Soy protein films for wound-healing applications: Antibiotic release, bacterial inhibition and cellular response

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 401-412

  Peles, Zachi ^a   Binderman, Itzhak ^a   Berdicevsky, Israela ^b   Zilberman, Meital ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bacterial inhibition; Biocompatibility; Controlled drug delivery; Gentamicin; Soy protein films

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTICS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; FILMS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PROTEINS; SOLUTIONS; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY;

ANTIBIOTIC RELEASE; BACTERIAL INHIBITION; GENTAMICIN; MATRIX; PROTEIN FILMS; SOY PROTEIN; SOY PROTEIN FILM; SOY PROTEIN ISOLATES; WOUND DRESSINGS; WOUND HEALING APPLICATIONS;

CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY;

GENTAMICIN; GLYCEROL; SOYBEAN PROTEIN;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED RELEASE FORMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SAFETY; FIBROBLAST; FILM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84877133386     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.536     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cairns BA, de Seres S, Peterson HD et al. 1993; Skin replacements. The biotechnological quest for optimal wound closure. Arch Surg 128(11): 1246-1252.
2. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP 1999; Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284(5418): 1318-1322.
3. Elsner JJ, Berdicevsky I, Zilberman M. 2011; In vitro microbial inhibition and cellular response to novel biodegradable composite wound dressings with controlled release of antibiotics. Acta Biomater 7(1): 325-336.
4. Field FK, Kerstein MD. 1994; Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 167(1A): 2S-6S.
5. Gilbert P, Collier PJ, Brown MR 1990; Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy and stringent response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34(10): 1865-1868.
6. Harrison-Balestra C, Cazzaniga AL, Davis SC et al. 2003; A wound-isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is isualized by light microscopy. Dermatol Surg 29(6): 631-635.
7. Hill SD, Berry CW, Seale NS et al. 1991; Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of glutaraldehyde and formocresol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71(1): 89-95.
8. Kilian O, Hossain H, Flesch I et al. 2008; Elution kinetics, antimicrobial efficacy, and degradation and microvasculature of a new gentamicin-loaded collagen fleece. J Biomed Mater Res B 90(1): 210-222.
9. Kumar R, Choudhary V, Mishra S et al. 2002; Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Ind Crop Prod 16(3): 155-172.
10. Maruguchi T, Maruguchi Y, Suzuki S et al. 1994; A new skin equivalent: keratinocytes proliferated and differentiated on collagen sponge containing fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 93(3): 537-544.
11. Park SK, Hettiarachchy NS, Ju ZY et al. 2002; Formation and properties of soy protein films and coatings. In Protein-based Films and Coatings, Gennadios A (ed.). CRC Press: New York; 123-137.
12. Peles Z, Zilberman M. 2012; Novel soy protein wound dressings with controlled antibiotic release: mechanical and physical properties. Acta Biomater 8(1): 209-217.
13. Prabu P, Dharmaraj N, Santosh A et al. 2006; Preparation and drug release activity of scaffolds containing collagen and poly(caprolactone). J Biomed Mater Res A 79(1): 153-158.
14. Pruitt BA Jr, Levine NS. 1984; Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch Surg 119(3): 312-322.
15. Rangavajhyala N, Ghorpade V, Hanna M. 1997; Solubility and molecular properties of heat-cured soy protein films. J Agric Food Chem 45(11): 4204-4208.
16. Revathi G, Puri J, Jain BK. 1998; Bacteriology of burns. Burns 24(4): 347-349.
17. Santin M, Ambrosio L. 2008; Soybean-based biomaterials: preparation, properties and tissue regeneration potential. Expert Rev Med Device 5(3): 349-358.
18. Santin M, Morris C, Standen G et al. 2007; A new class of bioactive and biodegradable soybean-based bone fillers. Biomacromolecules 8(9): 2706-2711.
19. Seal R. 1980; Industrial soya protein technology. In Applied Protein Chemistry, Grant RA (ed.). Applied Science Publishers: London; 87-112.
20. Shanmugasundaram N, Sundaraseelan J, Uma S et al. 2006; Design and delivery of silver sulphadiazine from alginate microspheres-impregnated collagen scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77(2): 378-388.
21. Silva GA, Vaz CM, Coutinho OP et al. 2003; In vitro degradation and cytocompatibility evaluation of novel soy and sodium caseinate-based membrane biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14(12): 1055-1066.
22. Silva SS, Santos MI, Coutinho OP et al. 2005; Physical properties and biocompatibility of chitosan/soy blended membranes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(6): 575-579.
23. Snyders R, Shingel KI, Zabeida O et al. 2007; Mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid poly(ethylene glycol)-soy protein hydrogels for wound dressing applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 83A(1): 88-97.
24. Sripriya R, Kumar MS, Sehgal PK. 2004; Improved collagen bilayer dressing for the controlled release of drugs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 70(2): 389-396.
25. Trafny EA, Kowalska K, Grzybowski J. 1998; Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to collagen biomaterials: effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on the colonization and survival of the adherent organisms. J Biomed Mater Res 41(4): 593-599.
26. Vaz CM, Mano JF, Fossen M et al. 2002; Mechanical, dynamic-mechanical, and thermal properties of soy protein-based thermoplastics with potential biomedical applications. J Macromol Sci 41(1): 33-46.
27. Zilberman M, Elsner JJ. 2008; Antibiotic-eluting medical devices for various applications - a review. J Control Release 130: 202-215.