Intervention, evaluation, and policy studies: The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis

Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-44

  Elleman, Amy M ^a   Lindo, Endia J ^a   Morphy, Paul ^a   Compton, Donald L ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009547742     PISSN: 19345747     EISSN: 19345739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19345740802539200     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
2. Ahlfors, G. (1979). Learning word meanings: A comparison of three instructional procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
3. Anders, P. L., Bos, C. S., & Filip, D. (1984). The effect of semantic feature analysis on the reading comprehension of learning-disabled students. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 162-166). Rochester, NY: The National Reading Conference.
4. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Apthorp, H. S. (2006). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program in third-grade reading/language arts. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 67-79.
6. Armstrong, J. C. (2000). The integration of reading vocabulary techniques with scientific terminology in a sixth-grade classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
7. Askov, E. N., & Kamm, K. (1976). Context clues: Should we teach children to use a classification system in reading? Journal of Educational Research, 69, 341-344.
8. Barrett, M. T., & Graves, M. F. (1981). A vocabulary program for junior high school remedial readers. Journal of Reading, 25(2), 146-150.
9. Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 150-178.
10. Baumann, J. F., Kame’enui, E. J.,&Ash, G. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of reading research on teaching the English Language Arts (2nd ed., pp. 752-785). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107(3), 251-270.
12. Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A.,&McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506-521.
13. Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In A. Hiebert & M. Kamil, (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223-242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Blevins, M. L. (1970). A comparative study of three methods of instructions in vocabulary on achievement of students in the Adult Institute. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
15. Block, C. C., & Mangieri, J. (2006). The effects of Powerful Vocabulary for Reading Success on students’ reading vocabulary and comprehension achievement. New York: Scholastic Inc. Retrieved May 1, 2007, from http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/fluencyformula/ pdfs/ PowerfulVocab Efficacy.pdf
16. Boettcher, J. V. (1983). Computer-based education: Classroom application and benefits for the learning-disabled student. Annals of Dyslexia, 33, 203-219.
17. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31-42.
18. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1992). Using interactive teaching and learning strategies to promote text comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39(3), 225-238.
19. Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 384-390.
20. Brabham, E. G., & Lynch-Brown, C. (2002). Effects of teachers’ reading aloud styles on vocabulary acquisition and comprehension of students in the early elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 465-473.
21. Bryant, P. D., Goodwin, M., Bryant, B. R.,&Higgins, K. (2003). Vocabulary instruction for studentswith learning disabilities:Areviewof the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 117-129.
22. Carney, J. J., Anderson, D., Blackburn, C., & Blessing, D. (1984). Preteaching vocabulary and the comprehension of social studies materials by elementary school children. Social Education, 48(3), 195-196.
23. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101-129.
25. Cortina, J. M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA designs (Vol. 129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Coyne, M., Zipoli, R., Jr., Loftus, S.,&Kapp, S. (2007). Direct vocabulary intervention in kindergarten: Investigating transfer effects. Paper presented at the Institute of Education Sciences Research Conference, Washington, DC.
27. Davis, F. B. (1942). Two measures of reading ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 365-372.
28. Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499-545.
29. Dole, J. A., Sloan, C., & Trathen, W. (1995). Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature. Journal of Reading, 38, 452-460.
30. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 170-177.
31. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463.
32. Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1983). Effects of text comprehension of differing proportions and locations of difficult vocabulary. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 19-39.
33. Fukkink, R. G.,&deGlopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving wordmeaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450-469.
34. Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading:Acomparison ofwords found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25, 1-37.
35. Gipe, J. (1979). Investigating the techniques for teaching word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 277-294.
36. Graesser, A., Golding, J. M., & Long, D. L. (1991). Narrative representation and comprehension. In D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 171-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hafner, L. E. (1965). A one-month experiment in teaching context aids in fifth grade. Journal of Educational Research, 58(10), 472-474.
38. Hayes, D. P., & Ahrens, M. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case for "motherese"? Journal of Child Language, 15, 395-410.
39. Hedges, L.V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 490-499.
40. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, D. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analyses. San Diego, CA: Academic.
41. Hogan, F. P. (1961). Comparison of two methods of teaching word meaning through the use of word parts in grades ten, eleven and twelve. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
42. Hoisington, A. L. (1968). An experimental investigation of a linguistic approach to vocabulary development which emphasizes structural analysis: Prefixes, suffixes and root words. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Spokane.
43. Jackson, J. R., & Dizney, H. (1963). Intensive vocabulary training. Journal of Developmental Reading, 6, 221-229.
44. Jones, S. T. (1984). The effects of semantic mapping on vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension of black inner city students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin, Madison.
45. Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L. L., Sacks, G.,&Jacobson, L. A. (2004). What research says about vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 299-323.
46. Kameenui, E., Carnine, D., & Freschi, R. (1982). Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 367-388.
47. Kimer-Simon, K. L. (2003). Storybook activities for improving language: Effects on language and literacy outcomes in Head Start preschool classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
48. Klesius, J. P., & Searls, E. F. (1990). A meta-analysis of recent research in meaning vocabulary instruction. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 226.
49. Kux-Cox, J. A. (1974). A comparison of two instructional methods utilizing the cloze procedure and a more traditional method for improving reading comprehension and vocabulary in context in a disadvantaged fourth-grade elementary school sample. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.
50. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: Reading, 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
51. Lieberman, J. E. (1965). The effect of direct instruction in vocabulary concepts on reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
52. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Lubliner, S. (2002). The power of clarifying: A comparative analysis of strategies that strengthen comprehension. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
54. Margosein, C. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1982). The effects of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. Journal of Early Adolescence, 2(2), 185-194.
55. Marks, C. B., Doctorow, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Word frequency and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 259-262.
56. Marmolejo, A. (1990). The effects of vocabulary instruction with poor readers: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University Teachers College, New York.
57. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Fulk, B. M. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92-96.
58. McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2006). Issues in the advancement of vocabulary instruction: Response to Stahl and Fairbank’s meta-analysis. In K. A. Dougherty-Stahl&M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 262-271). New York: Guilford.
59. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension:Areplication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(1), 3-18.
60. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Pople, M. T. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 522-535.
61. McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 465-482.
62. Medo, M., & Ryder, R. J. (1993). The effects of vocabulary instruction on reader’s ability to make causal connections. Reading Research and Instruction, 33(2), 119-134.
63. Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53, 253-279.
64. Nagy, W. (2005).Why vocabulary instruction needs to be long-term and comprehensive. In E. H. Hiebert&M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Nash, H., & Snowling, M. (2006). Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(3), 335-354.
66. National Institutes of Children’sHealth andDevelopment. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching students to read: An evidenced-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
67. Otterman, I. M. (1955). The value of teaching prefixes and word-roots. Journal of Educational Research, 48, 611-616.
68. Pace, R. E. (1986). A comparison of two methods of teaching fifth grade science vocabulary: An imagery method and a traditional science textbook method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
69. Pany, D., & Jenkins, J. R. (1978). Learning word meanings: A comparison of instructional procedures. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 21-32.
70. Pany, D., Jenkins, J. R., & Schreck, J. (1982). Vocabulary Instruction: Effects on Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(3), 202-215.
71. Paris, S. G., & Stahl, S. A. (Eds.). (2005). Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282-296.
73. Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Petty, W. T., Herold, C. P., & Stoll, E. (1968). The state of knowledge about the teaching of vocabulary. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
75. Puhalla, E. M. (2005). Teaching vocabulary from narrative and information text: Examining the effects of instructional intensity and judicious review on the vocabulary and expressive language performance of first-grade children at-risk of early reading difficulties. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem.
76. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effect models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301-322). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
77. Reinking, D., & Rickman, S. S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(4), 395-406.
78. Roser, N., & Juel, C. (1982). Effects of vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension. In J. S. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries into reading research. Thirty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference. (pp. 110-118). Albany, NY: National Reading Conference.
79. Ruetzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1988). Highlighting key vocabulary: A generative-reciprocal procedure for teaching selected inference types. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 358-378.
80. Sampson, M. R., Valmont, W. J., & VanAllen, R. (1982). The effects of instructional cloze on the comprehension, vocabulary, and divergent production of third-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 389-399.
81. Schachter, S. W. (1978). An investigation of the effects of vocabulary instruction and schemata orientation upon reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
82. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-284). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
83. Shadish, W. R., Robinson, L., & Congxiao, L. (1999). ES: A computer program for effect size calculation. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis.
84. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
85. Spearitt, D. (1972). Identification of sub-skills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 92-111.
86. Stahl, S. (1983). Differential word knowledge and reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 33-47.
87. Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72-110.
88. Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences for the individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
90. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211-229.
91. Sternberg, R. J., & Powell, J. S. (1983). Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist, 38(8), 878-893.
92. Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(10), 1046-1055.
93. Thames, D. G. (1986). Effects of prereading vocabulary strategies on vocabulary and comprehension of basal stories by primary children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
94. Thomas, C. L. (1998). The effects of three levels of curricular modifications on the vocabulary knowledge and comprehension of regular education students and students with learning disabilities in content-area classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
95. Tuinman, J. J., & Brady, M. E. (1974). How does vocabulary variance account for variance on reading comprehension tests? A preliminary instructional analysis. In P. Nacke (Ed.), Twenty-third national reading conference yearbook (pp. 176-184). Clemson, SC: The National Reading Conference.
96. Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
97. van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J., Butler, J., White, M. J., et al. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107-129). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. What Works Clearinghouse. (2007). Technical details of WWC-conducted computations. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://www.whatworks.ed.gov/reviewprocess /conducted computations.pdf
99. Wittrock, M. C., Marks, C., & Doctorow, M. (1975). Reading as a generative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 484-489.
100. Wixson, K. K. (1986). Vocabulary instruction and children’s comprehension of basal stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(3), 317-329.
101. Wolfe, M. (2005). Memory for narrative and expository text: Independent influences of semantic associations and text organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 359-364.