The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution

Nature

Volumn 420, Issue 6912, 2002, Pages 218-223

  Koonin, Eugene V ^a   Wolf, Yuri I ^a   Karev, Georgy P ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

SCALE FREE NETWORK;

PROTEINS;

GENOME; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 0037079014     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01256     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Holm, L. & Sander, C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273, 595-603 (1996).
2. Zhang, C. & DeLisi, C. Protein folds: molecular systematics in three dimensions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58, 72-79 (2001).
3. Rost, B. Did evolution leap to create the protein universe? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 409-416 (2002).
4. Dayhoff, M. O. The origin and evolution of protein superfamilies. Fed. Proc. 35, 2132-2138 (1976).
5. Dayhoff, M. O., Barker, W. C. & Hunt, L. T. Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol. 91, 524-545 (1983).
6. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536-540 (1995).
7. Murzin, A. G. Structural classification of proteins: New superfamilies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 386-394 (1996).
8. Orengo, C. A. et al. CATH - A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5, 1093-1108 (1997).
9. Todd, A. E., Orengo, C. A. & Thornton, J. M. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1113-1143 (2001).
10. Lo Conte, L., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T. J., Chothia, C. & Murzin, A. G. SCOP database in 2002: Refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 264-267 (2002).
11. Orengo, C. A. et al. The CATH protein family database: A resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes. Proteomics 2, 11-21 (2002).
12. Branden, C.-I. & Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure (Garland Publishing, New York, 1999).
13. Anantharaman, V., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. Comparative genomics and evolution of proteins involved in RNA metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1427-1464 (2002).
14. Anantharaman, V., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. Regulatory potential, phyletic distribution and evolution of ancient, intracellular small-molecule-binding domains. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1271-1292 (2001).
15. Saraste, M., Sibbald, P. R. & Wittinghofer, A. The P-loop - A common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 15, 430-434 (1990).
16. Koonin, E. V. A superfamily of ATPases with diverse functions containing either classical or deviant ATP-binding motif. J. Mol. Biol. 229, 1165-1174 (1993).
17. Aravind, L., Mazumder, R., Vasudevan, S. & Koonin, E. V. Trends in protein evolution inferred from sequence and structure analysis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 392-399 (2002).
18. Galperin, M. Y., Walker, D. R. & Koonin, E. V. Analogous enzymes: Independent inventions in enzyme evolution. Genome Res. 8, 779-790 (1998).
19. Martin, A. C. et al. Protein folds and functions. Structure 6, 875-884 (1998).
20. Fitch, W. M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19, 99-113 (1970).
21. Fitch, W. M. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet. 16, 227-231 (2000).
22. Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V. & Lipman, D. J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278, 631-637 (1997).
23. Tatusov, R. L., Galperin, M. Y., Natale, D. A. & Koonin, E. V. The COG database: A tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 33-36 (2000).
24. Jordan, I. K., Makarova, K. S., Spouge, J. L., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Lineage-specific gene expansions in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Genome Res. 11, 555-565 (2001).
25. Remm, M., Storm, C. E. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041-1052 (2001).
26. Lespinet, O., Wolf, Y. I., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. The role of lineage-specific gene family expansion in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res. 12, 1048-1059 (2002).
27. Henikoff, S. et al. Gene families: The taxonomy of protein paralogs and chimeras. Science 278, 609-614 (1997).
28. Alexandrov, N. N. & Go, N. Biological meaning, statistical significance, and classification of local spatial similarities in nonhomologous proteins. Protein Sci. 3, 866-875 (1994).
29. Orengo, C. A., Jones, D. T. & Thornton, J. M. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372, 631-634 (1994).
30. Zuckerkandl, E. The appearance of new structures and functions in proteins during evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 7, 1-57 (1975).
31. Chothia, C. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357, 543-544 (1992).
32. Zhang, C. T. Relations of the numbers of protein sequences, families and folds. Protein Eng. 10, 757-761 (1997).
33. Wang, Z. X. A re-estimation for the total numbers of protein folds and superfamilies. Protein Eng. 11, 621-626 (1998).
34. Zhang, C. & DeLisi, C. Estimating the number of protein folds. J. Mol. Biol. 284, 1301-1305 (1998).
35. Govindarajan, S., Recabarren, R. & Goldstein, R. A. Estimating the total number of protein folds. Proteins 35, 408-414 (1999).
36. Wolf, Y. I., Grishin, N. V. & Koonin, E. V. Estimating the number of protein folds and families from complete genome data. J. Mol. Biol. 299, 897-905 (2000).
37. Coulson, A. F. & Moult, J. A unifold, mesofold, and superfold model of protein fold use. Proteins 46, 61-71 (2002).
38. Kuznetsov, V. A. in Computational and Statistical Approaches to Genomics (eds Zhang, W. & Shmulevich, I.) 125-171 (Kluwer, Boston, 2002).
39. Karev, G. P., Wolf, Y. I., Rzhetsky, A. Y., Berezovskaya, F. S. & Koonin, E. V. in Computational Genomics:from Sequence to Function (eds Galperin, M. Y. & Koonin, E. V.) (Horizon, Amsterdam, in the press).
40. Karev, G. P., Wolf, Y. I., Rzhetsky, A. Y., Berezovskaya, E. S. & Koonin, E. V. Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior. BMC Evol. Biol. (in the press).
41. Huynen, M. A. & van Nimwegen, E. The frequency distribution of gene family sizes in complete genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 583-589 (1998).
42. Qian, J., Luscombe, N. M. & Gerstein, M. Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: Power-law behaviour and evolutionary model. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 673-681 (2001).
43. Harrison, P. M. & Gerstein, M. Studying genomes through the aeons: Protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 318, 1155-1174 (2002).
44. Luscombe, N., Qian, J., Zhang, Z., Johnson, T. & Gerstein, M. The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties. Genome Biol. 3, research0040.1-0040.7 (2002).
45. Barabasi, A. L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509-512 (1999).
46. Bilke, S. & Peterson, C. Topological properties of citation and metabolic networks. Phys. Rev. E64, 036106-1-036106-5(2001).
47. Barabasi, A. L. Linked: The New Science of Networks (Perseus, New York, 2002).
48. Albert, R. & Barabasi, A. L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47-97 (2002).
49. Gisiger, T. Scale invariance in biology: Coincidence or footprint of a universal mechanism? Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 76, 161-209 (2001).
50. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabasi, A. L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651-654 (2000).
51. Zipf, G. K. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1949).
52. Pareto, V. Cours d'Economie Politique (Rouge et Cie, Paris, 1897).
53. Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabasi, A. L. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297, 1551-1555 (2002).
54. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabasi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42 (2001).
55. Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273, 666-669 (1996).
56. Li, H., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. S. Are protein folds atypical? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4987-4990 (1998).
57. Rzhetsky, A. & Gomez, S. M. Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome. Bioinformatics 17, 988-996 (2001).
58. Yule, G. U. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J.C. Willis, F.R.S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213, 21-87 (1924).
59. Gould, S. J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002).
60. Doolittle, W. F. Lateral genomics. Trends Cell Biol. 9, M5-M8 (1999).
61. Doolittle, W. F. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284, 2124-2129 (1999).
62. Doolittle, W. F. You are what you eat: A gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet 14, 307-311 (1998).
63. Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S. & Aravind, L. Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 709-742 (2001).
64. Ragan, M. A. Detection of lateral gene transfer among microbial genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 620-626 (2001).
65. Marcotte, E. M. et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285, 751-753 (1999).
66. Enright, A. J., Illopoulos, I., Kyrpides, N. C. & Ouzounis, C. A. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402, 86-90 (1999).
67. Galperin, M. Y. & Koonin, E. V. Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 609-613 (2000).
68. Aravind, L. Guilt by association: Contextual information in genome analysis. Genome Res. 10, 1074-1077 (2000).
69. Koonin, E. V., Aravind, L. & Kondrashov, A. S. The impact of comparative genomics on our understanding of evolution. Cell 101, 573-576 (2000).
70. Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001).
71. Wolf, Y. I., Brenner, S. E., Bash, P. A. & Koonin, E. V. Distribution of protein folds in the three superkingdoms of life. Genome Res. 9, 17-26 (1999).
72. Wuchty, S. Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1694-1702 (2001).
73. Apic, G., Gough, J. & Teichmann, S. A. An insight into domain combinations. Bioinformatics 17(Suppl. 1),S83-S89 (2001).
74. Bork, P. et al. A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 11, 68-76 (1997).
75. Derbyshire, D. J. et al. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 21, 3863-3872 (2002).
76. Vitkup, D., Melamud, E., Moult, J. & Sander, C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 559-566 (2001).
77. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: A database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 281-283 (2002).