Biomedical applications of soy protein: A brief overview

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 553-569

  Tansaz, Samira ^a   Boccaccini, Aldo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

drug delivery systems; plant derived protein; soy protein isolate; tissue engineering; wound dressing

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; BIOMECHANICS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NATURAL POLYMERS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; DIFFERENT SHAPES; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; INORGANIC MATERIALS; PROCESSING METHOD; SOY PROTEIN ISOLATES; WOUND DRESSINGS;

PROTEINS;

BIOMATERIAL; BONE CEMENT; SOYBEAN PROTEIN; BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC;

BIOFILM; BIOMEDICINE; BONE FILLER; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; FIBER; FILM; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MEDICAL DEVICE; NONHUMAN; POROUS SCAFFOLD; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX;

ANIMALS; BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; SOYBEAN PROTEINS;

EID: 84955215966     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35569     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Reddy N, Yang Y., Potential of plant proteins for medical applications. Trends Biotechnol 2011; 29: 490-8. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167779911000928
2. Reddy N, Yang Y., Soyprotein fibers with high strength and water stability for potential medical applications. Biotechnol Prog 2009; 25: 1796-1802. [cited 2014 Feb 19]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637391
3. Vaz CM, de Graaf LA, Reis RL, Cunha AM,. Soy protein-based systems for different tissue regeneration applications. Polym Based Syst Tissue Eng Replace Regen. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2002; 93-110. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-010-0305-6-7
4. Murphy AR, Kaplan DL., Biomedical applications of chemically-modified silk fibroin. J Mater Chem. 2009; 19: 6443. Available at: http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=b905802h
5. Lee CH, Singla A, Lee Y., Biomedical applications of collagen. Int J Pharm 2001; 221: 1-22. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378517301006913
6. Baslé E, Joubert N, Pucheault M., Protein chemical modification on endogenous amino acids. Chem Biol. 2010; 17: 213-27. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1074552110000773
7. Chalker JM, Bernardes GJL, Lin YA, Davis BG., Chemical modification of proteins at cysteine: Opportunities in chemistry and biology. Chem Asian J 2009; 4: 630-40. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asia.200800427
8. Santin M, Ambrosio L., Soybean-based biomaterials: Preparation, properties and tissue regeneration potential. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5: 349-358. Available at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1586/17434440.5.3.349
9. Cooperman L, Michaeli D,. The immunogenicity of injectable collagen. I. A 1-year prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 638-646. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190962284802716
10. Keefe J, Wauk L, Chu S, DeLustro F., Clinical use of injectable bovine collagen-A decade of experience. Clin Mater 1992; 9: 155-162. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/026766059290095B
11. Cooperman L, Michaeli D, Alto P, Francisco S, Corporation C, Corpora- C., The immunogenicity of injectable collagen. II. A retrospective review of seventy-two tested and treated patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 10: 647-651.
12. DeLustro F, Condell Ra, Nguyen Ma, McPherson JM., A comparative study of the biologic and immunologic response to medical devices derived from dermal collagen. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986; 20: 109-120. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3949821
13. Peng YY, Glattauer V, Ramshaw JaM, Werkmeister Ja., Evaluation of the immunogenicity and cell compatibility of avian collagen for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93: 1235-1244. [cited 2014 Jun 16]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19777573
14. Reddy N, Jiang Q, Yang Y., Novel wheat protein films as substrates for tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2011; 22: 2063-2077. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1163/092050610X532638
15. Elli L, Dolfini E, Bardella MT., Gliadin cytotoxicity and in vitro cell cultures. Toxicol Lett 2003; 146: 1-8. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378427403003436
16. Hurtado-Lõpez P, Murdan S., An investigation into the adjuvanticity and immunogenicity of zein microspheres being researched as drug and vaccine carriers. J Pharm Pharmacol 2006; 58: 769-774. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1211/jpp.58.6.0007
17. Reddy N, Yang Y., Novel protein fibers from wheat gluten. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 638-643. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bm0608840
18. Dong J, Sun Q, Wang JY., Basic study of corn protein, zein, as a biomaterial in tissue engineering, surface morphology and biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4691-4697. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961203010263
19. Liu X, Sun Q, Wang H, Zhang L, Wang JY., Microspheres of corn protein, zein, for an ivermectin drug delivery system. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 109-115. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961204001516
20. Duclairoir C, Orecchioni A-M, Depraetere P, Osterstock F, Nakache E., Evaluation of gliadins nanoparticles as drug delivery systems: A study of three different drugs. Int J Pharm 2003; 253: 133-144. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378517302007019
21. Ramnath V, Sekar S, Sankar S, Sankaranarayanan C, Sastry TP., Preparation and evaluation of biocomposites as wound dressing material. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 3083-3095. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10856-012-4765-5
22. Hurtado-Lõpez P, Murdan S., Zein microspheres as drug/antigen carriers: A study of their degradation and erosion, in the presence and absence of enzymes. J Microencapsul 2006; 23: 303-314. [cited 2014 Jul 30]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16801242
23. Wang HJ, Lin ZX, Liu XM, Sheng SY, Wang JY., Heparin-loaded zein microsphere film and hemocompatibility. J Control Release 2005; 105: 120-131. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168365905001367
24. Wang H-J, Fu J-X, Wang J-Y., Effect of water vapor on the surface characteristics and cell compatibility of zein films. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009; 69: 109-115. [cited 2014 May 12]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19117737
25. Jiang Q, Yang Y., Water-stable electrospun zein fibers for potential drug delivery. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011; 22: 1393-408. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1163/092050610X508437
26. Wang HJ, Gong SJ, Lin ZX, Fu JX, Xue ST, Huang JC, Wang JY., In vivo biocompatibility and mechanical properties of porous zein scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3952-3964. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961207004164
27. Curt S, Subirade M, Rouabhia M., Production and in vitro evaluation of soy protein-based biofilms as a support for human keratinocyte and fibroblast culture. Tissue Eng A 2009; 15: 1223-1232. Available at: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0157
28. Santin M, Morris C, Standen G, Nicolais L, Ambrosio L., A new class of bioactive and biodegradable soybean-based bone fillers. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 2706-2711. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bm0703362
29. Peles Z, Binderman I., Soy protein films for wound-healing applications: Antibiotic release, bacterial inhibition and cellular response. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012; 7: 401-412. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com /doi/ 10.1002/term.536/full \n http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22411912
30. Ivanov, Dušica S., Jovanka D. Levic, and Slavica A. Sredanovic. Fatty acid composition of various soybean products. Food and Feed Res 2010; 2: 65-70.
31. Singh P, Kumar R, Sabapathy SN, Bawa aS., Functional and edible uses of soy protein products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2008; 7: 14-28. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00025.x
32. Zhong Z, Sun XS., Properties of soy protein isolate/polycaprolactone blends compatibilized by methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. Polymer 2001; 42: 6961-6969. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032386101001185
33. Silva GA, Vaz CM, Coutinho OP, Cunha AM, Reis RL., In vitro degradation and cytocompatibility evaluation of novel soy and sodium caseinate-based membrane biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 1055-1066. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15348498
34. Lin L, Perets A, Har-El Y-E, Varma D, Li M, Lazarovici P, Woerdeman DL, Lelkes PI., Alimentary "green" proteins as electrospun scaffolds for skin regenerative engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012; 9: 8-9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22499248
35. Hofland GW, De Rijke A, Thiering R, Van Der Wielen LAM, Witkamp GJ., Isoelectric precipitation of soybean protein using carbon dioxide as a volatile acid. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000; 743: 357-368. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378434700002590
36. Cho D, Nnadi O, Netravali A, Joo YL., Electrospun hybrid soy protein/PVA fibers. Macromol Mater Eng 2010; 295: 763-73. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/mame.201000161
37. Ramji K, Shah RN., Electrospun soy protein nanofiber scaffolds for tissue regeneration. J Biomater Appl. 2014; 29: 411-422. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710281
38. Tian K, Shao Z, Chen X., Natural electroactive hydrogel from soy protein isolation. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11: 3638-43. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21086983
39. German B, Damodaran S, Kinsella JE., Thermal dissociation and association behavior of soy proteins. J Agric Food Chem 1982; 30: 807-811. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf00113a002
40. Shankar A, Seyam AM, Hudson SM., Electrospinning of soy protein fibers and their compatibility with synthetic polymers. JTATM 2013; 8: 1-14.
41. González A, Alvarez Igarzabal CI., Soy protein-Poly (lactic acid) bilayer films as biodegradable material for active food packaging. Food Hydrocoll 2013; 33: 289-296. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0268005X13000933
42. Zhang J, Jiang L, Zhu L, Jane J-L, Mungara P., Morphology and properties of soy protein and polylactide blends. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7: 1551-1561. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bm050888p
43. Eyler A, Wang Y, Liu T, Li B, Zhong W-H., Ion-induced effective control of morphologies of soy protein biocomposites. J Mater Sci 2015; 50: 2691-2699. [cited 2015 Apr 8]. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10853-015-8816-4
44. Li Y, Chen F, Zhang L, Yao Y., Effect of surface changes of soy protein materials on water resistance. Mater Lett 2015; 149: 120-122. [cited 2015 May 12]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167577X15002207
45. Chien KB, Aguado Ba, Bryce PJ, Shah RN., In vivo acute and humoral response to three-dimensional porous soy protein scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 8983-8990. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23851173
46. Were L, Hettiarachchy NS, Coleman M., Properties of cysteine-added soy protein-wheat gluten films. J Food Sci 1999; 64: 514-518. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15074.x
47. Silva R, Bulut B, Roether J A., Kaschta J, Schubert DW, Boccaccini AR., Sonochemical processing and characterization of composite materials based on soy protein and alginate containing micron-sized bioactive glass particles. J Mol Struct; Elsevier B.V.; 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 16]; 1073: 87-96. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022286014005468
48. Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Margolis DJ, Pecoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, Robson MC., Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 489-93. Available at: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archderm.1994.01690040093015
49. Percival NJ., Classification of Wounds and their Management. Surgery 2002; 20: 114-7. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263931906702277
50. Harding KG, Morris HL, Patel GK., Healing chronic wounds. Br Med J 2002; 324: 160-163. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11799036 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC1122073
51. Gholamrezanezhad A, editor. Stem Cells in Clinic and Research InTech; Aug 23, 2011. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/stem-cells-in-clinic-and-research
52. Martin P., Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997; 276: 75-81. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.276.5309.75
53. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG., Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 244-269. Available at: http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001
54. Kokabi M, Sirousazar M, Hassan ZM., PVA-clay nanocomposite hydrogels for wound dressing. Eur Polym J 2007; 43: 773-81. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0014305706004265
55. Torres FG, Commeaux S, Troncoso OP., Starch-Based Biomaterials for wound-Dressing Applications. Starch-Stärke. 2013; 543-551. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/star.201200259
56. Auchincloss H, Sachs DH., Xenogeneic transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol 1998; 16: 433-470. Available at: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.433
57. Pham C, Greenwood J, Cleland H, Woodruff P, Maddern G., Bioengineered skin substitutes for the management of burns: A systematic review. Burns 2007; 33: 946-57. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305417907001040
58. Paul W, Sharma CP., Chitosan and alginate wound dressings: A short review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2004; 18: 18-23.
59. Mogoşanu GD, Grumezescu AM., Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm 2014; 463: 127-136. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368109
60. Shingel KI, Di Stabile L, Marty J-P, Faure M-P., Inflammatory inert poly(ethylene glycol)-protein wound dressing improves healing responses in partial- and full-thickness wounds. Int Wound J 2006; 3: 332-342. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00262.x
61. Park E, Lee SM, Jung I-K, Lim Y, Kim J-H., Effects of genistein on early-stage cutaneous wound healing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 410: 514-519. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X11009715
62. Regal JF, Fraser DG, Weeks CE, Greenberg NA., Dietary phytoestrogens have anti-inflammatory activity in a guinea pig model of asthma. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 2000; 223: 372-378. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10721007
63. Emmerson E, Campbell L, Ashcroft GS, Hardman MJ., The phytoestrogen genistein promotes wound healing by multiple independent mechanisms. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 321: 184-193. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0303720710001164
64. Peterson G, Barnes S., Genistein inhibits both estrogen and growth factor-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cell Growth Differ 1996; 7: 1345-1351. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8891338
65. Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF., Edible films and coatings from soy protein. J Food Sci 1993; 58: 1086-1089. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb06120.x
66. Kokoszka S, Debeaufort F, Hambleton A, Lenart A, Voilley A., Protein and glycerol contents affect physico-chemical properties of soy protein isolate-based edible films. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 2010; 11: 503-10. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856410000081
67. Cho SY, Rhee C., Sorption characteristics of soy protein films and their relation to mechanical properties. Food Sci Technol 2002; 35: 151-157. [cited 2014 Jul 15]. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643801908291
68. Schmidt V, Giacomelli C, Soldi MS, Soldi V., Soy protein isolate based films: influence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and polycaprolactone-triol on their properties. Macromol Symp 2005; 229: 127-137. [cited 2014 Apr 16]. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/masy.200551115
69. Ma L, Yang Y, Yao J, Shao Z, Chen X., Robust soy protein films obtained by slight chemical modification of polypeptide chains. Polym Chem 2013; 4: 5425-5431. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1039/C3PY00557G
70. Ramnath V, Sastry P., In vivo evaluation of composite wound dressing material containing soya protein and sago starch. Int J Pharm Pharm L Sci 2012; 4: 414-9.
71. Vaz CM, De GL, a, Reis RL, Cunha AM., Effect of crosslinking, thermal treatment and UV irradiation on the mechanical properties and in vitro degradation behavior of several natural proteins aimed to be used in the biomedical field. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 789-796. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15348399
72. Silva SS, Santos MI, Coutinho OP, Mano JF, Reis RL., Physical properties and biocompatibility of chitosan/soy blended membranes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 575-579. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10856-005-0534-z
73. Silva SS, Goodfellow BJ, Benesch J, Rocha J, Mano JF, Reis RL., Morphology and miscibility of chitosan/soy protein blended membranes. Carbohydr Polym 2007; 70: 25-31. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0144861707001312
74. Vaz CM, de Graaf LA, Reis RL, Cunha AM., In vitro degradation behaviour of biodegradable soy plastics: effects of crosslinking with glyoxal and thermal treatment. Polym Degrad Stab 2003; 81: 65-74. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141391003000636
75. Soliman EA, Tawfik MS, El-Sayed H, Moharram YG., Preparation and characterization of soy protein based edible/biodegradable films. Am J Food Technol. 2007; 2: 462-476. Available at: http://www.scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajft.2007.462.476
76. Santos TC, Hoering B, Reise K, Marques A, Silva SS, Oliveira JM, Mano J, Castro AG, Reis RL, van Griensven M., In vivo performance of chitosan/soy-based membranes as wound dressing devices for acute skin wounds. Tissue Eng Part A 2013; 19: 860-9. Available at: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0651
77. Santos TC, Marques AP, Silva SS, Oliveira JM, Mano JF, Castro AG, van Griensven M, Reis RL., Chitosan improves the biological performance of soy-based biomaterials. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 2883-2890. Available at: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0114
78. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W., Wound bed preparation: A systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 2003; 11: S1-28. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1524-475X.11.s2.1.x
79. Field CK, Kerstein MD., Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 1994; 167: S2-6. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0002961094900027
80. Moody A., Use of a hydrogel dressing for management of a painful leg ulcer. Br J Community Nurs. 2006; 11: S12-S17. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16835565
81. Higa OZ, Rogero SO, Machado LDB, Mathor MB, Lugão AB., Biocompatibility study for PVP wound dressing obtained in different conditions. Radiat Phys Chem 1999; 55: 705-7. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969806X99002157
82. Chien KB, Chung EJ, Shah RN., Investigation of soy protein hydrogels for biomedical applications: Materials characterization, drug release, and biocompatibility. J Biomater Appl. 2014; 28: 1085-1096. Available at: http://jba.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0885328213497413
83. Snyders R, Shingel KI, Zabeida O, Roberge C, Faure M-P, Martinu L, Klemberg-Sapieha JE., Mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid poly(ethylene glycol)-soy protein hydrogels for wound dressing applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 83: 88-97. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jbm.a.31217
84. Meikle ST, Standen G, Salvage J, Santis De, Nicolais R, Ambrosio L, Santin LM., Synthesis and characterization of soybean-based hydrogels with an intrinsic activity on cell differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A 2012; 18: 1932-9. Available at: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0549
85. Thirugnanaselvam M, Gobi N, Arun Karthick S., SPI/PEO blended electrospun martrix for wound healing. Fibers Polym 2013; 14: 965-969. [cited 2014 Jul 16]. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12221-013-0965-y
86. Wang Q, Du Y, Hu X, Yang J, Fan L, Feng T., Preparation of alginate/soy protein isolate blend fibers through a novel coagulating bath. J Appl Polym Sci 2006; 101: 425-431. [cited 2015 Mar 11]. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/app.22369
87. Zhang Y, Lee MW, An S, Sinha-Ray S, Khansari S, Joshi B, Hong S, Hong JH, Kim JJ, Pourdeyhimi B, Yoon SS, Yarin AL., Antibacterial activity of photocatalytic electrospun titania nanofiber mats and solution-blown soy protein nanofiber mats decorated with silver nanoparticles. Catal Commun. 2013; 34: 35-40. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1566736713000034
88. Har-el Y, el Gerstenhaber JA, Brodsky R, Huneke RB, Lelkes PI., Electrospun soy protein scaffolds as wound dressings: Enhanced reepithelialization in a porcine model of wound healing. Wound Med 2014; 5: 9-15. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221390951400024X
89. O'Brien FJ., Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 2011. [cited 2014 Jul 10];14:88-95. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136970211170058X
90. Chien KB, Shah RN., Novel soy protein scaffolds for tissue regeneration: Material characterization and interaction with human mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 694-703. [cited 2015 Apr 16]. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706111004296
91. Lee Ha, Choi SJ, Moon TW., Characteristics of sodium caseinate- and soy protein isolate-stabilized emulsion-gels formed by microbial transglutaminase. J Food Sci 2006; 71: C352-C357. [cited 2015 Mar 11]. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00110.x
92. Tang CH, Chen Z, Li L, Yang XQ., Effects of transglutaminase treatment on the thermal properties of soy protein isolates. Food Res Int 2006; 39: 704-711. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996906000111
93. Jiang Y, Tang C-H, Wen Q-B, Li L, Yang X-Q., Effect of processing parameters on the properties of transglutaminase-treated soy protein isolate films. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 2007; 8: 218-225. [cited 2015 Mar 11]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856406000841
94. Tang CH, Jiang Y, Wen QB, Yang XQ., Effect of transglutaminase treatment on the properties of cast films of soy protein isolates. J Biotechnol 2005; 120: 296-307. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168165605003305
95. Tang CH, Wu H, Chen Z, Yang XQ., Formation and properties of glycinin-rich and β-conglycinin-rich soy protein isolate gels induced by microbial transglutaminase-conglycinin-rich soy protein isolate gels induced by microbial transglutaminase. Food Res Int 2006; 39: 87-97. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996905001432
96. Chien KB, Makridakis E, Shah RN., Three-dimensional printing of soy protein scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2013; 19: 417-426. [cited 2015 Mar 16]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102234
97. Silva SS, Oliveira JM, Mano JF, Reis RL., Physicochemical characterization of novel chitosan-soy protein/TEOS porous hybrids for tissue engineering applications. Adv Mater Forum III 2006; 514-516. 1000-4. Available at: ://000238056400199
98. Kokubo T., Apatite formation on surfaces of ceramics, metals and polymers in body environment. Acta Mater. 1998; 46: 2519-27. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359645498800360
99. Rodrigues MT, Leonor IB, Gröen N, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Caridade SG, Mano JF, Gomes ME, Reis RL., Bone marrow stromal cells on a three-dimensional bioactive fiber mesh undergo osteogenic differentiation in the absence of osteogenic media supplements: the effect of silanol groups. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 4175-4185. [cited 2015 Mar 16]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24905935
100. Luo L-H, Wang X-M, Zhang Y-F, Liu Y-M, Chang PR, Wang Y, Chen Y., Physical properties and biocompatibility of cellulose/soy protein isolate membranes coagulated from acetic aqueous solution. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2008; 19: 479-496. [cited 2015 May 4]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18318960
101. Luo L-H, Zhang Y-F, Wang X-M, Wan Y, Chang PR, Anderson DP, Chen Y., Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of cellulose/soy protein isolate composite sponges. J Biomater Appl. 2010; 24: 503-526. Available at: http://jba.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0885328208099337
102. Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR., Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: Emerging applications in contact with soft tissues. Acta Biomater 2014; 13: 1-15. [cited 2014 Dec 13]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706114004966
103. Smith LA, Ma PX., Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2004; 39: 125-131. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927776503003035
104. Xu H, Cai S, Sellers A, Yang Y., Intrinsically water-stable electrospun three-dimensional ultrafine fibrous soy protein scaffolds for soft tissue engineering using adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells. RSC Adv 2014; 4: 15451 [cited 2015 Mar 16]. Available at: http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c3ra47547f
105. Li M, Guo Y, Wei Y, MacDiarmid AG, Lelkes PI., Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2705-2715. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961205010628
106. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK., Electrospun nanofibrous structure: A novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60: 613-621. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jbm.10167
107. Nayak P., synthesis and characterization of soy protein isolate/MMT nanocomposite film for the control release of the drug ofloxacin. World J Nano Sci Eng 2011; 01: 27-36. [cited 2014 Feb 19]. Available at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?DOI=10.4236/wjnse.2011.12005
108. Silva R, Ferreira H, Cavaco-Paulo A., Sonoproduction of liposomes and protein particles as templates for delivery purposes. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12: 3353-68. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bm200658b
109. Lohcharoenkal W, Wang L, Chen YC, Rojanasakul Y., Protein nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 1-12. Available at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/180549/
110. Chen L, Remondetto G, Rouabhia M, Subirade M., Kinetics of the breakdown of cross-linked soy protein films for drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2008; 29: 3750-3756. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961208003839
111. MaHam A, Tang Z, Wu H, Wang J, Lin Y., Protein-based nanomedicine platforms for drug delivery. Small. 2009; 5: 1706-21. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/smll.200801602
112. Teng Z, Luo Y, Wang T, Zhang B, Wang Q., Development and application of nanoparticles synthesized with folic acid conjugated soy protein. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61: 2556-64. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf4001567
113. Teng Z, Luo Y, Wang Q., Nanoparticles synthesized from soy protein: Preparation, characterization, and application for nutraceutical encapsulation. J Agric Food Chem 2012; 60: 2712-2720. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf205238x
114. Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM., Nanoparticle therapeutics: An emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008; 7: 771-782. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nrd2614
115. Chen L, Subirade M., Elaboration and characterization of soy/zein protein microspheres for controlled nutraceutical delivery. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10: 3327-3334. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bm900989y
116. Chen L, Hébrard G, Beyssac E, Denis S, Subirade M., In vitro study of the release properties of soy-zein protein microspheres with a dynamic artificial digestive system. J Agric Food Chem 2010; 58: 9861-9867. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf101918w
117. Zheng H, Zhou Z, Chen Y, Huang J, Xiong F., pH-sensitive alginate/soy protein microspheres as drug transporter. J Appl Polym Sci 2007; 106: 1034-1041. [cited 2015 Mar 16]. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/app.26725
118. Ding X, Yao P., Soy protein/soy polysaccharide complex nanogels: Folic acid loading, protection, and controlled delivery. Langmuir 2013; 29: 8636-8644. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la401664y
119. Xu W, Yang Y., Drug sorption onto and release from soy protein fibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 2477-2486. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10856-009-3821-2
120. Molina E, Ledward D., Effects of combined high-pressure and heat treatment on the textural properties of soya gels. Food Chem 2003; 80: 367-370. [cited 2015 May 4]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814602002741
121. Song F, Zhang L-M., Gelation modification of soy protein isolate by a naturally occurring cross-linking agent and its potential biomedical application. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009; 48: 7077-7083. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie801372f
122. Vaz CM, van Doeveren PFNM, Reis RL, Cunha AM., Soy matrix drug delivery systems obtained by melt-processing techniques. Biomacromolecules 2003; 4: 1520-1529. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14606876
123. Vaz CM, deGraaf LA, Reis RL., and CAM. pH-sensitive soy protein films for the controlled release of an anti inflammatory drug. J.Materials Research Innovations 2004; 8 (3). Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20747
124. Vaz CM, van Doeveren P, Reis RL, Cunha AM., Development and design of double-layer co-injection moulded soy protein based drug delivery devices. Polymer 2003; 44: 5983-5992. Available at: ://000185182500060\nhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?-ob=MImg&-imagekey=B6TXW-49326D3-H-1&-cdi=5601&-user=2459786&
125. González A, Tártara LI, Palma SD, Alvarez Igarzabal CI., Crosslinked soy protein films and their application as ophthalmic drug delivery system. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015; 51: 73-79. [cited 2015 May 27]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092849311500168X
126. Liu Y, Cui Y, Yin G, Ma H., Synthesis, characterization, and drug release behaviour of novel soy protein/poly (acrylic acid) IPN hydrogels. Iran Polym J 2009; 18: 339-348.
127. Liu Y, Cui Y., Thermosensitive soy protein/poly (n -isopropylacrylamide) interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels for drug controlled release. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 120: 3613-3620. [cited 2015 Jul 6]. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/app.33535
128. Kobayashi M, Nakamura T, Okada Y, Fukumoto A, Furukawa T, Kato H, Kokubo T, Kikutani T., Bioactive bone cement: comparison of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic, hydroxyapatite, and beta-tricalcium phosphate fillers on bone-bonding strength. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 223-237. [cited 2015 Mar 16]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9773818
129. Schepers E, de Clercq M, Ducheyne P, Kempeneers R., Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 439-452. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb01689.x
130. Erbe E, Marx J, Clineff T, Bellincampi L., Potential of an ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic cancellous bone void filler and bone marrow aspirate composite graft. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: S141-6. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s005860100287
131. Sotome S, Uemura T, Kikuchi M, Chen J, Itoh S, Tanaka J, Tateishi T, Shinomiya K., Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of a novel hydroxyapatite/collagen-alginate as a bone filler and a drug delivery carrier of bone morphogenetic protein. Mater Sci Eng C. 2004; 24: 341-7. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0928493103003011
132. Wang Q, Wang J, Lu Q, Detamore MS, Berkland C., Injectable PLGA based colloidal gels for zero-order dexamethasone release in cranial defects. Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 4980-4986. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014296121000298X
133. Liao S, Wang W, Uo M, Ohkawa S, Akasaka T, Tamura K, Cui F, Watari F., A three-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 7564-7571. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961205004199
134. LeGeros RZ., Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 81-98. Available at: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00003086-200202000-00009
135. Salvage J, Thorpe J, Santin M., Soybean-based biomaterial granules induce biomineralization in MG-63 human osteosarcoma osteoblast-like cells through ultrastructural changes and phagocytic activity. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26: 122 [cited 2015 May 13]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690618
136. Giavaresi G, Fini M, Salvage J, Nicoli Aldini N, Giardino R, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L, Santin M., Bone regeneration potential of a soybean-based filler: experimental study in a rabbit cancellous bone defects. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 615-626. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10856-009-3870-6
137. Merolli A, Nicolais L, Ambrosio L, Santin M., A degradable soybean-based biomaterial used effectively as a bone filler in vivo in a rabbit. Biomed Mater 2010; 5: 15008 [cited 2014 May 19]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20124667
138. Vaz CM, Fossen M, van Tuil RF, de Graaf LA, Reis RL, Cunha AM., Casein and soybean protein-based thermoplastics and composites as alternative biodegradable polymers for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 65: 60-70. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jbm.a.10416
139. Kovtun A, Goeckelmann MJ, Niclas AA, Montufar EB, Ginebra M-P, Planell JA, Santin M, Ignatius A., In vivo performance of novel soybean/gelatin-based bioactive and injectable hydroxyapatite foams. Acta Biomater 2015; 12: 242-249. [cited 2015 Jan 16]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706114004851
140. Perut F, Montufar EB, Ciapetti G, Santin M, Salvage J, Traykova T, Planell JA, Ginebra MP, Baldini N., Novel soybean/gelatine-based bioactive and injectable hydroxyapatite foam: Material properties and cell response. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 1780-7. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706110005635
141. Chen Y, Zhang L, Gu J, Liu J., Physical properties of microporous membranes prepared by hydrolyzing cellulose/soy protein blends. J Memb Sci 2004; 241: 393-402. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738804004181
142. Zhu Y, Douglass E, Theyson T, Hogan R, Kotek R., Cellulose and soy proteins based membrane networks. Macromol Symp 2013; 329: 70-86. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/masy.201300032
143. Barkay-Olami H, Zilberman M,. Novel porous soy protein-based blend structures for biomedical applications: Microstructure, mechanical, and physical properties. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2015. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jbm.b.33459