A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among online self-, peer-, external- and instructor-assessments: The competitive effect

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 60, Issue , 2016, Pages 112-120

  Domínguez, César ^a   Jaime, Arturo ^a   Sánchez, Ana ^b   Blanco, José Miguel ^b   Heras, Jónathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LA RIOJA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Competitive effect; External assessment; Online tools; Peer assessment; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

COMPETITIVE EFFECTS; EXTERNAL-ASSESSMENT; ON-LINE TOOLS; PEER ASSESSMENT; SELF ASSESSMENT;

EDUCATION;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 84959158697     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.061     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. M. Azarnoosh Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias Language Testing in Asia 3 11 2013
2. M. Boubouka, and K.A. Papanikolaou Alternative assessment methods in technology enhanced project-based learning International Journal of Learning Technology 8 3 2013 263 296
3. C.-C. Chang, K.-H. Tseng, and S.-J. Lou A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students Computers & Education 58 2012 303 320
4. Ch Chen The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system Computers & Education 55 2010 229 236
5. N.-S. Chen, C.-W. Wei, K.-T. Wua, and L. Uden Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners' reflection levels Computers & Education 52 2009 283 291
6. K. Cho, C.D. Schunn, and R.W. Wilson Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives Journal of Educational Psychology 98 2006 891 901
7. C. Domínguez, and A. Jaime Database design learning: a project-based approach organized through a course management system Computers & Education 55 3 2010
8. P.D. Ellis The essential guide to effect sizes statistical power, meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of research results textbook 2010 Cambridge University Press
9. N. Falchikov Involving students in assessment Psychology Learning and Teaching 3 2 2003 102 108
10. N. Falchikov, and J. Goldfinch Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks Review of Educational Research 70 3 2000 287 322
11. S. Gielen, F. Dochy, and P. Onghena An inventory of peer assessment diversity Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 36 2011 137 155
12. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson Multivariate data analysis 7th ed. 2009 Pearson
13. J. Hamer, H. Purchase, A. Luxton-Reilly, and P. Denny A comparison of peer and tutor feedback Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 1 2015 151 164
14. T. Hovardas, O.E. Tsivitanidou, and Z.C. Zacharia Peer versus expert feedback: an investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students Computers & Education 71 2014 133 152
15. A. Jaime, C. Domínguez, A. Sánchez, and J.M. Blanco Interuniversity telecollaboration to improve academic results and identify preferred communication tools Computers & Education 64 2013 63 69
16. G.J. Kennedy Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it? Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education 42 2005 59 65
17. R.F. Kizilcec, C. Piech, and E. Schneider Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2013 ACM 170 179
18. J. Kruger, and D. Dunning Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 6 1999 1121 1134
19. C. Kulkarni, P.W. Koh, H. Le, D. Chia, K. Papadopoulos, J. Cheng, and et al. Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 9 4 2013 39
20. C.-L. Lai, and G.-J. Hwang An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices Computers & Education 85 2015 149 159
21. L. Legault, and C. Amiot The role of autonomy in intergroup processes: integrating self-determination theory and intergroup approaches N. Weinstein, Integrating human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research and applications 2014 Springer 159 190
22. L. Li, X. Liu, and A.L. Steckelberg Assessor or assessee: how student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback British Journal of Educational Technology 41 3 2010 525 536
23. S.S.J. Lin, E.Z. Liu, and S.M. Yuan Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 2001 420 432
24. H. Li, Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M.L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K.S. Chung, and et al. Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2015 10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
25. A.P. Llado, L.F. Soley, R.M.F. Sansbello, G.A. Pujolras, J.P. Planella, N. Roura-Pascual, and et al. Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 5 2014 592 610
26. H. Luo, A.C. Robinson, and J.Y. Park Peer grading in a MOOC: reliability, validity, and perceived effects Online Learning Journal 18 2 2014 1 14
27. O. McGarr, and A.M. Clifford 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment Higher Education 65 2013 677 693
28. E. Panadero, M. Romero, and J. Strijbos The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 4 2013 195 203
29. J. Pereira, L. Echeazarra, S. Sanz-Santamaría, and J. Gutiérrez Student-generated online videos to develop cross-curricular and curricular competencies in nursing studies Computers in Human Behavior 31 2014 580 590
30. E. Pronin Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 1 2006 37 43
31. P.M. Sadler, and E. Good The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning Educational Assessment 11 1 2006 1 31
32. T. Schlösser, D. Dunning, K.L. Johnson, and J. Kruger How unaware are the unskilled? empirical tests of the "signal extraction" counterexplanation for the Dunning-Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance Journal of Economic Psychology 39 2013 85 100
33. R.T. Snodgrass Editorial: single-versus double-blind reviewing ACM Transactions on Database Systems 32 1 2007 1
34. H. Søndergaard, and R.A. Mulder Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programs and potential Computer Science Education 22 4 2012 343 367
35. J.W. Strijbos, and D. Sluijsmans Unravelling peer assessment: methodological, functional, and conceptual developments Learning and Instruction 20 2010 265 269
36. Y.-T. Sung, K.-E. Chang, S.-K. Chiou, and H.-T. Hou The design and application of a web-based self and peer-assessment system Computers & Education 45 2005 187 202
37. K.J. Topping Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities Review of Educational Research 68 3 1998 249 276
38. K.J. Topping Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards vol. 1 2003 Springer 55 87
39. K.J. Topping Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment Learning and Instruction 20 4 2010 339 343
40. S.C. Tseng, and C.C. Tsai On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: a study of high school computer course Computers & Education 49 4 2007 1161 1174
41. P. Tynjälä, M. Pirhonen, T. Vartiainen, and L. Helle Educating IT project managers through project-based learning: a working-life perspective Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24 1 2009 16
42. P. Willmot, K. Pond, S.P. Loddington, and O.A. Palermo Perceptions of peer assessment in university teamwork International conference on engineering education 2008 27 31