What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?

Journal of Educational Change

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 365-391

  Perry, Rebecca R ^a   Lewis, Catherine C ^a  

^a MILLS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational reform; Organizational change; Professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 76149141871     PISSN: 13892843     EISSN: 15731812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-008-9069-7     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Ball, D. L. (2002). What do we believe about teacher learning and how can we learn with and from our beliefs? In D. S. Mewborn, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Mathematics, Science, and Environmental Education, 3-19.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, R. B. (2006). Learning mathematics for teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.
4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.
5. Bauld, L., & Hurd, J. (2004). A mathematically powerful classroom...a product of lesson study. Presentation at the California Mathematics Council, Asilomar, CA.
6. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII, factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
7. Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform (foundations monograph, vol. 3). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
8. Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington state. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 171-201.
9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
11. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
12. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345.
13. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L (1990). Relations between policy and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249-256.
14. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Cooper, R., Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. (1998). Success for all: Improving the quality of implementation of whole-school change through the use of a national reform network. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 385-408.
16. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
17. Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453-477.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202-218). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 167-191.
20. Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. London: Routledge Falmer.
21. Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1988). Steady work: Policy, practice and the reform of American education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
22. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A U. S.-Japan lesson study collaborative reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171-185.
24. Fernandez, C., Chokshi, S., Cannon, J., & Yoshida, M. (2001). Learning about lesson study in the United States. In E. Beauchamp (Ed.), New and old voices on Japanese education. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
25. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 14(1), 67-80.
26. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689.
27. Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
28. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
29. Germain-McCarthy, Y. (2001). Bringing the NCTM standards to life: Exemplary practices for middle schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
31. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
32. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
33. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
35. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
36. Hurd, J., & Licciardo-Musso, L. (2005). Lesson Study: Teacher led professional development in literacy instruction. Language Arts, 82(5), 388-395.
37. Knapp, M. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 227-266.
38. Kruse, S., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1994). Building professional community in schools. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 6, 3-6.
39. Learned, M., & Keadle, M. (2004). Got lesson study? Presentation at the California Mathematics Council, Asilomar, CA.
40. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Lewis, C. (2002a). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development1(1), 1-23.
42. Lewis, C. (2002b). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
43. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science. Journal of Education Policy, 12(5), 313-331.
44. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 14-17, 50-52.
45. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Friedkin, S. (2007). Coherent mathematics curriculum: Bridging the worlds of policy and practice. Unpublished manuscript, Mills College.
46. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18-22.
47. Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O'Connell, M. P. (2006). Lesson study comes of age in North America. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 273-281.
48. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2004). What counts as evidence of learning from practice? Collaborative critique of lesson study research methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
49. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
50. Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2002). Inside the national writing project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Linn, M., & His, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
53. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
54. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers' professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175-204). New York: College Board.
55. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
56. McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper and going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301-323.
57. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford University: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
58. Mills College Lesson Study Group. (2005). How many seats? (DVD) Oakland, CA: Mills College.
59. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. Murata, A. (2003). Teacher learning and lesson study: Developing efficacy through experiencing student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Columbus, OH.
61. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2001). Navigations-steering through principles and standards. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
62. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63. National Research Council. (2002). Studying classroom teaching as a medium for professional development. Proceedings of a U. S.-Japan Workshop. In H. Bass, Z. P. Usiskin, & G. Burrill (Eds.), Mathematical sciences education board division of behavioral and social sciences and education U. S. national commission on mathematics instruction international organizations board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
64. Newman, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
65. Perry, R. R. (1996). The role of teachers' professional communities in the implementation of California mathematics reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
66. Perry, R., & Lewis, C. (2006). A perfect storm: Using lesson study to build and share professional knowledge. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the MacArthur Meta-Study, Mills College.
67. Perry, R., Lewis, C., & Akiba, M. (2002). Lesson study in the Bay Area School District. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
68. Perry, R., Lewis, C., & Murata, A. (2003). Lesson study and teachers' knowledge development: Collaborative critique of a research model and methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
69. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
70. Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.
71. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US mathematics and science education. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
73. Schön, D. A. (1987). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
74. Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York: Longman.
75. Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
76. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1990). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing; 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association (pp. 233-267). London: Taylor & Francis.
77. Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
78. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. [Electronic version]. Retrieved December 17, 2004 from the Northwestern University Distributed Leadership web site: http://dls. sesp. northwestern. edu/index. php?show=papers.
79. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit Books.
80. Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 465-467.
81. Sykes, G. (1999). Introduction: Teaching as the learning profession. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. xv-xxiii). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
82. Takahashi, A. (2003). Lesson study overview: Three major types of lesson study. Presentation prepared for Global Education Resources Lesson Study Immersion Program in Japan.
83. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. London: Cambridge University Press.
84. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
85. Wang-Iverson, P., Liptak, L., & Jackson, W. (2000). Journey beyond TIMSS: Rethinking professional development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Education, Hangzhou, China.
86. Weeks, D. J. (2001). Creating happy memories through lesson study. Northwest Teacher, 2(2), 6-11.
87. Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: A case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.