Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 428-449

  Carlisle, Joanne F ^a   Stone, C Addison ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Graduate Studies for the Educational Studies Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644518125     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. ADAMS, M.J. (1990). Beginnings read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. ANGLIN, J.M. (1993), Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development (Serial # 238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. BAUMANN, J.F., EDWARDS, E.C., FONT, G., TERESHINSKI, C.A., KAME'ENUI, E.J., & OLEJNIK, S.F. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150-176.
4. BROWN, G.D.A. (1998). The endpoint of skilled word recognition: The ROAR model. In J.L Metsala & L.C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 121-138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BRYANT, P., NUNES, T., & BINDMAN, M. (2000). The relations between children's linguistic awareness and spelling: The case of the apostrophe. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 255-276.
6. CARLISLE, J.F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
7. CARLISLE, J.F., & FLEMING, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239-253.
8. CARLISLE, J.F., & STONE, C.A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children's reading of derived words. In E. Assink & D. Santa (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 27-52). New York: Kluwer Academic.
9. CARLISLE, J.F., STONE, C.A., & KATZ, L.A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249-274.
10. CARROLL, J.B., DAVIES, P., & RICHMAN, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.
11. CHAMPION, A.H. (1997). Knowledge of suffixed words in reading and oral language contexts: A comparison of reading disabled and normal readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 29-55.
12. CISERO, CA., ROYER, J.M., MARCHANT, H.G., & JACKSON, S.J. (1997). Can the computer-based academic assessment system (CAAS) be used to diagnose reading disability in college students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 599-620.
13. EHRI, L.C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J.L. Metsala & L.C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. ELBRO, C., & ARNBAK, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209-240.
15. FOWLER, A.E., & LIBERMAN, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. FOWLER, C., NAPPS, S., & FELDMAN, L.B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 2-41-255.
17. FREDERIKSEN, J.R., & KROLL, J.F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 361-379.
18. LEONG, C.K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94-115.
19. MACKAY, D.G. (1976). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 61-71.
20. MAHONEY, D., SINGSON, M., & MANN, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191-218.
21. MANN, V., & SINGSON, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E.M.H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 1-25). New York: Kluwer Academic.
22. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., TYLER, L.K., WAKSLER, R., & OLDER, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
23. NAGY, W.E., & ANDERSON, R. (1984). How many words in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
24. NAGY, W.E., & ANDERSON, R., SCHOMMER, M., SCOTT, J.A., & STALLMAN, A.C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262-282.
25. NAPPS, S.E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition, 17, 729-739.
26. PERFETTI, C.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. REICHLE, E.D., & PERFETTI, C.A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219-237.
28. RUBIN, H., PATTERSON, P.A.S., & KANTOR, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2, 228-235.
29. SCHLAGAL, R.C. (1992). Patterns of orthographic development into the intermediate grades. In S. Templeton & D. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 31-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYAN, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing(pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. SCHREUDER, R., GRENDEL, M., POULISSE, N., ROELOFS, A., & VAN DE VOORT, M. (1990). Lexical processing, morphological complexity, and reading. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 125-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. SEYMOUR, P.H.K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 319-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. SINGSON, M., MAHONEY, D., & MANN, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
34. STOLTZ, J.A., & FELDMAN, L.B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. TAFT, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E.G.H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross language studies (pp. 113-137). New York: Kluwer Academic.
36. TAFT, M., & ZHU, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. TEMPLETON, S. (1989). Tacit and explicit knowledge of derivational morphology: Foundations for a unified approach to spelling and vocabulary development in the intermediate grades and beyond. Reading Psychology, 10, 233-253.
38. TEMPLETON, S., & SCARBOROUGH-FRANKS, L. (1985). The spelling's the thing: Knowledge of derivational morphology in orthography and phonology among older students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 371-390.
39. TREIMAN, R., & CASSAR, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141-170.
40. TYLER, A., & NAGY, W.E. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667.
41. TYLER, A., & NAGY, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 17-34.
42. VERHOEVEN, L., & PERFETTI, C.A. (2003). The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 209-217.
43. VERHOEVEN, L., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYAN, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 2003, 255-271.
44. WINDSOR, J. (2000). The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 50-61.
45. WYSOCKI, J.K., & JENKINS, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization, Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66-81.