The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test

Cognition

Volumn 150, Issue , 2016, Pages 109-118

  Travers, Eoin ^a   Rolison, Jonathan J ^a   Feeney, Aidan ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive Reflection Test; Conflict; Dual processes; Heuristic; Mouse tracking; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITION ASSESSMENT; COGNITIVE REFLECTION TEST; DIAGNOSTIC REASONING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; FEMALE; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; THINKING; TIME FACTOR;

COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; THINKING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84958214465     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(4):390-412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
2. Böckenholt U. The cognitive-miser response model: Testing for intuitive and deliberate reasoning. Psychometrika 2012, 77(2):388-399. 10.1007/s11336-012-9251-y.
3. Campitelli G., Gerrans P. Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition 2014, 42(3):434-447. 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9.
4. Campitelli G., Labollita M. Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5(3):182-191.
5. Cokely E.T., Kelley C.M. Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making 2009, 4(1):20-33.
6. De Neys W. Beyond response output: More logical than we think. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009, 32(01):87-88. 10.1017/S0140525X09000326.
7. De Neys W. Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(1):28-38. 10.1177/1745691611429354.
8. De Neys W. Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking & Reasoning 2014, 20(2):169-187. 10.1080/13546783.2013.854725.
9. De Neys W., Cromheeke S., Osman M. Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(1):e15954. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015954.
10. De Neys W., Glumicic T. Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition 2008, 106(3):1248-1299. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002.
11. De Neys W., Moyens E., Vansteenwegen D. Feeling we're biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2010, 10(2):208-216. 10.3758/CABN.10.2.208.
12. De Neys W., Rossi S., Houdé O. Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2013, 20(2):269-273. 10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5.
13. De Neys W., Vartanian O., Goel V. Smarter than we think When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science 2008, 19(5):483-489. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x.
14. Evans J.S.B.T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(3):378-395. 10.3758/BF03193858.
15. Evans J.S.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59(1):255-278. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
16. Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K.E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013, 8(3):223-241. 10.1177/1745691612460685.
17. Fernbach P.M., Rogers T., Fox C.R., Sloman S.A. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science 2013, 24(6):939-946. 10.1177/0956797612464058.
18. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005, 19(4):25-42. 10.1257/089533005775196732.
19. Freeman J.B., Dale R., Farmer T.A. Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059.
20. Gangemi A., Bourgeois-Gironde S., Mancini F. Feelings of error in reasoning-In search of a phenomenon. Thinking & Reasoning 2015, 21(4):383-396. 10.1080/13546783.2014.980755.
21. Huang J., White R.W., Dumais S. No clicks, no problem: Using cursor movements to understand and improve search. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2011, 1225-1234. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 10.1145/1978942.1979125.
22. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow 2011, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, US.
23. Kahneman D., Frederick S. A model of heuristic judgment. The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning 2005, 267-293. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison (Eds.).
24. Klauer K.C., Singmann H. Does logic feel good? Testing for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2013, 39(4):1265-1273. 10.1037/a0030530.
25. Koehler D.J., James G. Probability matching and strategy availability. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38(6):667-676. 10.3758/MC.38.6.667.
26. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (Version 2.0-29). Retrieved from. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html.
27. Liberali J.M., Reyna V.F., Furlan S., Stein L.M., Pardo S.T. Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2012, 25(4):361-381. 10.1002/bdm.752.
28. Mata A., Fiedler K., Ferreira M.B., Almeida T. Reasoning about others' reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2013, 49(3):486-491. 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010.
29. Mevel K., Poirel N., Rossi S., Cassotti M., Simon G., Houdé O., et al. Bias detection: Response confidence evidence for conflict sensitivity in the ratio bias task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2014, 27:1-11. 10.1080/20445911.2014.986487.
30. Mirman D. Growth curve analysis and visualization using R 2014, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
31. Morsanyi K., Busdraghi C., Primi C. Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: A potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2014, 10(1):31. 10.1186/1744-9081-10-31.
32. Morsanyi K., Handley S.J. Logic feels so good-like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38(3):596-616. 10.1037/a0026099.
33. Oechssler J., Roider A., Schmitz P.W. Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2009, 72(1):147-152. 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018.
34. Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Seli P., Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 2012, 123(3):335-346. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003.
35. Pennycook G., Fugelsang J.A., Koehler D.J. What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology 2015, 80:34-72. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001.
36. Primi C., Morsanyi K., Chiesi F., Donati M.A., Hamilton J. The development and testing of a new version of the Cognitive Reflection Test applying Item Response Theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2015, (Advance online publication). 10.1002/bdm.1883.
37. Rodden K., Fu X., Aula A., Spiro I. Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages. CHI '08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems 2008, 2997-3002. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
38. Rolison J.J., Evans J.St.B.T., Walsh C.R., Dennis I. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64:1494-1514. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.003.
39. Satterthwaite F.E. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 1946, 2(6):110-114. 10.2307/3002019.
40. Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Kuehberger A., Ranyard R. A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user's guide 2010, Psychology Press.
41. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 141(3):423-428. 10.1037/a0025391.
42. Sherman J.W., Gawronski B., Trope Y. Dual-process theories of the social mind 2014, Guilford Publications.
43. Sloman S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119(1):3. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.
44. Sloman S.A. Two systems of reasoning: An update. Dual process theories of the social mind 2014, 69-79. Guilford Press, New York, NY, US. J.W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, Y. Trope (Eds.).
45. Spivey M.J., Grosjean M., Knoblich G. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(29):10393-10398. 10.1073/pnas.0503903102.
46. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94(4):672-695. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672.
47. Stupple E.J.N., Ball L.J. Belief-logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model. Thinking & Reasoning 2008, 14(2):168-181.
48. Toplak M.E., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39(7):1275-1289. 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1.