Testing the impact of child characteristics × instruction interactions on third graders reading comprehension by differentiating literacy instruction

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 189-221

  Connor, Carol McDonald ^a   Morrison, Fredrick J ^b   Fishman, Barry ^b   Giuliani, Sarah ^a   Luck, Melissa ^a   Underwood, Phyllis S ^a   Bayraktar, Aysegul ^a   Crowe, Elizabeth C ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Article; Assessment; Childhood; Comprehension; Decoding; Methodology; Oral language; Profdev; Struggling; Theoretical; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051728348     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.46.3.1     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C.M., Folsom, J.S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (in press). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. The Elementary School Journal.
2. Anderson, R.C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J.T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & K. C.n, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford.
4. Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (1), 4462. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44 (Pubitemid 43551080)
5. BlocK. C.C., Parris, S.R., Reed, K.L., Whiteley, C.S., & Cleveland, M.D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2), 262281. doi:10.1037/a0014319
6. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Bos, C.S., Mather, N., Narr, R.F., & Babur, N. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14 (4), 227238. doi:10.1207/sldrp1404-4
8. Brophy, J.E. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (6), 733750. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.6.733
9. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (4), 671681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671 (Pubitemid 39666168)
10. Cameron, C.E. (2004, April). Variation in teacher organization. Paper presented at the 18th biennial Conference on Human Development, Washington, DC.
11. Catts, H.W., & Koćamhi, A.G. (Eds.). (2004). Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Chard, D.J. (2004). Toward a science of professional development in early reading instruction. Exceptionality, 12 (3), 175191. doi:10.1207/ s15327035ex1203-5
13. Cohen, D.K., Raudenbush, S.W., & Ball, D.L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25 (2), 119142. doi:10.3102/01623737025002119 (Pubitemid 37306409)
14. Connor, C.M., Jakobsons, L.J., Crowe, E.C., & Meadows, J.G. (2009). Instruction, student engagement, and reading skill growth in Reading First classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109 (3), 221250.
15. Connor, C.M., Jakobsons, L.J., & Granger, J. (2006). Individual differences in the reading fluency of children and their instructional implications: Instruction and fluency. Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
16. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B.J., Ponitz, C.C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P.S., et al. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38 (2), 8599. doi:10.3102/0013189X09332373
17. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B.J., Schatschneider, C., & Underwood, P. (2007). Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. Science, 315 (5811), 464465. doi:10.1126/science.1134513 (Pubitemid 46175738)
18. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., & Petrella, J.N. (2004). Effective reading comprehension instruction: Examining child X instruction interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (4), 682698. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4. 682 (Pubitemid 39666169)
19. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Schatschneider, C., Toste, J., Lundblom, E.G., Crowe, E., et al. (in press). Effective classroom instruction: Implications of child characteristic by instruction interactions on first graders word reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
20. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., & Slominski, L. (2006). Preschool instruction and childrens emergent literacy growth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (4), 665689. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.665 (Pubitemid 44747832)
21. Connor, C.M., Piasta, S.B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., et al. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child X instruction interactions on first graders literacy development. Child Development, 80 (1), 77100. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008. 01247.x
22. Cromley, J.G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (2), 311325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
23. Cronbach, L.J., & Snow, R.E. (1969). Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED029001)
24. Crowe, E.C., Connor, C.M., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Examining the core: Relations among reading curricula, poverty, and first through third grade reading achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 47 (3), 187214. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.02.002
25. Dahl, K.L., & Freppon, P.A. (1995). A comparison of innercity childrens interpretations of reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (1), 5074.
26. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27. Fishman, B.J., Marx, R.W., Best, S., & Tal, R.T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 (6), 643658. doi:10.1016/S0742- 051X(03)00059-3 (Pubitemid 36977243)
28. Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risK. C.ildren. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 3755. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
29. Foorman, B.R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M.N., Fletcher, J.M., Moats, L.C., & Francis, D.J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (1), 129. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004. 11.003 (Pubitemid 43045815)
30. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Gamse, B.C., Jacob, R.T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., & Unlu, F. (2008). Reading First Impact Study: Final report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
32. Garg, A.X., AdhiKoćari, N.K.J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M.P., Devereaux, P.J., Beyene, J., et al. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293 (10), 12231238. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 (Pubitemid 40327908)
33. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
34. Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Jayanthi, M., Kim, J., & Santoro, L. (2007, July). Impact of teacher study groups on observed teaching practice and student vocabulary and comprehension for first grade teachers: Results of large scale randomized controlled trials. Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Prague, Czech Republic.
35. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (3), 403423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403 (Pubitemid 39216561)
36. Hamre, B.K., Pianta, R.C., Downer, J., & Mashburn, A.J. (2007, April). Growth models of classroom quality over the course of the year in preschool programs. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
37. Hedges, L.V., & Hedberg, E.C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29 (1), 6087. doi:10.3102/0162373707299706
38. Improving Americas Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-382, § 1201 (1994).
39. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13 (10).
40. Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35 (4), 458492. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.4.2
41. Koćawamoto, K., Houlihan, C.A., Balas, E.A., & Lobach, D.F. (2005). Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. British Medical Journal, 330 (7494), 765768. doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F (Pubitemid 40522338)
42. Keenan, J.M., Betjemann, R.S., & Olson, R.K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12 (3), 281300. doi:10.1080/10888430802132279
43. Landis, J.R., & K. C., G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
44. Landry, S.H., Anthony, J.L., Swank, P.R., & Monseque-Bailey, P. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2), 448465. doi:10.1037/a0013842
45. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The nations report card: Reading 2007: National Assessment of Educational Progress at grades 4 and 8 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007496
46. Locke, J.L. (1993). The childs path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. MacGinitie, W.H., MacGinitie, R.K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L.G. (2006). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.) [Kit]. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
48. McClelland, M.M., Cameron, C.E., Connor, C.M., Farris, C.L., Jewkes, A.M., & Morrison, F.J. (2007). Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43 (4), 947959. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.947
49. Morrison, F.J., Bachman, H.J., & Connor, C.M. (2005). Improving literacy in America: Guidelines from research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. National Assessment Governing Board. (2006). Reading framework for the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
51. National Hurricane Center. (2009). Technical summary of the National Hurricane Center track and intensity models (Rev. ed.). Miami, FL: National Hurricane Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, NOAA/National Weather Service. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from www.nhc.noaa.gov/ modelsummary.shtml
52. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel.Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
53. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Multiple pathways to early academic achievement. Harvard Educational Review, 74 (1), 129.
54. Open Court Reading [Curriculum]. (2008). Washington, DC: IES What WorK. C.earinghouse. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/reports/ beginning-reading/open-court/
55. Perfetti, C.A. (2008, April). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. Paper presented at the Assessing Reading in the 21st Century Conference, Philadelphia.
56. Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
57. Pianta, R.C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Opportunities to learn in Americas elementary classrooms. Science, 315 (5820), 17951796. (Pubitemid 46580124)
58. Pianta, R.C., La Paro, K.M., Payne, C., Cox, M.J., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 102 (3), 225238. (Pubitemid 44289769)
59. Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26 (3), 448466.
60. Rapp, D.N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K.L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11 (4), 289312.
61. Raudenbush, S.W. (2007, April). Distinguished Contributions to Education Research Award (2006) lecture: How shall we study the cause and effects of classroom teaching? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
62. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
64. Raudenbush, S.W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5 (2), 199213.
65. Rayner, K., Foorman, B.R., Perfetti, C.A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2 (2), 3174. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.00004 (Pubitemid 33653575)
66. Roehrig, A.D., Duggar, S.W., Moats, L., Glover, M., & Mincey, B. (2008). When teachers work to use progress monitoring data to inform literacy instruction: Identifying potential supports and challenges. Remedial and Special Education, 29 (6), 364382. doi:10.1177/0741932507314021
67. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. Sabatini, J., & Albro, E. (Eds.). (in press). Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
69. Scarborough, H.S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61 (6), 17281743.
70. Scarborough, H.S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97110). New York: Guilford.
71. Shavelson, R.J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
72. Snow, C.E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
73. Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
74. Storch, S.A., & Whitehurst, G.J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38 (6), 934947. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
75. Tomlinson, C.A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
76. Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40 (1), 726. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00092-9
77. Tuyay, S., Jennings, L., & Dixon, C. (1991). Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third-grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 19 (1), 75110. doi:10.1080/01638539109544906
78. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C.R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B.K. Britton & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
80. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J.M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99 (2), 101128.
81. Williams, J.P., Stafford, K.B., Lauer, K.D., Hall, K.M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (1), 120.
82. Willson, V.L., & Rupley, W.H. (1997). A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1 (1), 4563. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0101-3
83. Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
84. YoshiKoćawa, H., & Hsueh, J. (2001). Child development and public policy: Toward a dynamic systems perspective. Child Development, 72 (6), 18871903. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00384 (Pubitemid 33602794)