Embedding Reading Comprehension Training in Content-Area Instruction

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-20

  Williams, Joanna P ^a   Stafford, K Brooke ^a   Lauer, Kristen D ^a   Hall, Kendra M ^a   Pollini, Simonne ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

comprehension; reading instruction; students at risk for academic failure; text structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849112253     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013152     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Anderson T.H., and Armbruster B.B. Content area textbooks. In: Anderson R.C., Osborn J., and Tierney R.J. (Eds). Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 193-226
2. Armbruster B.B., Anderson T.H., and Ostertag J. Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?. Reading Research Quarterly 22 (1987) 331-346
3. Baker L., and Brown A.L. Metacognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson P.D., Kamil M., Barr R., and Mosenthal P. (Eds). Handbook of reading research 1 (1984), Longman, New York 353-394
4. Beck I.L., McKeown M.G., and Kucan L. Creating robust vocabulary: Frequently asked questions and extended examples (2008), Guilford Press, New York
5. Beck I.L., McKeown M.G., Sinatra G.M., and Loxterman J.A. Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly 26 (1991) 251-276
6. Bernhardt E., Destino T., Kamil M., and Rodriguez-Munoz M. Assessing science knowledge in an English-Spanish bilingual elementary school. Cognosos 4 (1995) 4-6
7. Broer N.A., Aarnoutse C.A.J., Kieviet F.K., and Van Leeuwe J.F.J. The effect of instructing the structural aspect of texts. Educational Studies 28 (2002) 213-238
8. Brown A.L., Palincsar A.M., Armbruster B.B., Ruddell R.B., and Unrau N.J. Theoretical models and processes of reading. 5th ed. (2004), International Reading Association, Newark, DE 780-809
9. Brown R., Pressley M., VanMeter P., and Schuder T. A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1996) 18-37
10. Calfee R.C., and Chambliss M.J. Beyond decoding: Pictures of expository prose. Annals of Dyslexia 38 (1998) 243-257
11. Casteel C.P., and Isom B.A. Reciprocal processes in science and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher 47 (1994) 538-545
12. Chall J.S., and Dale E. Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula (1995), Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA
13. Chambliss M.J. Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly 30 (1995) 778-807
14. Chambliss M.J., and Calfee R.C. Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding. Educational Psychologist 24 (1998) 307-322
15. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
16. Corkhill A.J. Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review 4 (1992) 33-67
17. Coyne M.D., Simmons D.C., and Kame'enui E.J. Vocabulary instruction for young children at risk of experiencing reading difficulties: Teaching word meanings during shared storybook readings. In: Baumann J.F., and Kame'enui E.J. (Eds). Vocabulary instruction (2004), Guilford Press, New York 41-58
18. Danner F.W. Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology 68 (1976) 174-183
19. Dickson S. Integrating reading and writing to teach compare-contrast text structure: A research-based methodology. Reading and Writing Quarterly 14 (1999) 49-79
20. Dickson S., Simmons D.C., and Kame'enui E.J. Text organization: Research bases. In: Simmons D.C., and Kame'enui E.J. (Eds). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 239-277
21. Dole J.A., Duffy G., Roehler L.R., and Pearson P.D. Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61 (1991) 239-264
22. Dreher, M. J., & Baker, L. (2005, June). Balancing learning to read and reading for learning: Infusing information books into primary-grade classrooms. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
23. Duke N.K. 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in the first grade. Reading Research Quarterly 35 (2000) 202-224
24. Englert C.S., and Thomas C.C. Sensitivity to text structure in reading and learning: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly 10 (1987) 93-105
25. Fuchs L.S., and Fuchs D. Enhancing the mathematical problem solving of students with mathematics disabilities. In: Swanson H.L., Harris K.R., and Graham S. (Eds). Handbook of learning disabilities (2003), Guilford Press, New York 306-322
26. Goldman S.R., and Rakestraw Jr. J.A. Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In: Kamil M.L., Mosenthal P.B., Pearson P.D., and Barr R. (Eds). Handbook of reading research 3 (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 311-335
27. Gough P.B., Hoover W.A., and Peterson C.L. Some observations on a simple view of reading. In: Cornoldi C., and Oakhill J. (Eds). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1-13
28. Graham S., and Harris K.R. Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRCD studies. In: Swanson H.L., Harris K.R., and Graham S. (Eds). Handbook of learning disabilities (2003), Guilford Press, New York 323-344
29. Guthrie J.T., and Ozgungor S. Instructional contexts for reading engagement. In: Block C.C., and Pressley M. (Eds). Comprehension instruction: Researcher-based best practices (2002), Guilford Press, New York 275-288
30. Guthrie J.T., Wigfield A., Barbosa P., Perencevich K.C., Taboada A., Davis M.H., et al. Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (2004) 403-423
31. Hall J.A., Tickle-Degnan L., Rosenthal R., and Mosteller F. Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In: Cooper H., and Hedges L.V. (Eds). The handbook of research synthesis (1994), Sage, New York 17-28
32. Hall K.M., Sabey B.L., and McClellan M. Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 26 (2005) 211-234
33. Harris K.R., and Graham S. Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (1996), Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA
34. Hart J., and Lee O. Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal 27 (2003) 475-501
35. Hoffman J.V., McCarthy S.J., Nobott J., Christian C., Corman L., and Curry C. So what's new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior 26 (1994) 47-73
36. Holley C.D., and Dansereau D.F. Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues (1984), Academic Press, New York
37. Jenkins J.R., Heliotis J.D., Stein M.L., and Haynes M.C. Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children 54 (1987) 54-59
38. Kame'enui E.J., and Carnine D.W. Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (1998), Merrill, Columbus, OH
39. Kintsch W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition (1998), Cambridge University Press, New York
40. Kintsch W., and van Dijk T.A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 363-394
41. Lauer, K. D. (2002). The effect of text structure, content familiarity, and reading ability on second-graders' comprehension of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
42. Lee O., Buxton C., Lewis S., and LeRoy K. Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (2006) 607-636
43. Loman N.L., and Mayer R.E. Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (1983) 402-412
44. Lorch R.F., and Lorch E.P. Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (1995) 537-544
45. Lorch R.F., Lorch E.P., and Inman W.E. Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (1993) 281-290
46. Mautone P.D., and Mayer R.E. Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 377-389
47. Mayer R.E. Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning?. Review of Educational Research 49 (1979) 371-383
48. McKenna M.C., Ellsworth R.A., and Kear D.J. Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly 30 (1995) 934-956
49. Meyer B.J.F. Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behavior 7 (1975) 7-47
50. Meyer B.J.F., and Freedle R.O. Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal 21 (1984) 121-143
51. Meyer B.J.F., and Poon L.W. Effects of structure training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 3 (2001) 141-159
52. Meyer B.J.F., Theodorou E., Brezinski K.L., Middlemiss W., McDougall J., and Barlett B.J. Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2002) 486-519
53. Moss B. A qualitative assessment of first graders' retelling of expository text. Reading Research and Instruction 37 (1997) 1-13
54. Moss B., and Newton E. An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 23 (2002) 1-14
55. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (2000), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Washington, DC
56. Neuman S.B. The role of knowledge in early literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 36 (2001) 468-475
57. Pappas C.C. Is narrative "primary"? Some insights from kindergartners' pretend readings of stories and informational books. Journal of Reading Behavior 25 (1993) 97-129
58. Pearson P.D., and Duke N.K. Comprehension instruction in the primary grades. In: Collins-Block C., and Pressley M. (Eds). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2002), Guilford Press, New York 247-258
59. Pearson P.D., and Fielding L. Comprehension instruction. In: Barr R., Kamil M.L., Mosenthal P., and Pearson P.D. (Eds). Handbook of reading research 2 (1991), Longman, New York 815-860
60. Perfetti C.A., Marron M.A., and Foltz P.W. Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. In: Cornoldi C., and Oakhill J.V. (Eds). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and remediation (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 137-165
61. Pressley M. Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (1998), Guilford Press, New York
62. Pressley M. Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. 2nd ed. (2002), Guilford Press, New York
63. Pressley M., and McCormick C.B. Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers and policymakers (1995), HarperCollins College, New York
64. RAND Reading Study Group. Reading for understanding (2002), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
65. Reutzel D.R., Smith J.A., and Fawson P.C. An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 20 (2005) 276-305
66. Richgels D.J., McGee L.M., Lomax R.G., and Sheard C. Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 22 (1987) 177-196
67. Ruddell R.B. Teaching children to read and write. 4th ed. (2006), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
68. Salomon G., and Perkins D.N. Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist 24 (1989) 113-142
69. Scardamalia M., and Bereiter C. Writing. In: Dillon R.F., and Sternberg R.J. (Eds). Cognition and instruction (1986), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 59-81
70. Simonsen S. Identifying and teaching text structures in content area classrooms. In: Lapp D., Flood J., and Farnan N. (Eds). Content area reading and learning (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 59-75
71. Smolkin L.B., and Donovan C.A. Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality 11 (2003) 25-38
72. Snow C.E., Burns M.S., and Griffin P. Preventing reading difficulties in young children (1998), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
73. Spyridakis J.H., and Standahl T.C. Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 22 (1987) 285-298
74. Stein N.L., and Trabasso T. What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in instructional psychology 2 (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 213-267
75. Swanson H.L., and Hoskyn M. Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research 68 (1998) 271-321
76. Sweet A.P., and Snow C. Reconceptualizing reading comprehension. In: Collins-Block C., Gambrell L.B., and Pressley M. (Eds). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practices (2002), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 17-53
77. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd ed. (1996), HarperCollins, New York
78. Taylor B.M. Text structure and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Educational Psychology 74 (1982) 323-340
79. van den Broek P., Lorch E.P., and Thurlow R. Children's and adults' memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development 67 (1996) 3010-3028
80. van den Broek P., Risden K., Fletcher C.R., and Thurlowow R. A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In: Britton B.K., and Graesser A.C. (Eds). Models of understanding text (1996), Erlbaum, Mahweh, NJ 165-187
81. van Dijk T.A., and Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension (1983), Academic Press, New York
82. Wilder A.A., and Williams J.P. Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 268-278
83. Williams J.P. Improving the comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia 48 (1998) 213-238
84. Williams J.P., Hall K.M., and Lauer K.D. Building the basics of comprehension instruction: Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners. Exceptionality 12 (2004) 129-144
85. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., & DeSisto, L. A. (2006). Comparing and contrasting animals: Close analysis of text with structure (CATS). Unpublished manuscript.
86. Williams J.P., Hall K.M., Lauer K.D., Stafford K.B., DeSisto L.A., and de Cani J.S. Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 (2005) 538-550
87. Williams J.P., Lauer K.D., Hall K.M., Lord K.M., Gugga S.S., Bak S.J., et al. Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2002) 235-248
88. Wong B.Y.L., and Wilson M. Investigating awareness of and teaching passage organization in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities 17 (1984) 477-482
89. Woodcock R.N. Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised (1998), American Guidance Services, Circle Pines, MN