Feelings of error in reasoning—in search of a phenomenon

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 383-396

  Gangemi, Amelia ^a,b   Bourgeois Gironde, Sacha ^c   Mancini, Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^b Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PANTHÉON ASSAS   (France)

Author keywords

Bat and ball problem; Cognitive biases; Feelings of error; Feelings of error questionnaire; Feelings of rightness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940439061     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2014.980755     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. L.Carbonnell, & M.Falkenstein, (2006). Does the error negativity reflect the degree of response conflict? Brain Research, 1095, 124–130.
2. M.E.Coles, R.O.Frost, R.G.Heimberg, & J.Rhéaume, (2003). Not just right experiences: Perfectionism, obsessive–compulsive features and general psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 681–700.
3. M.E.Coles, R.G.Heimberg, R.O.Frost, & G.Steketee, (2005). Not just right experiences and obsessive–compulsive features: Experimental and self-monitoring perspectives. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 153–167.
4. W.De Neys, (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38.
5. W.De Neys, & J.F.Bonnefon, (2013). The whys and whens of individual differences in individual thinking biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 172–178.
6. W.De Neys, S.Cromheeke, & M.Osman, (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS One, 6(1), e15954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
7. W.De Neys, & V.Feremans, (2012). Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school. Developmental Psychology, 49, 258–269.
8. W.De Neys, & T.Glumicic, (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248–1299.
9. W.De Neys, E.Moyens, & D.Vansteenwegen, (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 208–216.
10. W.De Neys, S.Rossi, & O.Houdé, (2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 269–273.
11. A.Efklides, (2006). Metacognitive and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.
12. S.Frederick, (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
13. S.Glucksberg, & M.McCloskey, (1981). Decisions about ignorance: Knowing that you don't know. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 311–325.
14. J.Haidt, (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
15. A.Harvey, E.Watkins, W.Mansell, & R.Shafran, (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders. A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. D.Kahneman, (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
17. D.Kahneman, & S.Frederick, (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T.Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. A.Koriat, (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171.
19. A.Koriat, & R.Levy-Sadot, (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgements: Information based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S.Chaiken & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. J.Metcalfe, (2000). Feelings and judgements of knowing: Is there a special poetic state? Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 178–186.
21. T.O.Nelson, & L.Narens, (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowledge ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368.
22. M.Piattelli-Palmarini, (1994). Inevitable illusions. New York, NY: Wiley.
23. J.A.Prowse Turner, & V.Thompson, (2009). The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 69–100.
24. L.Reder, & C.Schunn, (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. J.M.Shynkaruk, & V.A.Thompson, (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 619–632.
26. K.E.Stanovich, & R.F.West, (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.
27. V.A.Thompson, (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J.Evans & K.Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. V.A.Thompson, J.S.B.T.Evans, J. St. B. T., & J.I.C.Campbell, (2013). Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and it feels good. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 431–452.
29. V.A.Thompson, & S.J.Johnson, (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 215–244.
30. V.A.Thompson, & K.Morsanyi, (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11, 93–105.
31. V.A.Thompson, J.A.Prowse Turner, & G.Pennycook, (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.