Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking

Cognition

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1248-1299

  De Neys, Wim ^a   Glumicic, Tamara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conflict monitoring; Decision making; Dual process theories; Heuristics and biases; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTYPY; THINKING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; THINKING;

EID: 38649121155     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ball L.J., Phillips P., Wade C.N., and Quayle J.D. Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models. Experimental Psychology 53 (2006) 77-86
2. Burns B.D., and Wieth M. The collider principle in causal reasoning: Why the monty hall dilemma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2004) 434-449
3. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., and Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 624-652
4. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., and Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2004) 539-546
5. Crutcher R.J. Telling what we know. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 241-252
6. Denes-Raj V., and Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1994) 819-829
7. De Neys W. Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing in reasoning: Chronometric and dual task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 1070-1100
8. De Neys W. Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 428-433
9. De Neys W., Schaeken W., and d'Ydewalle G. Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning 11 (2005) 349-381
10. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologists 49 (1994) 709-724
11. Epstein S., and Pacini R. Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (1999), Guilford Press, New York 462-482
12. Ericsson K.A., and Simon H.A. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87 (1980) 215-251
13. Ericsson K.A., and Simon H.A. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Evans J.St.B.T. Heuristic and analytic processing in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology 75 (1984) 451-468
15. Evans J.St.B.T. Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 978-996
16. Evans J.St.B.T. In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 454-459
17. Evans J.St.B.T. On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning (2007) 10.1080/13546780601008825
18. Evans J.St.B.T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and Evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 (2007) 378-395
19. Evans J.St.B.T., and Over D.E. Rationality and reasoning (1996), Psychology Press, Hove, UK
20. Feldman Barrett L., Tugade M.M., and Engle R.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004) 553-573
21. Ferreira M.B., Garcia-Marques L., Sherman S.J., and Garrido M. Automatic and controlled components of judgment under uncertainty. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 28 (2006) 1293-1298
22. Gigerenzer G., Hell W., and Blank H. Presentation and content: the use of base rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 513-525
23. Gigerenzer G., and Regier T. How do we tell an association from a rule?: Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996) 23-26
24. Glanzer M., and Cunitz A.R. Two storage systems in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 5 (1966) 351-360
25. Goel V. Sketches of thought (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Handley S.J., Capon A., Beveridge M., Dennis I., and Evans J.St.B.T. Working memory, inhibitory control, and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 10 (2004) 175-195
27. Hertwig R., and Gigerenzer G. The 'conjunction fallacy' revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 (1999) 275-305
28. Hoffrage U. Why the analyses of cognitive processes matter. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 679-680
29. Houdé O., and Moutier S. Deductive reasoning and experimental inhibition training: The case of the matching bias. Current Psychology of Cognition 15 (1996) 409-434
30. James W. The principles of psychology (1890), Holt, Oxford, England
31. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., and Wooley J.D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111 (1982) 228-238
32. Kahneman, D. (2002, December). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgement and choice. Nobel Prize Lecture. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf.
33. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 49-81).
34. Kahneman D., and Frederick S. A model of heuristic judgement. In: Holyoak K.J., and Morrison R.G. (Eds). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 267-293
35. Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
36. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80 (1973) 237-251
37. MacDonald A.W., Cohen J.D., Stenger V.A., and Carter C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288 (2000) 1835-1838
38. Markovits H., and Doyon C. Information processing and reasoning with premises that are empirically false: Interference, working memory, and processing speed. Memory and Cognition 32 (2004) 592-601
39. Moors A., and de Houwer J. Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin 132 (2006) 297-326
40. Moutier S., and Houdé O. Judgements under uncertainty and conjunction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking and Reasoning 9 (2003) 185-201
41. Oaksford M., and Chater N. Rationality in an uncertain world: Essays on the cognitive science of human reasoning (1998), Psychology Press, Hove, UK
42. Osman M. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 988-1010
43. Pashler H., Johnston J., and Ruthruff E. Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (2001) 629-651
44. Payne J.W. Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 241-248
45. Reyna V.F., Lloyd F.J., and Brainerd C.J. Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgement and decision making. In: Schneider S., and Shanteau J. (Eds). Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York
46. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., and Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306 (2004) 443-447
47. Shiffrin R.M. Attention. In: Atkinson R.C., Herrnstein R.J., Lindsay G., and Luce R.D. (Eds). Steven's handbook of experiment psychology Vol. 2 (1988), Wiley, Oxford, England 739-811
48. Simoneau M., and Markovits H. Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: Evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval. Developmental Psychology 39 (2003) 964-975
49. Sloman S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996) 3-22
50. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 645-726
51. Stein E. Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
52. Todd P.M., and Gigerenzer G. Precis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 727-780
53. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131