Comprehension Tools for Teachers: Reading for Understanding from Prekindergarten Through Fourth Grade

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 379-401

  McDonald Connor, Carol ^a   Phillips, Beth M ^b   Kaschak, Michael ^c   Apel, Kenn ^d   Kim, Young Suk ^b   Al Otaiba, Stephanie ^e   Crowe, Elizabeth C ^b   Thomas Tate, Shurita ^f   Johnson, Lakeisha Cooper ^g   Lonigan, Christopher J ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic language; Children; Early childhood; Elementary school; Instruction; Intervention; Literacy; Middle childhood; Oral language; Preschool; Reading comprehension; Small group intervention; Students; Tier 2

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956827442     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-014-9267-1     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Adolph, K. E. (2000). Specificity of learning: why infants fall over a veritable cliff. Psychological Science, 11, 290–295.
2. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381.
3. Apel, K., & Diehm, E. (2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: a small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75. doi:10.1177/0022219413509964.
4. Apel, K., & Lawrence, J. (2011). Contributions of morphological awareness skills to word-level reading and spelling in first-grade children with and without speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1312–1327.
5. Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305.
6. Apel, K., Brimo, D., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarten, first, and second grade students from low SES homes: a feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 161–173.
7. Baker, L. (1984). Children’s effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 588–597.
8. Baker, L., & Stein, N. (1981). The development of prose comprehension skills. In C. Santa & B. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s prose comprehension: research and practice (pp. 7–43). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.
10. Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press.
11. Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of language impairment. Reading and Writing, 19, 77–98.
12. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: a systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
14. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Bybee, R. W., & Kennedy, D. (2005). Math and science achievement. Science, 307, 481.
16. Cain, K. (1996). Story knowledge and comprehension skill. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and intervention (pp. 167–192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 429–441.
18. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.
19. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
20. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.
21. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004.
22. Charity, A. H., Scarborough, H. S., & Griffin, D. M. (2004). Familiarity with school English in African American children and its relation to early reading achievement. Child Development, 75, 1340–1356.
23. Connor, C. M. (2013). Intervening to support reading comprehension development with diverse learners. In B. Miller & L. E. Cutting (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological and genetic components of reading comprehension: the dyslexia foundation and NICHD (pp. 222–232). Baltimore: Brookes.
24. Connor, C. M., & Craig, H. K. (2006). African American preschoolers’ language, emergent literacy skills, and use of African American English: a complex relation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 771–792.
25. Connor, C. M., Kaya, S., Luck, M., Toste, J., Canto, A., Rice, D. C., & Underwood, P. (2010). Content-area literacy: individualizing student instruction in second grade science. Reading Teacher, 63(6), 474–485.
26. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M., Underwood, P., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Classroom instruction, child × instruction interactions and the impact of differentiating student instruction on third graders’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 189–221.
27. Connor, C. M., Rice, D. C., Canto, A. I., Southerland, S. A., Underwood, P., Kaya, S., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). Child characteristics by science instruction interactions in second and third grade and their relation to students' content-area knowledge, vocabulary, and reading skill gains. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 52–75.
28. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized control study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from 1st through 3rd grade. Psychological Science, 24, 1408–1419.
29. Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Loftus, S., Zipoli, R., & Kapp, S. (2010). Direct vocabulary instruction in kindergarten: teaching for breadth vs. depth. Elementary School Journal, 110, 1–18.
30. Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2004a). Language variation and language learning. In A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: development and disorders (pp. 228–247). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2004b). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 450–463.
32. Craig, H. K., Zhang, L., Hensel, S. L., & Quinn, E. J. (2009). African American English-speaking students: an examination of the relationship between dialect shifting and reading outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 839–855.
33. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.
34. Dickinson, D. K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. K. (2010). Speaking out for language: why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39, 305–310.
35. Duncan, G., J., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. (2008). Economic costs of early childhood poverty (vol. 4): Partnership for America's Economic Success.
36. Dymock, S. (2007). Comprehension strategy instruction: teaching narrative text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 61, 161–167.
37. Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1-1-44.
38. Englert, C. S., Hiebert, E. H., & Stewart, S. R. (1988). Detecting and correcting inconsistencies in the monitoring of expository prose. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 221–227.
39. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. doi:10.1080/17470210701623605.
40. Fitzgerald, J. (1989). Research on stories: implications for teachers. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text: research into practice (pp. 2–36). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41. Garner, R., & Anderson, J. (1981). Monitoring-of-understanding research: inquiry directions, methodological dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 70–76.
42. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: a review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
43. Gillam, R., & Pearson, N. (2004). Test of narrative language. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
44. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(3), 558–565.
45. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japunitich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 96(3), 424–436.
46. Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects of literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285.
47. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
48. Graesser, A. C., Dowell, N., & Moldovan, C. (2014). A computer’s understanding of literature. Scientific Studies of Literature, (in press)
49. Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 98–107.
50. Hall, K., Sabey, B., & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 26, 211–234.
51. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.
52. Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 436–441.
53. Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49, 4–14.
54. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
55. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514.
56. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H. R., Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (2007). The varieties of speech to children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1062–1083.
57. Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–89. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.005.
58. Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: the independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.
59. Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M., & Niemi, P. (1998). Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 353–375.
60. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognitions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410.
62. Konstantopoulos, S., & Chung, N. (2011). The persistence of teacher effects in elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 361–386.
63. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2004). The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 924–943.
65. Lee, E. C., & Rescorla, L. (2008). The use of psychological state words by late talkers at ages 3, 4, and 5 years. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 21–39.
66. Lonigan, C. J. & Schatschneider, C. (2013, July). Explaining reading comprehension of elementary school children: a latent-variable approach to the simple view of reading. Presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Hong Kong, China.
67. Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don’t understand: a preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.
68. Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand: elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643–655.
69. Melby-Lervåg, Monica, & Lervåg, Arne. (2013). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: a meta-analysis of studies comparing first- and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin (no pagination specified).
70. Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of primary-grade text complexity: learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 235–258.
71. Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). Motion detection and motion words: language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science, 18, 1007–1013.
72. Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2004). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 810–851). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
73. National Center for Education Statistics [NAEP], Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. (2013). Fast facts: english language learners. Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=96. Accessed December
74. Park, L. S. (2001). A single shard. Clarion Books.
75. Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.
76. Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. Paper presented at the Assessing reading in the 21st century conference: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences, Philadelphia PA.
77. Phillips, B. M. (2014). Promotion of syntactical development and oral comprehension: development and initial evaluation of a small -group intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, (in press)
78. Phillips, Tabulda, Jangra, Burris, Sedgwick, & Chen (2014). Developing preschoolers’ language and comprehension proficiency: an experimental trial. (in preparation)
79. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., Morrison, F. J., & NICHD-ECCRN. (2007). TEACHING: opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315, 1795–1796.
80. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.
81. Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: an integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 276–279.
82. Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: a perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 389–312.
83. Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., McCoach, D. B., Jacobs, J. K., & Coyne, M. (2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 299–314.
84. Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M., & Kaniskan, R. B. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 462–501.
85. Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., & Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 276–305.
86. Ruffman, T. (1999). Children’s understanding of logical inconsistency. Child Development, 70, 872–886.
87. Schubert, T. W. (2004). The power in your hand: gender differences in bodily feedback from making a fist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 757–769.
88. Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117, 39–44.
89. Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2012). The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up-down axis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 708–714.
90. Silverman, R. D., & Hines, S. (2009). The effects of multimedia-enhanced instruction on the vocabulary of English-language learners and non-English-language learners in pre-kindergarten through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 305–314.
91. Skibbe, L. E., Phillips, B. M., Day, S., Brophy-Herb, H. E., & Connor, C. M. D. (2012). Children’s early literacy growth in relation to classmates’ self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 451–553.
92. Snow, C. E. (2001). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education and the Science and Technology Policy Institute.
93. Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328, 450–452.
94. Stevens, R. J., Van Meter, P., & Warcholak, N. D. (2010). The effects of explicitly teaching story structure to primary grade children. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 159–198.
95. Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.
96. Taylor, J. E., Roehrig, A. D., Connor, C. M., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512–514.
97. Terry, N. P., Connor, C. M., Thomas-Tate, S., & Love, M. (2010). Examining relationships among dialect variation, literacy skills, and school context in first grade. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 126–145.
98. Terry, N. P., Connor, C. M., Petscher, Y., & Conlin, C. A. (2012). Dialect variation and reading: is change in nonmainstream American English use related to reading achievement in first and second grade? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 55–69.
99. Thomas-Tate, S., & Connor, C. M. (2013). Intervening to support reading comprehension with diverse learners. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington DC.
100. Tompkins, G. E., & McGee, L. M. (1989). Teaching repetition as a story structure. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text: research into practice (pp. 59–78). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
101. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early intervention in reading: the lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.
102. Trabasso, T. (1981). Can we integrate research and instruction on reading comprehension? In C. Santa & B. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s prose comprehension: research and practice (pp. 103–116). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
103. Trabasso, T., & Wiley, J. (2005). Goal plans of action and inferences during comprehension of narratives. Discourse Processes, 39, 129–164.
104. van der Lely, H. K. J., & Marshall, C. R. (2010). Assessing component language deficits in the early detection of reading difficulty risk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 357–368.
105. van Kleeck, A. (2008). Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: the importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook-sharing interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 627–643.
106. Weiser, B., & Mathes, P. (2011). Using encoding instruction to improve the reading and spelling performances of elementary students at risk for literacy difficulties: a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 81, 170–200.
107. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Laurer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., & de Cani, J. S. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 538–550.
108. Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 1–20.
109. Willson, V. L., & Rupley, W. H. (1997). A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 45–63.
110. Wolfram, W. (1971). Black and white speech differences revisited. In W. Wolfram & N. H. Clarke (Eds.), Black-white speech relationships (pp. 139–161). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
111. Wolter, J. A., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298.