Hybrid lesson study: extending lesson study on-line

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 152-169

  D Nickerson, Susan ^a   Fredenberg, Michael ^b   Kinsella Druken, Bridget ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid learning environment; Lesson study; Mathematics instruction; Professional development; Professional learning communities; USA

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958984075     PISSN: 20468253     EISSN: 20468261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/IJLLS-06-2013-0037     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ball, D.L. and Cohen, D.K. (1999), “Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education”, in Sykes, G. and Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds), Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 3-32.
2. Ball, D.L. and Forzani, F.M. (2009), “The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 497-511.
3. Barab, S.A., Kling, R. and Gray, J.H. (2004), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J.G. and Scheckler, R. (2003), “Designing system dualities: characterizing an online professional development community”, The Information Society, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 237-256.
5. Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J.G., Moore, J.A., Cunningham, D.J. and the ILF Design Team (2001), “Designing and building an on-line community: the struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 71-96.
6. Chokshi, S. and Fernandez, C. (2004), “Challenges to importing lesson study: concerns, misconceptions and nuances”, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 85 No. 7, pp. 520-525.
7. Clay, E., Silverman, J. and Fischer, D.J. (2012), “Unpacking online asynchronous collaboration in mathematics teacher education”, ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 761-773.
8. Cobb, P. and Jackson, K. (2011), “Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale”, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 6-33.
9. Cook, S.D.N. and Brown, J.S. (1999), “Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 381-400.
10. Derry, S., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., Lee, J. and Siegel, M.A. (2004), “From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: an evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education”, in Barab, S.A., Kling, R. and Gray, J.H. (Eds), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 256-295.
11. Dudley, P. (2012), “Lesson study development in England: from school networks to national policy”, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 85-100.
12. Fernandez, C. and Yoshida, M. (2004), Lesson Study: A Japanese Approach to Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Fishman, B., Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. and Soloway, E. (2004), “Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 43-76.
14. Gee, J.P., Michaels, S. and O'Connor, M.C. (1992), “Discours e analysis”, in Lecompte, M.D., Milroy, W.L. and Preissle, J. (Eds), The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, Academic Press, London, pp. 227-291.
15. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K. and McDonald, M. (2009), “Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education”, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 273-289.
16. Hart, L.C., Alston, A.S. and Murata, A. (2011), Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education: Learning Together, Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht.
17. Herring, S.C. (2004), “Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching on-line behavior”, in Barab, S.A., Kling, R. and Gray, J.H. (Eds), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 338-376.
18. Horn, I.S. (2010), “Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community”, The Teachers College Record, Vol. 112 No. 1, pp. 225-259.
19. Horn, I.S. and Little, J.W. (2010), “Attending to problems of practice: routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 181-217.
20. Huang, R. and Bao, J. (2006), “Towards a model for teacher's professional development in China: introducing Keli”, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 279-298.
21. Hunter, J. and Back, J. (2011), “Facilitating sustainable professional development through lesson study”, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 94-114.
22. Kazemi, E., Franke, M. and Lampert, M. (2009), “Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious teaching”, Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia was held at Massey University, Wellington, 5-9 July.
23. Lewis, C. (2002), Lesson Study: A Handbook of Teacher-led Instructional Change, Research for Better Schools, Philadelphia, PA.
24. Lewis, C. (2006), “Lesson study in North America: progress and challenges”, in Matoba, M., Crawford, K.A. and SarkarArani, M.R. (Eds), Lesson Study: International Perspective on Policy and Practice, Educational Science Publishing House, Beijing, pp. 1-15.
25. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Murata, A. (2006a), “How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 3-14.
26. Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J. and O'Connell, M.P. (2006b), “Lesson study comes of age in North America”, Phi Delta Kappa, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 273-281.
27. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Hurd, J. (2009a), “Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case”, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 285-304.
28. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Friedkin, S. (2009b), “Lesson study as action research”, in Nofke, S.E. and Somekh, B. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research, Sage Publications, London, pp. 142-154.
29. Li, Y. and Li, J. (2009), “Mathematics classroom instruction excellence through the platform of teaching contests”, ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 263-277.
30. Li, Y. and Qi, C. (2011), “Online study collaboration to improve teachers’ expertise in instructional design in mathematics”, ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 43, pp. 833-845.
31. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J. and Chrostowski, S.J. (2004), “TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report”, Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
32. Murata, A. (2011), “Introduction: conceptual overview of lesson study”, in Hart, L.C., Alston, A.S., and Murata, A. (Eds), Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education, Springer, Dordrecht, PLACE, pp. 1-12.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012), Education at a Glance, OECD Publishing, Paris, available at: www.oecd.org/edu/eag2012.htm
34. Penuel, W.R., Sun, M., Frank, K.A. and Gallagher, H.A. (2012), “Using social network analysis to study how collegial interactions can augment teacher learning from external professional development”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 119 No. 1, pp. 103-136.
35. Perry, R.R. and Lewis, C.C. (2009), “What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?”, Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 365-391.
36. Saito, E., Khong, T.D.H. and Tsukui, A. (2012), “Why is school reform sustained even after a project? A case study of Bac Giang Province, Vietnam”, Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 259-287.
37. Sibbald, T. (2009), “The relationship between lesson study and self-efficacy”, School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 109 No. 8, pp. 450-460.
38. Sleep, L. (2012), “The work of steering instruction toward the mathematical point: a decomposition of teaching practice”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 935-970.
39. Stigler, J. and Hiebert, J. (1999), The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom, The Free Press, New York, NY.
40. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994), “Grounded theory methodology: an overview”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 273-285.
41. Watanabe, T., Takahashi, A. and Yoshida, M. (2008), “Kyozaikenku: a critical step for conducting effective lessons study and beyond”, in Arbaugh, F. and Taylor, P.M. (Eds), AMTE Monograph 5: Inquiry into Mathematics Teacher Education, Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, San Diego, CA, pp. 131-142.
42. Yoshida, M. (2008), “Exploring ideas for mathematics teacher educator's contribution to lesson study”, in Tirosh, D. and Wood, T. (Eds), Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 2 of International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 85-106.
43. Yoshida, M. (2012), “Mathematics lesson study in the United States”, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 140-152.
44. Zawojewski, J., Chamberlin, M., Hjalmarson, M.A. and Lewis, C. (2008), “Developing design studies in mathematics education professional development: studying teacher's interpretive systems”, in Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A. and Baek, J.Y. (Eds), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning and Teaching, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 219-239.