-
1
-
-
0031500771
-
Poster presentations and peer assessment: Novel forms of evaluation and assessment
-
Billington, H. L. (1997). Poster presentations and peer assessment: novel forms of evaluation and assessment. Journal of Biological Education, 31(3), 218-220.
-
(1997)
Journal of Biological Education
, vol.31
, Issue.3
, pp. 218-220
-
-
Billington, H.L.1
-
3
-
-
33645383868
-
-
Keele, Staffordshire: Centre for Learning Technology, Keele University. Retrieved from
-
Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Keele, Staffordshire: Centre for Learning Technology, Keele University. Retrieved from http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/engageinassessment/Student_peer_assessment_-_Stephen_Bostock.pdf
-
(2000)
Student peer assessment
-
-
Bostock, S.1
-
4
-
-
77954255380
-
Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted?
-
Bouzidi, L., & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted? Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 257-268.
-
(2009)
Educational Technology & Society
, vol.12
, Issue.4
, pp. 257-268
-
-
Bouzidi, L.1
Jaillet, A.2
-
5
-
-
84888104750
-
-
in P. Knight (Ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page/SEDA
-
Brown, S., Race, P., & Rust, C. (1995). Using and experiencing assessment, in P. Knight (Ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp.75-85). London: Kogan Page/SEDA.
-
(1995)
Using and experiencing assessment
, pp. 75-85
-
-
Brown, S.1
Race, P.2
Rust, C.3
-
7
-
-
0040192590
-
Analysis of peer-, self-and staff-assessment in group project work
-
Butcher, A. C., Stefani, L. A. J., & Tariq, V. N. (1995). Analysis of peer-, self-and staff-assessment in group project work. Assessment in Education, 2(2), 165-185.
-
(1995)
Assessment in Education
, vol.2
, Issue.2
, pp. 165-185
-
-
Butcher, A.C.1
Stefani, L.A.J.2
Tariq, V.N.3
-
8
-
-
0000314899
-
Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project
-
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 301-314.
-
(1999)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.24
, pp. 301-314
-
-
Cheng, W.1
Warren, M.2
-
9
-
-
33751015138
-
Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives
-
Cho, K., Schunn, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901.
-
(2006)
Journal of Educational Psychology
, vol.98
, Issue.4
, pp. 891-901
-
-
Cho, K.1
Schunn, C.2
Wilson, R.3
-
10
-
-
84905083530
-
-
Coursera. (n.d.). Retrieved from
-
Coursera. (n.d.). Pedagogical Foundations. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about/pedagogy
-
Pedagogical Foundations.
-
-
-
11
-
-
84905084287
-
-
Coursera. (March 12) Retrieved from
-
Coursera. (2014, March 12) How will my grade be determined? Retrieved from. http://help.coursera.org/customer/portal/articles/1163304-how-will-my-grade-be-determined
-
(2014)
How will my grade be determined?
-
-
-
13
-
-
0040935279
-
Learning from peer feedback marking: Student and teacher perspectives
-
In H. C. Foot, C. J. Howe, A. Anderson, A. K. Tolmie, & D. A. Warden (Eds.), Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications
-
Falchikov, N. (1994). Learning from peer feedback marking: student and teacher perspectives. In H. C. Foot, C. J. Howe, A. Anderson, A. K. Tolmie, & D. A. Warden (Eds.), Group and interactive learning (pp. 411-416). Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications.
-
(1994)
Group and interactive learning
, pp. 411-416
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
-
14
-
-
0034562333
-
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
-
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
-
(2000)
Review of Educational Research
, vol.70
, Issue.3
, pp. 287-322
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
Goldfinch, J.2
-
16
-
-
0001523593
-
Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education
-
Fry, S. A. (1990). Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), 177-189.
-
(1990)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.15
, Issue.3
, pp. 177-189
-
-
Fry, S.A.1
-
18
-
-
21144480333
-
Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology courses
-
Haaga, D. A. F. (1993). Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 20(1), 28-32.
-
(1993)
Teaching of Psychology
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 28-32
-
-
Haaga, D.A.F.1
-
20
-
-
0040787043
-
The coincidence of student evaluation by professor and peer group using rank correlation
-
Kaimann, R. A. (1974). The coincidence of student evaluation by professor and peer group using rank correlation. The Journal of Educational Research, 68(4), 152-153.
-
(1974)
The Journal of Educational Research
, vol.68
, Issue.4
, pp. 152-153
-
-
Kaimann, R.A.1
-
21
-
-
0015104773
-
Medical school evaluation and internship performance
-
Korman, M., & Stubblefield, R. L. (1971). Medical school evaluation and internship performance. Journal of Medical Education, 46, 670-673.
-
(1971)
Journal of Medical Education
, vol.46
, pp. 670-673
-
-
Korman, M.1
Stubblefield, R.L.2
-
22
-
-
34547609637
-
A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback
-
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100-115.
-
(2007)
Journal of Interactive Online Learning
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 100-115
-
-
Lu, R.1
Bol, L.2
-
23
-
-
84857059914
-
Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback
-
Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275.
-
(2012)
Instructional Science
, vol.40
, Issue.2
, pp. 257-275
-
-
Lu, J.1
Law, N.2
-
24
-
-
0010849663
-
Should student peer ratings be used as part of summative assessment?
-
Magin, D. (1993). Should student peer ratings be used as part of summative assessment? Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 537-542.
-
(1993)
Higher Education Research and Development
, vol.16
, pp. 537-542
-
-
Magin, D.1
-
25
-
-
0347868495
-
Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work
-
Magin, D. (2001). Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 53-63.
-
(2001)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.26
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-63
-
-
Magin, D.1
-
28
-
-
84877599614
-
'Just enough to make you take it seriously': Exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment
-
McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher education, 65(6), 677-693.
-
(2013)
Higher education
, vol.65
, Issue.6
, pp. 677-693
-
-
McGarr, O.1
Clifford, A.M.2
-
29
-
-
10044242449
-
The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment
-
Miller, P. J. (2003). The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 383-394.
-
(2003)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.28
, Issue.4
, pp. 383-394
-
-
Miller, P.J.1
-
30
-
-
79959558722
-
A case study of students' perceptions of peer assessment in Hong Kong
-
Mok, J. (2011). A case study of students' perceptions of peer assessment in Hong Kong. ELT journal, 65(3), 230-239.
-
(2011)
ELT journal
, vol.65
, Issue.3
, pp. 230-239
-
-
Mok, J.1
-
32
-
-
21844506355
-
Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing-A case study from geography
-
Mowl, G., & Pain, R. (1995). Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing-A case study from geography. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 324-335.
-
(1995)
Innovations in Education and Training International
, vol.32
, pp. 324-335
-
-
Mowl, G.1
Pain, R.2
-
34
-
-
0000860854
-
Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level-an experimental report
-
Oldfield, K. A., & Macalpine, M. K. (1995). Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level-an experimental report. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), 125-131.
-
(1995)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 125-131
-
-
Oldfield, K.A.1
McAlpine, M.K.2
-
35
-
-
0010849882
-
Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: A research note
-
Orpen, C. (1982). Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: a research note. Higher Education, 11, 567-572.
-
(1982)
Higher Education
, vol.11
, pp. 567-572
-
-
Orpen, C.1
-
36
-
-
84872714884
-
The Year of the MOOC
-
(November 2). Retrieved from
-
Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-oline-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
-
(2012)
The New York Times.
-
-
Pappano, L.1
-
37
-
-
84901431680
-
-
Retrieved from
-
Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., & Koller, D. (2013). Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~jhuang11/research/pubs/edm13/edm13.pdf
-
(2013)
Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs
-
-
Piech, C.1
Huang, J.2
Chen, Z.3
Do, C.4
Ng, A.5
Koller, D.6
-
38
-
-
33749365074
-
Practical pointers on peer-assessment
-
In S. Brown (Ed.), Birmingham: SEDA
-
Race, P. (1998). Practical pointers on peer-assessment. In S. Brown (Ed.) Peer Assessment in Practice (SEDA Paper 102) (pp.113-122). Birmingham: SEDA.
-
(1998)
Peer Assessment in Practice (SEDA Paper 102)
, pp. 113-122
-
-
Race, P.1
-
39
-
-
84905126225
-
-
(March 5). Retrieved from
-
Rees, J. (2013, March 5). Peer Grading Can't Work. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/03/05/essays-flaws-peer-grading-moocs#ixzz2MiKxNP7b
-
(2013)
Peer Grading Can't Work.
-
-
Rees, J.1
-
40
-
-
33645065584
-
The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning
-
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11 (1), 1-31.
-
(2006)
Educational Assessment
, vol.11
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-31
-
-
Sadler, P.1
Good, E.2
-
41
-
-
48249153186
-
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability
-
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
-
(1979)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.86
, Issue.2
, pp. 420-428
-
-
Shrout, P.E.1
Fleiss, J.L.2
-
42
-
-
84938066550
-
Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities
-
Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
-
(1994)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.19
, Issue.1
, pp. 69-75
-
-
Stefani, L.A.J.1
-
43
-
-
77949873085
-
Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?
-
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and instruction, 20(4), 291-303.
-
(2010)
Learning and instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 291-303
-
-
Strijbos, J.W.1
Narciss, S.2
Dünnebier, K.3
-
44
-
-
77949874605
-
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
-
Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265-269.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 265-269
-
-
Strijbos, J.W.1
Sluijsmans, D.2
-
45
-
-
61449184495
-
Peer assessment
-
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27.
-
(2009)
Theory into Practice
, vol.48
, Issue.1
, pp. 20-27
-
-
Topping, K.J.1
-
46
-
-
0042734232
-
Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students
-
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
-
(2000)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.25
, Issue.2
, pp. 149-169
-
-
Topping, K.J.1
Smith, E.F.2
Swanson, I.3
Elliot, A.4
-
47
-
-
0032285568
-
Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities
-
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
-
(1998)
Review of Educational Research
, vol.68
, Issue.3
, pp. 249-276
-
-
Topping, K.1
-
48
-
-
78349263299
-
Students' experience of peer assessment in a professional course
-
Vu, T. T., & Dall'Alba, G. (2007). Students' experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 541-556.
-
(2007)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.32
, Issue.5
, pp. 541-556
-
-
Vu, T.T.1
Dall'Alba, G.2
-
49
-
-
84928015736
-
-
(August 27). Retrieved from
-
Watters, A. (2012, August 27). The Problems with Peer Grading in Coursera. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/hack-higher-education/problems-peer-grading-coursera
-
(2012)
The Problems with Peer Grading in Coursera.
-
-
Watters, A.1
-
50
-
-
32944457340
-
Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers
-
Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83-92.
-
(2006)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
, vol.43
, Issue.1
, pp. 83-92
-
-
Wen, M.L.1
Tsai, C.C.2
Chang, C.Y.3
-
51
-
-
74949125671
-
Assessing the reliability of self-and peer rating in student group work
-
Zhang, B., Johnston, L., & Kilic, G. B. (2008). Assessing the reliability of self-and peer rating in student group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 329-340.
-
(2008)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.33
, Issue.3
, pp. 329-340
-
-
Zhang, B.1
Johnston, L.2
Kilic, G.B.3
|