Adaptive noise

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1767, 2013, Pages

  Viney, Mark ^a   Reece, Sarah E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bet hedging; Evolution; Variation

Indexed keywords

BET-HEDGING; ERROR ANALYSIS; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; NOISE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84896059789     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1104     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Spudich JL, Koshland DE. 1976 Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262, 467-471. (doi:10.1038/262467a0)
2. Lestas I, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J. 2010 Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467, 174-178. (doi:10.1038/ nature09333)
3. Munsky B, Neuert G, van Oudenaarden A. 2012 Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 336, 183-187. (doi:10.1126/ science.1216379)
4. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002 Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183-1186. (doi:10.1126/science.1070919)
5. Dubnau D, Losick R. 2006 Bistability in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 564-572. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05249. x)
6. DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM. 2004 Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Stewart-Ornstein J, Weissman JS, El-Samad H. 2012 Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. 45, 483-493. (doi:10.1016/j. molcel.2011.11.035)
8. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A. 2008 Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135, 216-226. (doi:10.1016/j. cell.2008.09.050)
9. Shahrezaei V, Swain PS. 2008 The stochastic nature of biochemical networks. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 19, 369-374. (doi:10.1016/j. copbio.2008.06.011)
10. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. 2004 Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304, 1811-1814. (doi:10.1126/science.1098641)
11. Larson DR, Singer RH, Zenklusen D. 2009 A single molecule view of gene expression. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 630-637. (doi:10.1016/j. tcb.2009.08.008)
12. Singh A. 2011 Negative feedback through mRNA provides the best control of gene-expression noise. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 10, 194-200. (doi:10.1109/ TNB.2011.2168826)
13. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Giaever G, Kumm J, Eisen MB. 2004 Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol. 2, e137. (doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0020137)
14. Ansel J, Bottin H, Rodriguez-Beltran C, Damon C, Nagarajan M, Fehrmann S, Francois J, Yvert G. 2008 Cell-to-cell stochastic variation in gene expression is a complex genetic trait. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000049. (doi:10.1371/journal. pgen.1000049)
15. Jimenez-Gomez JM, Corwin JA, Joseph B, Maloof JN, Kliebenstein DJ. 2011 Genomic analysis of QTLs and genes altering natural variation in stochastic noise. PLoS Genet. 7, e10002295. (doi:10.1371/ journal. pgen.1002295)
16. Silander OK, Nikolic N, Zaslaver A, Bren A, Kikoin I, Alon U, Ackermann M. 2012 A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002443. (doi:10. 1371/journal. pgen.1002443)
17. Lehner B. 2010 Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001185. (doi:10.1371/ journal. pgen.1001185)
18. Alon U. 2007 Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 450-461. (doi:10.1038/nrg2102)
19. Austin DW, Allen MS, McCollum JM, Dar RD, Wilgus JR, Sayler GS, Samatova NF, Cox CD, Simpson ML. 2006 Gene network shaping of inherent noise spectra. Nature 439, 608-611. (doi:10.1038/ nature04194)
20. Blake WJ, Balazsi G, Kohanski MA, Isaacs FJ, Murphy KF, Kuang Y, Cantor CR, Walt DR, Collins JJ. 2006 Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Mol. Cell. 24, 853-865. (doi:10.1016/j. molcel.2006.11.003)
21. Silva-Rocha R, de Lorenzo V. 2010 Noise and robustness in prokaryotic regulatory networks. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 257-275. (doi:10.1146/annurev. micro.091208.073229)
22. Locke JCW, Young JW, Fontes M, Jimenez MJH, Elowitz MB. 2011 Stochastic pulse regulation in bacterial stress response. Science 334, 366-369. (doi:10.1126/science.1208144)
23. Çaǧatay T, Turcotte M, Elowitz MB, Garci-Ojalvo J, Süel GM. 2009 Architecture-dependent noise discriminates functionally analogous differentiation circuits. Cell 139, 512-522. (doi:10.1016/j. cell. 2009.07.046)
24. Ferea TL, Botstein D, Brown PO, Rosenzweig RF. 1999 Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9721-9726. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.96.17.9721)
25. Stern S, Dror T, Stolovicki E, Brenner N, Braun E. 2007 Genome-wide transcriptional plasticity underlies cellular adaptation to novel challenge. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 106. (doi:10.1038/ msb4100147)
26. Zhang X-S, Hill WG. 2005 Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity. Evolution 59, 1237-1244. (doi:10.1554/05-038)
27. Yang J et al. 2012 FTO genotype is associated with phenotpyic variability of body mass index. Nature 490, 267-272. (doi:10.1038/nature11401)
28. Paliwal S, Iglesias PA, Campbell K, Hilioti Z, Groisman A, Levchenko A. 2007 MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast. Nature 446, 46-51. (doi:10.1038/ nature05561)
29. Lehner B. 2008 Selection to minimize noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 170. (doi:10. 1038/msb.2008.11)
30. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, Weissman JS. 2006 Singlecell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature, 441, 840-846. (doi:10.1038/nature04785)
31. Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE. 2007 The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 831-844. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007. 01300. x)
32. Perkins TJ, Swain PS. 2009 Strategies for cellular decision-making. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 326. (doi:10. 1038/msb.2009.83)
33. Libby E, Perkins TJ, Swain PS. 2007 Noisy information processing through transcriptional regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7151-7156. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0608963104)
34. Balazsi G, van Oudenaarden A, Collins JJ. 2011 Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell 144, 910-925. (doi:10. 1016/j. cell.2011.01.030)
35. Ray JCJ, Tabor JJ, Igoshin OA. 2011 Nontranscriptional regulatory processes shape transcriptional network dynamics. Nat. Rev. Micro. 9, 817-828. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro2667)
36. Acar M, Becskel A, van Oudenaarden A. 2005 Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 435, 228-232. (doi:10.1038/nature03524)
37. Losick R, Desplan C. 2008 Stochasticity and cell fate. Science 320, 65068. (doi:10.1126/science.1147888)
38. Johnston RJ, Desplan C. 2010 Stochastic mechanisms of cell fate specification that yield random or robust outcomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 689-719. (doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104113)
39. Raj A, Rifkin SA, Andersen E, van Oudenaarden A. 2010 Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 463, 913-918. (doi:10.1038/nature08781)
40. Corson F, Siggia ED. 2012 Geometry, epistasis, and developmental patterning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5568-5575. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1201505109)
41. Casanueva MO, Burga A, Lehner B. 2012 Fitness trade-offs and environmentally induced mutation buffering in isogenic C. elegans. Science 335, 82-85. (doi:10.1126/science.1213491)
42. Burga A, Casanueva MO, Lehner B. 2011 Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 480, 250-253. (doi:10.1038/nature10665)
43. Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A. 2004 Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167, 523-530. (doi:10.1534/genetics.167. 1.523)
44. Kussell E, Leibler S. 2005 Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309, 2075-2078. (doi:10. 1126/science.1114383)
45. Birtwistle MR, Rauch J, Kiyatkin A, Aksamitiene E, Dobrzynski M, Hoek JB, Kolch W, Ogunnaike BA, Kholodenko BN. 2012 Emergence of bimodal population responses from the interplay between analog single-cell signaling and protein expression noise. BMC Syst. Bio. 6, 109. (doi:10.1186/1752-0509-6-109)
46. Beaumont HJE, Gallie J, Kost C, Ferguson GC, Rainey PB. 2009 Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462, 90-93. (doi:10.1038/nature08504)
47. Diard M, Garcia V, Maier L, Remus-Emsermann MNP, Regoes RR, Ackermann M, Hardt W-D. 2013 Stabilization of cooperative virulence by the expression of an avirulent phenotype. Nature 494, 353-356. (doi:10.1038/nature11913)
48. Acar M, Mettetal J, van Oudenaarden A. 2008 Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat. Genet. 40, 471-475. (doi:10.1038/ng.110)
49. Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegel ML. 2012 Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001325. (doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.1001325)
50. Gillespie JH. 1974 Natural selection for withingeneration variance in offspring number. Genetics 76, 601-606.
51. Gillespie JH. 1977 Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. Am. Nat. 111, 1010-1014. (doi:10.1086/283230)
52. Simons A. 2011 Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1601-1609. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0176)
53. de Jong IG, Haccou P, Kuipers OP. 2011 Bet hedging or not? A guide to proper classification of microbial strategies. Bioessays 33, 215-223. (doi:10.1002/ bies.201000127)