Natural Variation in Preparation for Nutrient Depletion Reveals a Cost–Benefit Tradeoff

PLoS Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wang, Jue ^a   Atolia, Esha ^a   Hua, Bo ^a   Savir, Yonatan ^a   Escalante Chong, Renan ^a   Springer, Michael ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; CULTURE MEDIUM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBON SOURCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CULTURE MEDIUM; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INDUCTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; GROWTH CURVE; GROWTH INHIBITION; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT LIMITATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STEADY STATE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FUNGAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CULTURE MEDIA; ENERGY METABOLISM; GALACTOSE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 84922216819     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002041     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Dekel E, Alon U, (2005) Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436: 588–592. doi: 10.1038/nature03842
2. Poelwijk FJ, de Vos MGJ, Tans SJ, (2011) Tradeoffs and optimality in the evolution of gene regulation. Cell 146: 462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.035 21802129
3. Lang GI, Murray AW, Botstein D, (2009) The cost of gene expression underlies a fitness trade-off in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5755–5760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901620106 19299502
4. Scott M, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T, Gunderson CW, (2010) Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 330: 1099–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1192588 21097934
5. Perkins TJ, Swain PS, (2009) Strategies for cellular decision-making. Mol Syst Biol 5: 326. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.83 19920811
6. Dienert F, (1900) Sur la fermentation du galactose et sur l’accoutumance des levures à ce sucre Faculté des sciences de Paris. Sceaux: E. Charaire.
7. Gancedo JM, (1998) Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 334–361. 9618445
8. Monod J, (1942) Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bacteriennes. Paris: Hermann.
9. Johnston M, Flick JS, Pextont T, (1994) multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 14: 3834–3841. doi: 10.1128/MCB.14.6.3834.Updated 8196626
10. Lohr D, Venkov P, Zlatanova J, Program B, Academy B, (1995) Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network. FASEB J 9: 777–787. 7601342
11. Bhat PJ, (2008) Galactose regulon of yeast: from genetics to systems biology. Berlin: Springer.
12. Magasanik B, (1961) Catabolite repression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 26: 249–256. doi: 10.1101/SQB.1961.026.01.031 14468226
13. Görke B, Stülke J, (2008) Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 613–624. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1932 18628769
14. MacLean RC, (2007) Pleiotropy and GAL pathway degeneration in yeast. J Evol Biol 20: 1333–1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01351.x 17584228
15. Friesen ML, Saxer G, Travisano M, Doebeli M, (2004) Experimental evidence for sympatric ecological diversification due to frequency-dependent competition in Escherichia coli. Evolution 58: 245–260. doi: 10.1554/03-369 15068343
16. Spencer CC, Bertrand M, Travisano M, Doebeli M, (2007) Adaptive diversification in genes that regulate resource use in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 3: e15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030015 17238290
17. New AM, Cerulus B, Govers SK, Perez-Samper G, Zhu B, et al. (2014) Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments. PLoS Biol 12: e1001764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001764 24453942
18. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337–341. doi: 10.1038/nature07743 19212322
19. Cromie G a, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL, Garmendia-Torres C, Gilbert TL, et al. (2013) Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 2163–2171. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007492
20. Hinnebusch AG, (2005) Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 59: 407–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833 16153175
21. Acar M, Pando BF, Arnold FH, Elowitz MB, van Oudenaarden A, (2010) A general mechanism for network-dosage compensation in gene circuits. Science 329: 1656–1660. doi: 10.1126/science.1190544 20929850
22. Acar M, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A, (2005) Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 435: 228. doi: 10.1038/nature03524 15889097
23. Venturelli OS, Zuleta I, Murray RM, (2014) Population diversification in a yeast metabolic program promotes anticipation of environmental shifts. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/002907
24. Solopova A, van Gestel J, Weissing FJ, Bachmann H, Teusink B, et al. (2014) Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 7427–7432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320063111 24799698
25. Nehlin JO, Carlberg M, Ronne H, (1991) Control of yeast GAL genes by MIG1 repressor: a transcriptional cascade in the glucose response. EMBO J 10: 3373–3377. 1915298
26. McIsaac RS, Silverman SJ, McClean MN, Gibney PA, Macinskas J, et al. (2011) Fast-acting and nearly gratuitous induction of gene expression and protein depletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 22: 4447–4459. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0466 21965290
27. Quintero MJ, Maya D, Arévalo-Rodríguez M, Cebolla A, Chávez S, (2007) An improved system for estradiol-dependent regulation of gene expression in yeast. Microb Cell Fact 6: 10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-6-10 17374163
28. Parthun R, Jaehnings JA, (1990) Purification and characterization of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. J Biol Chem 265: 209–213. 2403556
29. Hashimoto H, Kikuchi Y, Nogi Y, Fukasawa T, (1983) Regulation of expression of the galactose gene cluster in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Isolation and characterization of the regulatory gene GAL4. Mol Gen Genet 191: 31–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00330886 6350827
30. Malakar P, Venkatesh KV, (2013) GAL regulon of Saccharomyces cerevisiae performs optimally to maximize growth on galactose. FEMS Yeast Res: 1–11. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12109
31. Biggar SR, Crabtree GR, (2001) Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses. EMBO J 20: 3167–3176. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.12.3167 11406593
32. DeRisi JL, (1997) Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278: 680–686. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.680 9381177
33. Slavov N, Budnik BA, Schwab D, Airoldi EM, van Oudenaarden A, (2014) Constant growth rate can be supported by decreasing energy flux and increasing aerobic glycolysis. Cell Rep 7: 705–714. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.057 24767987
34. Tagkopoulos I, Liu Y-C, Tavazoie S, (2008) Predictive behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science 320: 1313–1317. doi: 10.1126/science.1154456 18467556
35. Mitchell A, Romano GH, Groisman B, Yona A, Dekel E, et al. (2009) Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms. Nature 460: 220–224. doi: 10.1038/nature08112 19536156
36. Mitchell A, Pilpel Y, (2011) A mathematical model for adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 7271–7276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019754108 21487001
37. Shoval O, Sheftel H, Shinar G, Hart Y, Ramote O, et al. (2012) Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space. Science 336: 1157–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.1217405 22539553
38. Arnoldini M, Vizcarra IA, Peña-Miller R, Stocker N, Diard M, et al. (2014) Bistable expression of virulence genes in salmonella leads to the formation of an antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation. PLoS Biol 12: e1001928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001928 25136970
39. Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegal ML, (2012) Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 10: e1001325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001325 22589700
40. Fridman O, Goldberg A, Ronin I, Shoresh N, Balaban NQ, (2014) Optimization of lag time underlies antibiotic tolerance in evolved bacterial populations. Nature 513: 418–421. doi: 10.1038/nature13469 25043002
41. Healey D, Gore J, (2014) Phenotypic heterogeneity implements a game theoretic mixed strategy in a clonal microbial population. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/011049
42. Boulineau S, Tostevin F, Kiviet DJ, ten Wolde PR, Nghe P, et al. (2013) Single-cell dynamics reveals sustained growth during diauxic shifts. PLoS ONE 8: e61686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061686 23637881
43. Kotte O, Volkmer B, Radzikowski JL, Heinemann M, (2014) Phenotypic bistability in Escherichia coli’s central carbon metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 10: 736. doi: 10.15252/msb.20135022 24987115
44. Brown JCS, Lindquist S, (2009) A heritable switch in carbon source utilization driven by an unusual yeast prion. Genes Dev 23: 2320–2332. doi: 10.1101/gad.1839109 19797769
45. Zacharioudakis I, Gligoris T, Tzamarias D, (2007) A yeast catabolic enzyme controls transcriptional memory. Curr Biol 17: 2041–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.044 17997309
46. Jarosz DF, Lancaster AK, Brown JCS, Lindquist S, (2014) An evolutionarily conserved prion-like element converts wild fungi from metabolic specialists to generalists. Cell 158: 1072–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.024 25171408
47. Jarosz DF, Brown JCS, Walker GA, Datta MS, Ung WL, et al. (2014) Cross-kingdom chemical communication drives a heritable, mutually beneficial prion-based transformation of metabolism. Cell 158: 1083–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.025 25171409
48. Mortimer RK, Romano P, Suzzi G, Polsinelli M, (1994) Genome renewal: a new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts. Yeast 10: 1543–1552. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101203 7725789
49. Fay JC, Benavides JA, (2005) Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 1: 66–71. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010005 16103919
50. Bergström A, Simpson JT, Salinas F, Barré B, Parts L, et al. (2014) A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol Biol Evol 31: 872–888. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu037 24425782
51. Baganz F, Hayes A, Marren D, Gardner DC, Oliver SG, (1997) Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 1563–1573. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199712)13:16%3C1563::AID-YEA240%3E3.3.CO;2-Y 9509575
52. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, et al. (1998) Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2%3C115::AID-YEA204%3E3.0.CO;2-2 9483801
53. Gietz RD, Woods R a, (2002) Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol 350: 87–96. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)50957-5 12073338
54. Gordon A, Colman-Lerner A, Chin TE, Benjamin KR, Yu RC, et al. (2007) Single-cell quantification of molecules and rates using open-source microscope-based cytometry. 4: 175–181. doi: 10.1038/NMETH1008 17237792
55. Ku HH, (1966) Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. 79: 75–79.
56. Wang J, Atolia E, Hua B, Savir Y, Escalante-Chong R, et al. (2014) Data from: Natural variation in preparation for nutrient depletion reveals a cost–benefit tradeoff. PLoS Biology. Dryad Digital Repository. doi: 10.5061/dryad.39h5m