Feeling we're biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 208-216

  De Neys, Wim ^a   Moyens, Elke ^b   Ansteenwegen, Debora V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; THINKING;

AROUSAL; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SKIN PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; THINKING;

EID: 77955912168     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.208     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ALEXANDER, B. (2009). Amid swine flu outbreak, racism goes viral. NBC Los Angeles. Retrieved June 11, 2009, from www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30467300/.
2. BALLANTYNE, C. (2009). Will Egypt's plans to kill pigs protect it from swine-sorry, H1N1 flu? Retrieved June 16, 2009, from www.scientificamerican. com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=will-egypts-plans-to-kill-pigs-prot-2009- 05-01.
3. BECHARA, A., DAMASIO, H., TRANEL, D., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295. (Pubitemid 27114154)
4. BOTVINICK, M. M., COHEN, J. D., & CARTER, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546. (Pubitemid 39536251)
5. BOTVINICK, M. M., & ROSEN, Z. B. (2009). Anticipation of cognitive demand during decision-making. Psychological Research, 73, 835-842.
6. CRITCHLEY, H. D., TANG, J., GLASER, D., BUTTERWORTH, B., & DOLAN, R. J. (2005). Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response. NeuroImage, 27, 885-895. (Pubitemid 41317257)
7. DAMASIO, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
8. DAWSON, M. E., SCHELL, A. M., & FILION, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200-223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. DE NEYS, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428-433. (Pubitemid 43657918)
10. DE NEYS, W., CROMHEEKE, S., & OSMAN, M. (2009). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. DE NEYS, W., & FRANSSENS, S. (2009). Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part. Cognition, 113, 45-61.
12. DE NEYS, W., & GLUMICIC, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248-1299. (Pubitemid 351172238)
13. DE NEYS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2005). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 349-381. (Pubitemid 43860320)
14. DE NEYS, W., VARTANIAN, O., & GOEL, V. (2008). Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science, 19, 483-489.
15. EPSTEIN, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724. (Pubitemid 24976708)
16. EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459. (Pubitemid 37188789)
17. EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
18. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., & OVER, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
19. FRANSSENS, S., & DE NEYS, W. (2009). The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 105-128.
20. GOEL, V., & DOLAN, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87, B11-B22. (Pubitemid 36034225)
21. HAJCAK, G., MCDONALD, N., & SIMONS, R. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895-903. (Pubitemid 37428923)
22. HORNIK, R., JACOBSOHN, L., ORWIN, R., PIESSE, A., & KALTON, G. (2008). Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 2229-2236.
23. HOUDÉ, O. (2007). First insights on "neuropedagogy of reasoning." Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 81-89.
24. KAHNEMAN, D. (2002, December). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel Prize lecture. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/economics/laureates/2002/ kahnemann-lecture.pdf.
25. KAHNEMAN, D., & FREDERICK, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P., & TVERSKY, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. KOBAYASHI, N., YOSHINO, A., TAKAHASHI, Y., & NOMURA, S. (2007). Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution. Autonomic Neuroscience, 132, 70-75. (Pubitemid 46274538)
28. MARKOVITS, H., & NANTEL, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, 17, 11-17. (Pubitemid 19028963)
29. OAKHILL, J., JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., & GARNHAM, A. (1989). Believability and syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 31, 117-140.
30. PAEK, H.-J., & GUNTHER, A. C. (2007). How peer proximity moderates indirect media influence on adolescent smoking. Communication Research, 34, 407-432.
31. RIDDERINKHOF, K. R., ULLSPERGER, M., CRONE, E. A., & NIEUWENHUIS, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443-447. (Pubitemid 39372436)
32. SÁ, W. C., WEST, R. F., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497-510.
33. SLOMAN, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22. (Pubitemid 126021382)
34. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726. (Pubitemid 32146729)
35. THOMPSON, V. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. TOPOLINSKI, S., & STRACK, F. (2009). Scanning the "Fringe" of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness & Cognition, 18, 608-618.
37. TSUJII, T., & WATANABE, S. (2009). Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research, 1287, 118-125.
38. VAN VEEN, V., & CARTER, C. S. (2006). Conflict and cognitive control in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 237-240. (Pubitemid 44800067)
39. WASON, P. C., & EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141-154.
40. WINKIELMAN, P., & BERRIDGE, K. C. (2004). Unconscious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 120-123. (Pubitemid 38783086)