Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 182-191

  Campitelli, Guillermo ^a,b   Labollita, Martín ^c  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo

^b UNIVERSIDAD ABIERTA INTERAMERICANA   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cognitive reflection; Decision making; Heuristics; Open minded thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954495777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academic of Management Review, 3, 439-449.
2. Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baron, J. (1990). Reflectiveness and rational thinking: Response to Duemler and Mayer (1988). Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 391-392.
4. Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press. (4 edition).
5. Bevacqua, G., & Salvatore, N. (2009). Buenos Aires City. Tasas de inflación anual. Retrieved from http://bsascity.googlepages.com/inflation on December 16th 2009.
6. Bröder, A. (2003) Decision making with the adaptive toolbox: Influence of environmental structure, personality, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 611-625.
7. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92,938-956.
8. Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20-33.
9. Cokely, E. T., Parpart, P., & Schooler, L.J. (2009). On the link between cognitive control and heuristic processes. In N.A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2926-2931). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
10. Dunwoody, P. T. (2009). Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 116-125.
11. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processes accounts of reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
12. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
13. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
14. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.) (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Goldstein, D., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
17. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavailable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37- 44.
20. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schmitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioural biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 147-152.
21. Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision- making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1-27.
22. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Peters, E., & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky- choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 435-448.
24. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 59, 99-118.
25. Sloman, S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
26. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
27. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the Understanding/Acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349-385.
28. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
30. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
31. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.