A structure-centric view of protein evolution, design, and adaptation

Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology

Volumn 75, Issue , 2007, Pages 133-191

  Deeds, Eric J ^a   Shakhnovich, Eugene I ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84960286082     PISSN: 0065258X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Anfinsen, C. B. (1973). Principles that govern the folding of protein chains, Science, 181: 223.
2. Chothia, C. (1992). Proteins: one thousand families for the molecular biologist, Nature, 357: 543.
3. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures, J. Mol. Biol., 247: 536.
4. Orengo, C. A., Todd, A. E., and Thornton, J. M. (1999). From protein structure to function, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 9: 374.
5. Thornton, J. M., Orengo, C. A., Todd, A. E., and Pearl, F. M. (1999). Protein folds, functions and evolution, J. Mol. Biol., 293: 333.
6. Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I., and Karev, G. P. (2002). The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution, Nature, 420: 218.
7. Orengo, C. A., Bray, J. E., Buchan, D. W., Harrison, A., Lee, D., Pearl, F. M., Sillitoe, I., Todd, A. E., and Thornton, J. M. (2002). The CATH protein family database: a resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes, Proteomics, 2: 11.
8. Dietmann, S., and Holm, L. (2001). Identification of homology in protein structure classification, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8: 953.
9. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1996). The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 24: 206.
10. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1993). Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices, J. Mol. Biol., 233: 123.
11. Wilson, C. A., Kreychman, J., and Gerstein, M. (2000). Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores, J. Mol. Biol., 297: 233.
12. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool, J. Mol. Biol., 215: 403.
13. Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D. J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res., 25: 3389.
14. Getz, G., Vendruscolo, M., Sachs, D., and Domany, E. (2002). Automated assignment of SCOP and CATH protein structure classifications from FSSP scores, Proteins, 46: 405.
15. Shakhnovich, B. E., and Max Harvey, J. (2004). Quantifying structure-function uncertainty: a graph theoretical exploration into the origins and limitations of protein annotation, J. Mol. Biol., 337: 933.
16. Finkelstein, A. V., Gutun, A. M., and Badretdinov, A. (1993). Why are the same protein folds used to perform different functions? FEBS Lett., 325: 23.
17. Finkelstein, A. V., Badretdinov, A., and Gutin, A. M. (1995). Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins, 23: 142.
18. Finkelstein, A. V., Gutin, A. M., and Badretdinov, A. (1995). Boltzmann-like statistics of protein architectures: origins and consequences, Subcell Biochem., 24: 1.
19. Orengo, C. A., Jones, D. T., and Thornton, J. M. (1994). Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds, Nature, 372: 631.
20. Zhang, C. T. (1997). Relations of the numbers of protein sequences, families and folds, Protein Eng., 10: 757.
21. Zhang, C., and DeLisi, C. (1998). Estimating the number of protein folds, J. Mol. Biol., 284: 1301.
22. Wang, Z. X. (1998). A re-estimation for the total numbers of protein folds and superfamilies, Protein Eng., 11: 621.
23. Govindarajan, S., Recabarren, R., and Goldstein, R. A. (1999). Estimating the total number of protein folds, Proteins, 35: 408.
24. Wolf, Y. I., Grishin, N. V., and Koonin, E. V. (2000). Estimating the number of protein folds and families from complete genome data, J. Mol. Biol., 299: 897.
25. Lesk, A. M., Lo Conte, L., and Hubbard, T. J. (2001). Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and interresidue contacts, Proteins, Suppl 5, 98.
26. Qian, J., Luscombe, N. M., and Gerstein, M. (2001). Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model, J. Mol. Biol., 313: 673.
27. Luscombe, N. M., Qian, J., Zhang, Z., Johnson, T., and Gerstein, M. (2002). The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties, Genome Biol., 3: RESEARCH0040.
28. Karev, G. P., Wolf, Y. I., Rzhetsky, A. Y., Berezovskaya, F. S., and Koonin, E. V. (2002). Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior, BMC Evol. Biol., 2: 18.
29. Rzhetsky, A., and Gomez, S. M. (2001) Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome, Bioinformatics, 17: 988.
30. Dokholyan, N. V., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2001). Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles, J. Mol. Biol., 312: 289.
31. Mirny, L. A., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (1999). Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function, J. Mol. Biol., 291: 177.
32. Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C., and Wingreen, N. (1996). Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding, Science, 273: 666.
33. Dokholyan, N. V., Shakhnovich, B., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2002). Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99: 14132.
34. Albert, R., and Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 74: 47.
35. Barabasi, A. L., and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286: 509.
36. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabasi, A. L., and Oltvai, Z. N. (2001). Lethality and centrality in protein networks, Nature, 411: 41.
37. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabasi, A. L. (2000). The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature, 407: 651.
38. Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks, Science, 297: 1551.
39. Yook, S. H., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabasi, A. L. (2004). Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks, Proteomics, 4: 928.
40. Krapivsky, P. L., Rodgers, G. J., and Redner, S. (2001). Degree distributions of growing networks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86: 5401.
41. Shakhnovich, E. I., and Gutin, A. (1990). Enumeration of all compact conformations of copolymers with random sequence links, J. Chem. Phys., 93: 5967.
42. Mirny, L., and Shakhnovich, E. (2001). Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 30: 361.
43. Shakhnovich, E. I., and Gutin, A. M. (1990). Implications of thermodynamics of protein folding for evolution of primary sequences, Nature, 346: 773.
44. Gutin, A. M., Abkevich, V. I., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (1995). Evolution-like selection of fast-folding model proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92: 1282.
45. Goldstein, R. A., Luthey-Schulten, Z. A., and Wolynes, P. G. (1992). Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89: 4918.
46. Chan, H. S., and Bornberg-Bauer, E. (2002). Perspectives on protein evolution from simple exact models, Appl. Bioinf., 1: 121.
47. Xia, Y., and Levitt, M. (2004). Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 14: 202.
48. Dinner, A. R., Abkevich, V., Shakhnovich, E., and Karplus, M. (1999). Factors that affect the folding ability of proteins, Proteins, 35: 34.
49. Bryngelson, J. D., and Wolynes, P. G. (1987). Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A., 84: 7524.
50. Bryngelson, J. D., and Wolynes, P. G. (1989). Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy-model (with applications to protein folding), J. Phys. Chem., 93: 6902.
51. Shakhnovich, E. I., and Gutin, A. M. (1989). Formation of unique structure in polypeptide chains: theoretical investigation with the aid of a replica approach, Biophys. Chem., 34: 187.
52. Bornberg-Bauer, E. (1997). How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? Biophys. J., 73: 2393.
53. Bornberg-Bauer, E., and Chan, H. S. (1999). Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96: 10689.
54. Xia, Y., and Levitt, M. (2004). Funnel-like organization in sequence space determines the distributions of protein stability and folding rate preferred by evolution, Proteins, 55: 107.
55. Fontana, W. (2002). Modelling "evo-devo" with RNA, Bioessays, 24: 1164.
56. Fontana, W., and Schuster, P. (1998). Continuity in evolution: on the nature of transitions, Science, 280: 1451.
57. Bornberg-Bauer, E. (2002). Randomness, structural uniqueness, modularity, and neutral evolution in sequence space of model proteins, Z. Phys. Chem., 216: 139.
58. Cui, Y., Wong, W. H., Bornberg-Bauer, E., and Chan, H. S. (2002). Recombinatoric exploration of novel folded structures: a heteropolymer-based model of protein evolutionary landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99: 809.
59. Taverna, D. M., and Goldstein, R. A. (2000). The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations, Biopolymers, 53: 1.
60. Taverna, D. M., and Goldstein, R. A. (2002). Why are proteins so robust to site mutations? J. Mol. Biol., 315: 479.
61. Taverna, D. M., and Goldstein, R. A. (2002). Why are proteins marginally stable? Proteins, 46: 105.
62. Blackburne, B. P., and Hirst, J. D. (2001). Evolution of functional model proteins, J. Chem. Phys., 115: 1935.
63. Blackburne, B. P., and Hirst, J. D. (2003). Three-dimensional functional model proteins: structure, function and evolution, J. Chem. Phys., 119: 3453.
64. Hirst, J. D. (1999). The evolutionary landscape of functional model proteins, Protein Eng., 12: 721.
65. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1996). Mapping the protein universe, Science, 273: 595.
66. Deeds, E.J., Dokholyan, N. V., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2003). Protein evolution within a structural space, Biophys. J., 85: 2962.
67. England, J. L., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2003). Structural determinant of protein designability, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90: 218101.
68. Deeds,E.J., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2005). The emergence of scaling in sequence-based physical models of protein evolution, Biophlys. J., 88: 3905.
69. Mirny, L. A., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (1996). How to derive a protein folding potential: a new approach to an old problem, J. Mol. Biol., 264: 1164.
70. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R. L. (1996). Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading, J. Mol. Biol., 256: 623.
71. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R. L. (1985). Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation, Macromolecules, 18: 534.
72. Tiana, G., Broglia, R. A., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2000). Hiking in the energy landscape in sequence space: a bumpy road to good folders, Proteins, 39: 244.
73. Kim, J., Krapivsky, P. L., Kahng, B., and Redner, S. (2002). Infinite-order percolation and giant fluctuations in a protein interaction network, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 66: 055101.
74. Deeds, E. J., Shakhnovich, B., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2004). Proteomic traces of speciation, J. Mol. Biol., 336: 695.
75. Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree, Science, 284: 2124.
76. Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Lateral genomics, Trends Cell Biol., 9, M5.
77. Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., and Lawrence, J. G. (2002). Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer, Mol. Biol. Evol., 19: 2226.
78. Aravind, L., Tatusov, R. L., Wolf, Y. I., Walker, D. R., and Koonin, E. V. (1998). Evidence for massive gene exchange between archaeal and bacterial hyperthermophiles, Trends Genet., 14: 442.
79. Wolf, Y. I., Brenner, S. E., Bash, P. A., and Koonin, E. V. (1999). Distribution of protein folds in the three superkingdoms of life, Genome Res., 9: 17.
80. Chothia, C., Gough, J., Vogel, C., and Teichmann, S. A. (2003). Evolution of the protein repertoire, Science, 300: 1701.
81. Shakhnovich, B. E., Harvey, J. M., Comeau, S., Lorenz, D., DeLisi, C., and Shakhnovich, E. (2003). ELISA: structure-function inferences based on statistically significant and evolutionarily inspired observations, BMC Bioinf, 4: 34.
82. Lupas, A. N., Punting, C. P., and Russell, R. B. (2001). On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? J. Struct. Biol., 134: 191.
83. Ponting, C. P., and Russell, R. R. (2002). The natural history of protein domains, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 31: 45.
84. Sali, A. (2001). Target practice, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8: 482.
85. Vitkup, D., Melamud, E., Moult, J., and Sander, C. (2001). Completeness in structural genomics, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8: 559.
86. Galperin, M. Y., Walker, D. R., and Koonin, E. V. (1998). Analogous enzymes: independent inventions in enzyme evolution, Genome Res., 8: 779.
87. Wolynes, P. G. (1996). Symmetry and the energy landscapes of biomolecules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93: 14249.
88. Kussell, E. L., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (1999). Analytical approach to the protein design problem, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83: 4437.
89. England, J. L., Shakhnovich, B. E., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2003). Natural selection of more designable folds: a mechanism for thermophilic adaptation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100: 8727.
90. Tiana, G., Shakhnovich, B. E., Dokholyan, N. V., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2004). Imprint of evolution on protein structures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101: 2846.
91. Shakhnovich, B. E., Deeds, E., DeLisi, C., and Shakhnovich, E. (2005). Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology, Genome Res., 15: 385.
92. Giribet, G. (2002). Current advances in the phylogenetic reconstruction of metazoan evolution: a new paradigm for the Cambrian explosion? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 24: 345.
93. Woese, C. R., and Fox, G. E. (1977). Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 74: 5088.
94. Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., and Wheelis, M. L. (1990). Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 87: 4576.
95. Doolittle, W. F., and Brown, J. R. (1994). Tempo, mode, the progenote, and the universal root, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 91: 6721.
96. Baldauf, S. L. (2003). The deep roots of eukaryotes, Science, 300: 1703.
97. Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., Grishin, N. V., and Koonin, E. V. (2002). Genome trees and the tree of life, Trends Genet., 18: 472.
98. Cole, J. R., Chai, B., Marsh, T. L., Farris, R. J., Wang, Q., Kulam, S. A., Chandra, S., McGarrell, D. M., Schmidt, T. M., Garrity, G. M., and Tiedje, J. M. (2003). The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy, Nucleic Acids Res., 31: 442.
99. Tatusov, R. L., Natale, D. A., Garkavtsev, I. V., Tatusova, T. A., Shankavaram, U. T., Rao, B. S., Kiryutin, B., Galperin, M. Y., Fedorova, N. D., and Koonin, E. V. (2001). The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 29: 22.
100. Brown, J. R., Douady, C. J., Italia, M. J., Marshall, W. E., and Stanhope, M. J. (2001). Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets, Nat. Genet., 28: 281.
101. Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., Grishin, N. V., Tatusov, R. L., and Koonin, E. V. (2001). Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades, BMC Evol. Biol., 1: 8.
102. Nesbo, C. L., L'Haridon, S., Stetter, K. O., and Doolittle, W. F. (2001). Phylogenetic analyses of two "archaeal" genes in Thermotoga maritima reveal multiple transfers between Archaea and Bacteria, Mol. Biol. Evol., 18: 362.
103. Jain, R., Rivera, M. C., and Lake, J. A. (1999). Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96: 3801.
104. Lawrence, J. G. (1999). Gene transfer, speciation, and the evolution of bacterial genomes, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2: 519.
105. Korbel, J. O., Snel, B., Huynen, M. A., and Bork, P. (2002). SHOT: a Web server for the construction of genome phylogenies, Trends Genet., 18: 158.
106. Fitz-Gibbon, S. T., and House, C. H. (1999). Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms, Nucleic Acids Res., 27: 4218.
107. House, C. H., and Fitz-Gibbon, S. T. (2002). Using homolog groups to create a whole-genomic tree of free-living organisms: an update, J. Mol. Evol., 54: 539.
108. Brown, J. R., and Doolittle, W. F. (1997). Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 61: 456.
109. Dutilh, B. E., Huynen, M. A., Bruno, W. J., and Snel, B. (2004). The consistent phylogenetic signal in genome trees revealed by reducing the impact of noise, J. Mol. Evol., 58: 527.
110. Clarke, G. D., Beiko, R. G., Ragan, M. A., and Charlebois, R. L. (2002). Inferring genome trees by using a filter to eliminate phylogenetically discordant sequences and a distance matrix based on mean normalized BLASTP scores, J. Bacteriol., 184: 2072.
111. Nesbo, C. L., Boucher, Y., and Doolittle, W. F. (2001). Defining the core of nontransferable prokaryotic genes: the euryarchaeal core, J. Mol. Evol., 53: 340.
112. Lin, J., and Gerstein, M. (2000). Whole-genome trees based on the occurrence of folds and orthologs: implications for comparing genomes on different levels, Genome Res., 10: 808.
113. Caetano-Anollés, G., and Caetano-Anollés, D. (2003). An evolutionarily structured universe of protein architecture, Genome Res., 13: 1563.
114. Deeds, E. J., Hennessey, H., and Shakhnovich, E. I. (2005). Prokaryotic phylogenies inferred from protein structural domains, Genome Res., 15: 393.
115. Farris, J. S. (1977). Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law, Syst. Zool., 26: 77.
116. Swofford, D. L. (2003). Paup*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
117. Mirkin, B. G., Fenner, T. I., Galperin, M. Y., and Koonin, E. V. (2003). Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes, BMC Evol. Biol., 3: 2.
118. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4: 406.
119. Yang, S., Doolittle, R. F., and Bourne, P. E. (2005). Phylogeny determined by protein domain content, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102: 373.
120. Gough, J., Karplus, K., Hughey, R., and Chothia, C. (2001). Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure, J. Mol. Biol., 313: 903.