Selection on noise constrains variation in a eukaryotic promoter

Nature

Volumn 521, Issue 7552, 2015, Pages 344-347

  Metzger, Brian P H ^a   Yuan, David C ^a   Gruber, Jonathan D ^a   Duveau, Fabien ^a   Wittkopp, Patricia J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; MUTATION; NOISE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM;

ARTICLE; EUKARYOTE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POINT MUTATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PURIFYING SELECTION; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TDH3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (PHOSPHORYLATING); MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84930221731     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14244     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Smith, J. D., McManus, K. F. & Fraser, H. B. A novel test for selection on cis-regulatory elements reveals positive and negative selection acting onmammalian transcriptional enhancers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2509-2518 (2013).
2. Denver, D. R. et al. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Genet. 37, 544-548 (2005).
3. Stoltzfus, A. & Yampolsky, L. Y. Climbing mount probable: mutation as a cause of nonrandomness in evolution. J. Hered. 100, 637-647 (2009).
4. Rice, D. P. D. & Townsend, J. P. J. A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data. Genetics 190, 1533-1545 (2012).
5. Raser, J. M. & O'Shea, E. K. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304, 1811-1814 (2004).
6. McAlister, L. & Holland, M. J. Differential expression of the three yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15019-15027 (1985).
7. Pierce, S. E., Davis, R. W., Nislow, C. & Giaever, G. Genome-wide analysis of barcoded Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion mutants in pooled cultures. Nature Protocols 2, 2958-2974 (2007).
8. Ringel, A. E. et al. Yeast Tdh3 (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is a Sir2-interacting factor that regulates transcriptional silencing and rDNA recombination. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003871 (2013).
9. Gruber, J. D., Vogel, K., Kalay, G. & Wittkopp, P. J. Contrasting properties of gene-specific regulatory, coding, and copy number mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: frequency, effects and dominance. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002497 (2012).
10. Liti, G. et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337-341 (2009).
11. Schacherer, J., Shapiro, J. A., Ruderfer, D. M. & Kruglyak, L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458, 342-345 (2009).
12. Lynch, M. et al. A genome-wide view of the spectrum ofspontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9272-9277 (2008).
13. Patwardhan, R. P. et al. High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 1173-1175 (2009).
14. Melnikov, A. et al. Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 271-279 (2012).
15. Patwardhan, R. P. et al. Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 265-270 (2012).
16. Kwasnieski, J. & Mogno, I. Complex effects of nucleotide variants in a mammalian cis-regulatory element. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19498-19503 (2012).
17. Yagi, S., Yagi, K., Fukuoka, J. & Suzuki, M. The UAS of the yeast GAPDH promoter consists of multiple general functional elements including RAP1 and GRF2 binding sites. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 56, 235-244 (1994).
18. Baker, H. V. et al. Characterization of the DNA-binding activity of GCR1: in vivo evidence for two GCR1-binding sitesinthe upstreamactivating sequenceofTPI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2690-2700 (1992).
19. Hornung, G. et al. Noise-meanrelation shipinmutated promoters. GenomeRes. 22, 2409-2417 (2012).
20. Lehner, B. Selectionto minimise noise inliving systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 1-6 (2008).
21. Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Giaever, G., Kumm, J. & Eisen, M. B. Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLos Biol. 2, 834-838 (2004).
22. Wang, Z. & Zhang, J. Impactofgeneexpressionnoiseonorganismalfitnessandthe efficacy of natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E67-E76 (2011).
23. Newman, J. R. S. et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441, 840-846 (2006).
24. Batada, N. & Hurst, L. Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise. Nature Genet. 39, 945-949 (2007).
25. Zhang, Z., Qian, W. & Zhang, J. Positive selection for elevated gene expression noise in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 1-12 (2009).
26. Frankel, N. et al. Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466, 1-5 (2010).
27. Perry, M. W., Boettiger, A. N., Bothma, J. P. & Levine, M. Shadow enhancers foster robustness of Drosophila gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 20, 1562-1567 (2010).
28. Fontana, W. & Buss, L. ''The arrival of the fittest'': toward a theory of biological organization. Bull. Math. Biol. 56, 1-64 (1994).
29. De Vries, H. Species and Varieties, Their Origin by Mutation 825-826 (Open Court, 1905).
30. Taly, J.-F. et al. Using the T-Coffee package to build multiple sequence alignments of protein, RNA, DNA sequences and 3D structures. Nature Protocols 6, 1669-1682 (2011).
31. Löytynoja, A. & Goldman, N. webPRANK: a phylogeny-aware multiple sequence aligner with interactive alignment browser. BMC Bioinform. 11, 579 (2010).
32. Libkind, D. et al. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stockoflager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 14539-14544 (2011).
33. Scannell, D. R. et al. The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 1, 11-25 (2011).
34. Liti, G. et al. High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome. BMC Genom. 14, 69 (2013).
35. Wang, Q.-M., Liu, W.-Q., Liti, G., Wang, S.-A. & Bai, F.-Y. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5404-5417 (2012).
36. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729 (2013).
37. Clement, M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1657-1659 (2000).
38. Ashkenazy, H., Erez, E., Martz, E., Pupko, T. & Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservationinsequence and structureofproteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W529-W533 (2010).
39. Hittinger, C. T. Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus. Trends Genet. 29, 309-317 (2013).
40. Wittkopp, P. J., Haerum, B. K. & Clark, A. G. Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature 430, 85-88 (2004).
41. Wittkopp, P. J. in Molecular Methods for Evolutionary Genetics Vol. 772 (eds Orgogozo, V. & Rockman, M. V.) 297-317 (Humana, 2011).
42. Gietz, R. & Woods, R. inMethodsinMolecular Biology 2nd edn, Vol. 313 (ed. Xiao, W.) 107-120 (Springer, 2006).
43. Kudla, G., Murray, A., Tollervey, D. & Plotkin, J. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324, 255-258 (2009).
44. Lo, K., Hahne, F., Brinkman, R. R. & Gottardo, R. flowClust: a Bioconductor package for automated gating of flow cytometry data. BMC Bioinform. 10, 145 (2009).
45. Hahne, F. et al. flowCore: a Bioconductor package for high throughput flow cytometry. BMC Bioinform. 10, 106 (2009).
46. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2013).