An evolutionarily structural universe of protein architecture

Genome Research

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1563-1571

  Caetano Anollés, Gustavo ^a,b   Caetano Anollés, Derek ^a  

^a Vital NRG   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; INSECT PROTEIN; ENZYME; PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ALPHA HELIX; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; BETA SHEET; CLADISTICS; EUKARYOTE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICS;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; INSECTA;

ANIMALS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENZYMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME;

EID: 0038486929     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.1161903     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Ancel, L.W. and Fontana, W. 2000. Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. J. Exp. Zool. Part B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 288: 242-283.
2. Apic, G., Gough, J., and Teichmann, S.A. 2001. An insight into domain combinations. Bioinformatics 17: S83-S89.
3. Aravind, L., Mazumder, R., Vasudevan, S., and Koonin, E.V. 2002a. Trends in protein evolution inferred from sequence and structure analysis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 392-399.
4. Aravind, L., Anantharaman, V., and Koonin, E.V. 2002b. Monophily of class I aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, USPA, ETFP, photolyase, and PP-ATPase nucleotide-binding domains: Implications for protein evolution in the RNA world. Proteins 48: 1-14.
5. Bailey, J.A., Gu, Z., Clark, R.A., Reinert, K., Samonte, R.V., Schwartz, S., Adams, M.D., Myers, E.W., Li, P.W., and Eichler, E.E. 2002. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 297: 1003-1007.
6. Caetano-Anollés, G. 2002a. Evolved RNA structure and the rooting of the universal tree of life. J. Mol. Evol. 54: 333-345.
7. Caetano-Anollés, G. 2002b. Tracing the evolution of RNA structure in ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 2575-2587.
8. Carlile, M. 1982. Prokaryotes and eukaryotes: Strategies and successes. Trends. Biochem. 7: 128-130.
9. Chothia, C., Hubard, T., Brenner, S., Barns, H., and Murzin, A. 1997. Protein folds in the all-β and all-α classes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26: 597-627.
10. Doolittle, R.F. 1995. The multiplicity of domains in proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64: 287-314.
11. Doolittle, W.F. 1999. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284: 2124-2128.
12. Doolittle, W.F. 2000. The nature of the universal ancestor and the evolution of the proteome. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 355-358.
13. Eisen, J.A. 2000. Horizontal gene transfer among microbial genomes: New insights from complete genome analysis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10: 606-611.
14. Farris, J.S., Kållersjö, M., Kluge, A.G., and Bult, C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. Fitch, W.M. and Upper, K. 1987. The phylogeny of tRNA sequences provides evidence for ambiguity reduction in the origin of the genetic code. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52: 759-767.
17. Forterre, P. and Philippe, H. 1999. Where is the root of the universal tree of life? BioEssays 21: 871-879.
18. Frishman, D., Albermann, K., Hani, J., Heumann, K., Metanomski, A., Zollner, A., and Mewes, H.-W. 2001. Functional and structural genomics using PEDANT. Bioinformatics 17: 44-57.
19. Gerstein, M. 1998. Patterns of protein-fold usage in eight microbial genomes: A comprehensive structural census. Proteins 33: 518-534.
20. Gerstein, M. and Hegyi, H. 1998. Comparing genomes in terms of protein structure: Surveys of a finite parts list. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22: 277-304.
21. Grishin, N.V. 2001. Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 167-185.
22. Hartwell, L.H., Hopfield, J.J., Leibler, S., and Murray, A.W. 1999. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402: C47-C52.
23. Hegyi, H., Lin, J., Greenbaum, D., and Gerstein, M. 2002. Structural genomics analysis: Characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds. Proteins 47: 126-141.
24. Jain, R., Rivera, M.C., and Lake, J.A. 1999. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: The complexity hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 3801-3806.
25. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Ottvai, Z.N., and Barabási, A.-L. 2000. The large scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407: 651-654.
26. Kitching, I.J. 1992. The determination of character polarity. In Cladistics, (eds. P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries, I.J. Kitching, R.W. Scotland, D.J. Siebert, and D.M. Williams), pp. 22-43. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
27. Koonin, E.V., Aravind, L., and Kondrashov, A.S. 2000. The impact of comparative genomics on our understanding of evolution. Cell 101: 573-576.
28. Lo Conte, L., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T.J.P., Chothia, C., and Murzin, A. 2002. SCOP database in 2002: Refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 264-267.
29. Lupas, A.N., Ponting, C.P., and Russell, R.B. 2001. On the evolution of protein folds: Are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? J. Struct. Biology 134: 191-203.
30. Lynch, M. and Conery, J.S. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 10: 1151-1155.
31. Maddison, W.P. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Zool. 40: 304-314.
32. Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. 1999. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.08. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
33. McLachlan, A.D. 1979. Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotripsin. J. Mol. Biol. 12: 49-79.
34. Moundsey, A., Bauer, P., and Hope, I.A. 2002. Evidence suggesting that a fifth of annotated Caenorhabditis elegans genes may be pseudogenes. Genome Res. 12: 770-775.
35. Murzin, A. 1998. How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 380-387.
36. Murzin, A., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Clothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
37. Nee, S., Holmes, E.C., May, R.M., and Harvey, P.H. 1994. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 344: 77-82.
38. Nowak, M.A., Boerlijst, M.C., Cooke, J., and Smith, J.M. 1997. Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature 388: 167-171.
39. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
40. Page, R.D.M. 1993. COMPONENT, tree comparison software for Microsoft Windows, v. 2.0. The Natural History Museum, London.
41. Penny, D. and Poole, A. 1999. The nature of the universal common ancestor. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 672-677.
42. Ponting, C.P. and Russell, R.R. 2002. The natural history of protein domains. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31: 45-71.
43. Quian, J., Luscombe, N.M., and Gerstein, M. 2001. Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: Power-law behavior and evolutionary model. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 673-681.
44. Riley, M. and Labedan, B. 1997. Protein evolution viewed through Escherichia coli protein sequences: Introducing the notion of a structural segment of homology, the module. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 857-868.
45. Snel, B., Bork, P., and Huynen, M.A. 1999. Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nat. Genet. 21: 108-110.
46. Swindells, M.B., Orengo, C.A. Jones, D.T., Hutchinson, E.G., and Thornton, J.M. 1998. Contemporary approaches to protein structure classification. BioEssays 20: 884-891.
47. Swofford, D.L. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other programs (PAUP*), version 4. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
48. Taylor, W.R. 2002. A 'periodic table' for protein structures. Nature 416: 657-660.
49. Teichmann, S.A., Chothia, C., and Gerstein, M. 1999. Advances in structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 390-399.
50. Thiele, K. 1993. The holy grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275-304.
51. Thorley, J.L. and Page, R.D.M. 2000. RadCon: Phylogenetic tree comparison and consensus. Bioinformatics 16: 486-487.
52. White, S.H. 1994. Global statistics of protein sequences: Implications for the origin, evolution, and prediction of structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23: 407-439.
53. Wilkinson, M., Thorley, J.L., and Upchurch, P. 2000. A chain is no longer than its weakest link: Double decay analysis of phylogenetic hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 49: 754-776.
54. Wixon, J. and Kell, D. 2000. The Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes - KEGG. Yeast 17: 48-55.
55. Woese, C. 1998. The universal ancestor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 6854-6859.
56. Woese, C.R., Kandler, O., and Wheelis, M.L. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 4576-4579.
57. Wolf, Y.I., Brenner, S.E., Bash, P.A., and Koonin, E.V. 1999. Distribution of protein folds in the three superkingdoms of life. Genome Res. 9: 17-26.
58. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Grishin, N.V., and Koonin, E.V. 2002. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet. 18: 472-479.