Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 538-550

  Williams, Joanna P ^a   Hall, Kendra M ^a,c   Lauer, Kristen D ^a,d   Stafford, K Brooke ^a   DeSisto, Laura A ^a   DeCani, John S ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d United States Department of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

Compare contrast; Expository text; Instruction; Reading comprehension; Text structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 32844466168     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.538     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Andersen, T. H., & Armhruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 193-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
3. Baker, D. R. (1991). Textbooks and text comprehension. Science Education, 75, 359-367.
4. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
5. Bernhardt, E., Destino, T., Kamil, M., & Rodriguez-Munoz, M. (1995). Assessing science knowledge in English-Spanish bilingual elementary school. Cognosos, 4, 4-6.
6. Calfee, R. C., & Chambliss, M. J. (1988). Beyond decoding: Pictures of expository prose. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 243-257.
7. Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
8. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1989). Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding. Educational Psychologist, 24, 307-322.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Danner, F. W. (1976). Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174-183.
12. Dickson, S. (1999). Integrating reading and writing to teach compare-contrast text structure: A research-based methodology. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 49-79.
13. Dickson, S., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Text organization: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 239-277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
15. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in the first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224.
16. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and learning: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 93-105.
18. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
19. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
20. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Guthrie, J. T., & Ozgungor, S. (2002). Instructional contexts for reading engagement. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Researcher-based best practices (pp. 275-288). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Hall, J. A., Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R., & Mosteller, F. (1994). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 17-28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
24. Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (Eds.). (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25. Lauer, K. D. (2002). The effect of text structure, content familiarity, and reading ability on second-graders' comprehension of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
26. Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1995). Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 537-544.
27. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7, 7-47.
28. Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. Amercian Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-143.
29. Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141-159.
30. Meyer, B. J. F., Theodorou, E., Brezinski, K. L., Middlemiss, W., McDougall, J., & Barlett, B. J. (2002). Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 486-519.
31. Moss, B. (1997). A qualitative assessment of first graders' retelling of expository text. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 1-13.
32. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidencebased assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
33. Oyler, C., & Barry, A. (1996). Intertextual connections in read-alouds of information books. Language Arts, 73, 324-329.
34. Pappas, C. C. (1993). Is narrative "primary"? Some insights from kinder-gartners' pretend readings of stories and informational books. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 97-129.
35. Pappas, C. C., & Barry, A. (1997). Scaffolding urban students' initiations: Transactions in reading information books in the read-aloud curriculum. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in elementary classrooms: Quest and discovery (pp. 215-236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Perfetti, C. A., Marron, M. A., & Foltz, P. W. (1996). Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 137-165). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16-25.
38. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
39. Pressley, M. (2002). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
41. Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177-196.
42. Simonsen, S. (2004). Identifying and teaching text structures in content area classrooms. In D. Lapp, J. Flood, & N. Farnan (Eds.), Content area reading and learning (pp. 59-75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2002). "Oh, excellent, excellent question!": Developmental differences and comprehension acquisition. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 140-157). New York: Guilford Press.
44. Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2003). Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality, 11, 25-38.
45. Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1981). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 213-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). A synthesis of experimental intervention literature for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 271-321.
47. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). To assure the free, appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-first report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48. van den Broek, P., Lorch, E. P., & Thurlow, R. (1996). Children's and adults' memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67, 3010-3028.
49. Weaver, C. A., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 230-245). New York: Longman.
50. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
51. Wilder, A. A., & Williams, J. P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268-278.
52. Williams, J. P. (1998). Improving the comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 213-238.
53. Williams, J. P. (2001). An instructional program to teach the compare/ contrast structure: Lessons and texts: Preliminary version. Unpublished manuscript.
54. Williams, J. P. (2003). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 295-305). New York: Guilford Press.
55. Williams, J. P. (2005). An instructional program to teach the compare/ contrast structure: Lessons and texts: Final version. Unpublished manuscript.
56. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12, 129-144.
57. Williams, J. P., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., Lord, K. M., Gugga, S. S., Bak, S. J., et al. (2002). Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 235-248.
58. Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & deCani, J. S. (1984). Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1065-1075.
59. Wong, B. Y. L., & Wilson, M. (1984). Investigating awareness of and teaching passage organization in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 477-482.
60. Woodcock, R. N. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.