Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 235-258

  Mesmer, Heidi Anne ^a   Cunningham, James W ^b   Hiebert, Elfrieda H ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869173855     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/RRQ.019     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. ACT. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Adler, M.A., Hiebert, E.H., & Fisher, C.W. (2000). English language development in the NEARStar ESL/PBR model: Stages I-IV (Report No. 1.2). Ann Arbor: LITT/University of Michigan. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from textproject.org/library/articles/english-language-development-in-the-nearstar- esl-pbr-model
4. Aukerman, R.C. (1984). Approaches to beginning reading (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Barr, R. (1973). Instructional pace differences and their effect on reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 9(4), 526-554. doi:10.2307/747001
6. Beaver, J. (1997). Developmental reading assessment. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration.
7. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Biemiller, A. (2010). Words worth teaching: Closing the vocabulary gap. Columbus, OH: SRA.
9. Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498-520. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498
10. Bloomfield, L., & Barnhart, C.L. (1961). Let's read: A linguistic approach. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
11. Bond, G.L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2(4), 5-142. doi:10.2307/746948
12. Bormuth, J.R. (1985). A response to "Is the Degrees of Reading Power Test valid or invalid?" Journal of Reading, 29(1), 42-47.
13. Bruner, J.S. (1965). Man: A course of study (Paper No. 3). Cambridge, MA: Educational Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED178390)
14. Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
15. California English/Language Arts Committee. (1987). Englishlanguage arts framework for California public schools (kindergarten through grade twelve). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
16. California English/Language Arts Committee. (1999). Englishlanguage arts framework for California public schools (kindergarten through grade twelve). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
17. California State Board of Education. (2007). Reading/language arts framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
18. Carver, R.P. (1985). Is the Degrees of Reading Power Test valid or invalid? Journal of Reading, 29(1), 34-41.
19. Cervetti, G.N., Bravo, M.A., Hiebert, E.H., Pearson, P.D., & Jaynes, C.A. (2009). Text genre and science content: Ease of reading, comprehension, and reader preference. Reading Psychology, 30(6), 487-511. doi:10.1080/ 02702710902733550
20. Chall, J.S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate (Rev. ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
21. Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
22. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589-608. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
23. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
24. Compton, D.L., Appleton, A.C., & Hosp, M.K. (2004). Exploring the relationship between text-leveling systems and reading accuracy and fluency in second-grade students who are average and poor decoders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(3), 176-184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00102.x (Pubitemid 38847175)
25. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M., Underwood, P.S., et al. (2011). Testing the impact of child characteristics × instruction interactions on third graders' reading comprehension by differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 189-221.
26. Connor, C.M., Piasta, S.B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., et al. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child by instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development. Child Development, 80(1), 77-100. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008. 01247.x
27. Corrigan, R., & Surber, J.R. (2010). The reading level paradox: Why children's picture books are less cohesive than adult books. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 32-54. doi:10.1080/01638530902728298
28. Cunningham, A.E., Nathan, R.G., & Raher, K.S. (2011). Orthographic processing in models of word recognition. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Aff lerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 259-285). New York: Routledge.
29. Cunningham, J.W., Koppenhaver, D.A., Erickson, K.A., & Spadorcia, S.A. (2004). Word identification and text characteristics. In J.V. Hoffman & D.L. Schallert (Eds.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp. 21-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Cunningham, J.W., Spadorcia, S.A., Erickson, K.A., Koppenhaver, D.A., Sturm, J.M., & Yoder, D.E. (2005). Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 410-427. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.2 (Pubitemid 41560605)
31. Dale, E., & O'Rourke, J. (1981). The living word vocabulary: A national vocabulary inventory. Chicago: World Book/Childcraft International.
32. Davison, A., & Kantor, R. (1982). On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(2), 187-210. doi:10.2307/747483
33. Department of Education and Science. (1993). English for ages 5 to 16: National curriculum proposals of the secretary of state for education and the secretary of state for Wales. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
34. Duke, N.K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202-224.
35. Erickson, K.A., Koppenhaver, D.A., & Cunningham, J.W. (2006). Balanced reading intervention and assessment in augmentative communication. In R.J. McCauley & M.E. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 309-345). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
36. Ericsson, K.A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R.W. (2009). Toward a science of exceptional achievement: Attaining superior performance through deliberate practice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1172, 199-217. doi:10.1196/annals.1393.001
37. Foorman, B.R., & Connor, C.M. (2011). Primary grade reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 136-156). New York: Routledge.
38. Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Davidson, K.C., Harm, M.W., & Griffin, J. (2004). Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 167-197. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0802-4 (Pubitemid 38726499)
39. Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37-55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
40. Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
41. Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (1999). Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading, K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
42. Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (2009). The Fountas and Pinnell leveled book list: K-8+. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
43. Furneaux, B., & Wade, M. (2009). Theoretical constructs and relationships in information systems research. In Y.K Dwivedi, B. Lal, M.D. Williams, S.L. Schneberger, & M. Wade (Eds.), Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (pp. 1-17). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.ch001
44. Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children's narrative and informational reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 1-37. doi:10.1093/applin/25.1.1
45. Garrison, J.W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 12-18.
46. Gates, A.I., & Russell, D.H. (1938). Types of materials, vocabulary burden, word analysis, and other factors in beginning reading. The Elementary School Journal, 39(1), 27-35, 119-128. doi:10.1086/457562
47. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
49. Goodman, K.S., & Goodman, Y.M. (1979). Learning to read is natural. In L.B. Resnick & P.A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 137-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Grabe, W. (2002). Narrative and expository macro-genres. In A.M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 249-267). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Louwerse, M.M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A.P. Sweet & C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford.
52. Graesser, A.C., Swamer, S.S., Baggett, W.B., & Sell, M.A. (1996). New models of deep comprehension. In B.K. Britton & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 1-32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
54. Grimes, J.E. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
55. Guthrie, J.T., Coddington, C.S., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Profiles of reading motivation among African American and Caucasian students. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(3), 317-353. doi:10.1080/10862960903129196
56. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
57. Hargis, C.H., & Gickling, E.E. (1978). The function of imagery in word recognition development. The Reading Teacher, 31(8), 870-874.
58. Harré, R. (2004). Modeling: Gateway to the unknown: A work (D. Rothbart, Ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
59. Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
60. Hatcher, P.J. (2000). Predictors of Reading Recovery book levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 67-77. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00103
61. Hiebert, E.H. (1999). Text matters in learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 552-566.
62. Hiebert, E.H. (2005). State reform policies and the task textbooks pose for first-grade readers. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 245-266. doi:10.1086/428743 (Pubitemid 40176976)
63. Hiebert, E.H. (2008). The word zone f luency curriculum: An alternative approach. In M.R. Kuhn & P.J. Schwanenf lugel (Eds.), Fluency in the classroom (pp. 154-170). New York: Guilford.
64. Hiebert, E.H. (2011). Texts for beginning readers: The search for optimal scaffolds. In C.F. Conrad & R.C. Serlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 413-428). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Hoffman, J.V. (2002). The words in basal readers: A historical perspective from the United States. In R. Fisher, M. Lewis, & G. Brooks (Eds.), Raising standards in literacy (pp. 82-97). London: RoutledgeFalmer. doi:10.4324/9780203166222-chapter-6
66. Howes, D.H., & Solomon, R.L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(6), 401-410. doi:10.1037/h0056020
67. Hunt, K.W. (1964). Differences in grammatical structures written at three grade levels, the structures to be analyzed by transformational methods. Tallahassee: Florida State University.
68. Jenkins, J.R., Peyton, J.A., Sanders, E.A., & Vadasy, P.F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 53-85. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0801-4 (Pubitemid 38726503)
69. Johnston, F.R. (2000). Word learning in predictable text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 248-255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.248
70. Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 458-492. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.4.2
71. Juel, C., & Roper/Schneider, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 134-152. doi:10.2307/747751
72. Juel, C., & Solso, R.L. (1981). The role of orthographic redundancy, versatility and spelling-sound correspondences in word identif ication. In M.L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (30th yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 74-82). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
73. Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4/5), 323-345. doi:10.1080/01638530802145486
74. Karlsson, A.M. (2009). Positioned by reading and writing: Literacy practices, roles, and genres in common occupations. Written Communication, 26(1), 53-76. doi:10.1177/0741088308327445
75. Kearsley, G. (1994). Explorations in learning and instruction: The Theory Into Practice database. Retrieved March 12, 2012, from home.sprynet.com/ ~gkearsley/tip/theories.html
76. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Klare, G.R. (1984). Readability. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
78. Kolker, B., & Terwilliger, P.N. (1981). Sight vocabulary learning of first and second graders. Reading World, 20(4), 251-258. doi:10.1080/ 19388078109557604
79. Laing, E., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers' ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73(3), 183-207. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2500
80. Landauer, T.K., Kireyev, K., & Panaccione, C. (2011). Word maturity: A new metric for word knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 92-108. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.536130
81. Langer, J.A., Campbell, J.R., Neuman, S.B., Mullis, I.V.S., Persky, H.R., & Donahue, P.L. (1995). Reading assessment redesigned: Authentic texts and innovative instruments in NAEP's 1992 survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
82. Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2011). Promises and problems of teaching with popular culture: A linguistic ethnographic analysis of discourse genre mixing in a literacy lesson. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 40-69. doi:10.1598/RRQ.46.1.3
83. Leslie, L., & Calhoon, A. (1995). Factors affecting children's reading of rimes: Reading ability, word frequency, and rime-neighborhood size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 576-586. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.4. 576 (Pubitemid 126011555)
84. Martin, B., & Brogan, P. (1971). Teacher's guide to the instant readers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
85. McNamara, D.S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and lowcoherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51-62. doi:10.1037/h0087352 (Pubitemid 33599991)
86. Meek, M. (1988). How texts teach what readers learn. Stroud, UK: Thimble.
87. Merrill, M.D., Drake, L., Lacy, M.J., Pratt, J.A., & the ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.
88. Mesmer, H.A. (2005). Decodable text and the first grade reader. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(1), 61-86. doi:10.1080/10573560590523667
89. Mesmer, H.A. (2008). Tools for matching readers to texts. New York: Guilford.
90. Meyer, B.J.F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
91. Meyer, B.J.F. (2003). Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Di sorder s, 23(3), 204-224. doi:10.1097/00011363-200307000-00007 (Pubitemid 37089252)
92. Miller, G.A., Bruner, J.S., & Postman, L. (1954). Familiarity of letter sequences and tachistoscopic identification. The Journal of General Psychology, 50(1), 129-139. doi:10.1080/00221309.195 4.9710109
93. Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304-330. doi:10.2307/747823
94. Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D.S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228-242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
96. Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C., & Madigan, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values of 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1, Pt. 2), 1-25. doi:10.1037/h0025327
97. Pearson, P.D. (1974). The effects of grammatical complexity on children's comprehension, recall, and conception of certain semantic relations. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(2), 155-192. doi:10.2307/747180
98. Pearson, P.D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 216-252. doi: 10.1177/0895904803260041 (Pubitemid 38169744)
99. Peterson, B. (1991). Selecting books for beginning readers. In D.E. DeFord, C.A. Lyons, & G.S. Pinnell (Eds.), Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery (pp. 119-147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
100. Pinnell, G.S., Lyons, C.A., DeFord, D.E., Bryk, A.S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 8-39. doi:10.2307/747736
101. Raman, I., & Baluch, B. (2001). Semantic effects as a function of reading skill in word naming of a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 14(7/8), 599-614. doi:10.1023/A:1012004729180 (Pubitemid 33810104)
102. Reading Recovery Council of North America. (1997, January). Reading Recovery comprehensive book list. Columbus, OH: Author.
103. Richardson, J.T.E. (1975). The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 13(3), 281-288. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(75)90004-4
104. Roberts, T.A., Christo, C., & Shefelbine, J.A. (2011). Word recognition. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 229-258). New York: Routledge.
105. Ruddell, R.B., & Unrau, N.J. (Eds.). (2004). Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
106. Samuels, S.J. (1970). Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 40(3), 397-407.
107. Saukkonen, P. (2007). Cognitive schemas behind statistics: Towards a system of text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 14(2/3), 242-264. doi:10.1080/09296170701514197
108. Schwanenflugel, P.J., & Akin, C.E. (1994). Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(3), 250-264. doi:10.2307/747876
109. Scott, J.A., Lubliner, S., & Hiebert, E.H. (2006). Constructs underlying word selection and assessment tasks in the archival research on vocabulary instruction. In J.V. Hoffman, D.L. Schallert, C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 55th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 264-275). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
110. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
111. Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94) 00645-2
112. Snow, C. (Ed.). (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
113. Spache, G.D. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53(7), 410-413. doi:10.1086/458513
114. Spencer, K. (2010). Predicting children's word-reading accuracy for common English words: The effect of word transparency and complexity. British Journal of Psychology, 101(3), 519-543. doi:10.1348/000712609X470752
115. Stauffer, R.G. (1970). The language-experience approach to the teaching of reading. New York: Harper & Row.
116. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2002). Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 207-214. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.207
117. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
118. Texas Education Agency. (1990). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on instructional materials. Austin: Author.
119. Texas Education Agency. (1997). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on instructional materials. Austin: Author. Tunmer, W.E., & Nicholson, T. (2011). The development and teaching of word recognition skill. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Aff lerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 405-431). New York: Routledge.
120. Veatch, J. (1959). Individualizing your reading program: Self-selection in action. New York: Putnam.
121. Wilkinson, P.A., & Patty, D. (1993). The effects of sentence combining on the reading comprehension of fourth grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 104-125.
122. Williamson, G.L. (2008). A text readability continuum for postsecondary readiness. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 602-632.
123. Woollams, A.M. (2005). Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: Convergence and divergence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 878-890. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.878 (Pubitemid 41677496)
124. Young, A.R., Bowers, P.G., & MacKinnon, G.E. (1996). Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers' fluency and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(1), 59-84. doi:10.1017/ S0142716400009462