Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 269-273

  de Neys, Wim ^a,b,c   Rossi, Sandrine ^a,b,c   Houdé, Olivier ^a,b,c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Alliance for Higher Education and research Sorbonne Paris Cité   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

Decision making; Judgment and decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874687253     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 569-576.
2. Berk, R. A. (2006). Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching: A consumer' s guide to rating scale Construction, assessement, and decision making for faculty, administrators, and clinicians. Sterling: Stylus.
3. Bourgeois-Gironde, S., & Vanderhenst, J. B. (2009). How to open the door to System 2: Debiasing the Bat and Ball problem. In S. Watanabe, A. P. Bloisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young (Eds.), Rational animals, irrational humans (pp. 235-252). Tokyo: Keio University Press.
4. De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28-38.
5. De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE, e15954. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0015954.
6. De Neys, W., & Feremans, V. (2012). Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school. Developmental Psychology. doi: 10. 1037/a0028320. ISSN: 0012-1649.
7. Evans, J. B. S. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
8. Evans, J. B. S. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: a dual process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313-326.
9. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
10. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
11. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics & biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 267-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
14. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 237-241.
15. Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Thompson, V. A., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11, 93-105.
18. Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Choosing between intuition and reason: The role of metacognition in initiating analytic thinking. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107-140.
19. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1275-1289.