015. Global variability in gene expression and alternative splicing is modulated by mitochondrial content. Genome Res 25: 633-644.
23. Halme A, Bumgarner S, Styles C, Fink GR. 2004. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of the FLO gene family generates cell-surface variation in yeast. Cell 116: 405-415.
24. Holland SL, Reader T, Dyer PS, Avery SV. 2014. Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress. Environ Microbiol 16: 1729-1740.
25. Hornung G, Bar-Ziv R, Rosin D, et al. 2012. Noise-mean relationship in mutated promoters. Genome Res 22: 2409-2417.
26. Huh D, Paulsson J. 2011. Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division. Nat Genet 43: 95-100.
27. Ito Y, Toyota H, Kaneko K, Yomo T. 2009. How selection affects phenotypic fluctuation. Mol Syst Biol 5: 264.
28. Kaern M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, Collins JJ. 2005. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 6: 451-464.
29. Keren L, van Dijk D, Weingarten-Gabbay S, et al. 2015. Noise in gene expression is coupled to growth rate. Genome Res 25: 1893-1902.
30. Kitada T, Kuryan BG, Tran NN, et al. 2012. Mechanism for epigenetic variegation of gene expression at yeast telomeric heterochromatin. Genes Dev 26: 2443-2455.
31. Kussell E, Leibler S. 2005. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309: 2075-2078.
32. Lehner B. 2008. Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Mol Syst Biol 4: 170.
33. Lehner B. 2010. Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1001185.
34. Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegal ML. 2012. Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 10: e1001325.
35. Liu J, Martin-Yken H, Bigey F, et al. 2015. Natural yeast promoter variants reveal epistasis in the generation of transcriptional-mediated noise and its potential benefit in stressful conditions. Genome Biol Evol 7: 969-984.
36. Maamar H, Raj A, Dubnau D. 2007. Noise in gene expression determines cell fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science 317: 526-529.
37. Metzger BP, Yuan DC, Gruber JD, et al. 2015. Selection on noise constrains variation in a eukaryotic promoter. Nature 521: 344-347.
38. Munsky B, Neuert G, van Oudenaarden A. 2012. Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 336: 183-187.
39. Murphy KF, Balazsi G, Collins JJ. 2007. Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 12726-12731.
40. New AM, Cerulus B, Govers SK, et al. 2014. Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments. PLoS Biol 12: e1001764.
41. Newman JR, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, et al. 2006. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441: 840-846.
42. Octavio LM, Gedeon K, Maheshri N. 2009. Epigenetic and conventional regulation is distributed among activators of FLO11 allowing tuning of population-level heterogeneity in its expression. PLoS Genet 5: e1000673.
43. Padovan-Merhar O, Raj A. 2013. Using variability in gene expression as a tool for studying gene regulation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 5: 751-759.
44. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A. 2008. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135: 216-226.
45. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. 2004. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304: 1811-1814.
46. Richard M, Yvert G. 2014. How does evolution tune biological noise? Front Genet 5: 374.
47. Rotem E, Loinger A, Ronin I, et al. 2010. Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 12541-12546.
48. Sanchez A, Choubey S, Kondev J. 2013. Regulation of noise in gene expression. Annu Rev Biophys 42: 469-491.
49. Sanchez A, Golding I. 2013. Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression. Science 342: 1188-1193.
50. Sharon E, van Dijk D, Kalma Y, et al. 2014. Probing the effect of promoters on noise in gene expression using thousands of designed sequences. Genome Res 24: 1698-1706.
51. Silander OK, Nikolic N, Zaslaver A, et al. 2012. A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 8: e1002443.
52. Small EC, Xi L, Wang JP, et al. 2014. Single-cell nucleosome mapping reveals the molecular basis of gene expression heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E2462-2471.
53. Smith MC, Sumner ER, Avery SV. 2007. Glutathione and Gts1p drive beneficial variability in the cadmium resistances of individual yeast cells. Mol Microbiol 66: 699-712.
54. Swain PS, Elowitz MB, Siggia ED. 2002. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 12795-12800.
55. Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A. 2004. Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167: 523-530.
56. To TL, Maheshri N. 2010. Noise can induce bimodality in positive transcriptional feedback loops without bistability. Science 327: 1142-1145.
57. Trcek T, Chao JA, Larson DR, et al. 2012. Single-mRNA counting using fluorescent in situ hybridization in budding yeast. Nat Protoc 7: 408-419.
58. Venturelli OS, Zuleta I, Murray RM, et al. 2015. Population diversification in a yeast metabolic program promotes anticipation of environmental shifts. PLoS Biol 13: e1002042.
59. Viney M, Reece SE. 2013. Adaptive noise. Proc Biol Sci 280 20131104.
60. Vinuelas J, Kaneko G, Coulon A, et al. 2013. Quantifying the contribution of chromatin dynamics to stochastic gene expression reveals long, locus-dependent periods between transcriptional bursts. BMC Biol 11: 15.
61. Wakamoto Y, Dhar N, Chait R, et al. 2013. Dynamic persistence of antibiotic-stressed mycobacteria. Science 339: 91-95.
62. Wang J, Atolia E, Hua B, et al. 2015. Natural variation in preparation for nutrient depletion reveals a cost-benefit tradeoff. PLoS Biol 13: e1002041.
63. Weinberger L, Voichek Y, Tirosh I, et al. 2012. Expression noise and acetylation profiles distinguish HDAC functions. Mol Cell 47: 193-202.
64. Yang S, Kim S, Rim Lim Y, et al. 2014. Contribution of RNA polymerase concentration variation to protein expression noise. Nat Commun 5: 4761.
65. Zhang Z, Qian W, Zhang J. 2009. Positive selection for elevated gene expression noise in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 5: 299.
66. Zoller B, Nicolas D, Molina N, Naef F. 2015. Structure of silent transcription intervals and noise characteristics of mammalian genes. Mol Syst Biol 11: 823.
67. Zuleta IA, Aranda-Diaz A, Li H, El-Samad H. 2014. Dynamic characterization of growth and gene expression using high-throughput automated flow cytometry. Nat Methods 11: 443-448.