Evaluation of use of reading comprehension strategies to improve reading comprehension of adult college students with acquired brain injury

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 161-190

  Griffiths, Gina G ^a   Sohlberg, McKay Moore ^a   Kirk, Cecilia ^a   Fickas, Stephen ^a   Biancarosa, Gina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Acquired brain injury; Adult; College; Intervention; Reading

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN INJURY; COMPLICATION; COMPREHENSION; DYSLEXIA, ACQUIRED; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; READING; RECALL; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COMPREHENSION; DYSLEXIA, ACQUIRED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; READING; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84954378908     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: 14640694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1007878     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ackerman, R., DiRamio, D., & Mitchell, R. L. G. (2009). Transitions: Combat veterans as college students. New Directions for Student Services, 126, 5-14. doi:10.1002/ss. 311
2. Adler, D. A., Possemato, K., Mavandadi, S., Lerner, D., Chang, H., Klaus, J., . . Oslin, D. W. (2011). Psychiatric status and work performance of veterans of Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. Psychiatric Services, 62, 39-46. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.62.1.39
3. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
4. Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working?. European Psychologist, 7(2), 85-97. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.7.2.85
5. Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial & Special Education, 423-436. doi:10.1177/0741932509355988
6. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next - A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
7. Brookshire, B. L., Chapman, S. B., Song, J., & Levin, H. S. (2000). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: A three-year follow-up. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 741-751.
8. Caretti, B., Cornolid, C., DeBeni, R., & Romano, M. (2005). Updating of working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 45-66.
9. Carlisle, J. F. (1989). The use of the sentence verification technique in diagnostic assessment of listening and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Research, 5, 33-44.
10. Caspari, I., & Parkinson, S. R. (2000). Effects of memory impairment on discourse. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 15-36.
11. Chapman, S. B. (1997). Cognitive-communication abilities in children with closed head injury. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 6(2), 50-58.
12. Chazan, M. (2011). World prehistory and archeology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
13. Cicerone, K. D., & Giacino, J. T. (1992). Remediation of executive function deficits after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 2, 12-22.
14. Coelho, C., Le, K., Mozeiko, J., Hamilton, M., Tyler, E., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2013). Characterizing discourse deficits following penetrating head injury: A preliminary model. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S438.
15. Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Non-standardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223-241.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176.
18. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tacket, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes of older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research Spring, 79, 262-300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
20. Ellis, E. S., & Graves, A. W. (1990). Teaching students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10(2), 2-10.
21. Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., Okolo, C., Shankland, R. K., Moxley, K. D., Courtad, C. A., Jocks-Meier, B. S., O'Brien, J. C., Martin, N. M., & Chen, H-Y. (2009). The learning-tolearn strategies of adolescent students with disabilities: Highlighting, note taking, planning, and writing expository texts. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 147-161.
22. Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M. M., & Coronado, V. G. (2010). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
23. Federal Register. 2010. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC)-OMB's final decisions. Vol 74, No. 1 Fed. Reg. (January 21, 2009). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ pkg/FR-2009-01-21/pdf/E9-1094.pdf
24. Fertsl, E. C., Walther, K., Guthke, T., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Assessment of story comprehension deficits after brain damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 367-384.
25. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.
26. George, M. G., Tong, X., Kuklina, E. V., & Labarthe, D. R. (2011). Trends in stroke hospitalizations and associated risk factors among children and young adults, 1995-2008, Annals of Neurology, 70, 713-721. doi:10.1002/ana.22539.
27. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 27, 217-264.
28. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). General cognitive processes and mechanisms in text comprehension. In B. J. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 123-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
30. Gessel, L. M., Fields, S. K., Collins, C. L., Dicks, R. W., & Comstock, R. D. (2007). Concussions among United States high school and collegiate athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 42(4), 495-503.
31. Gillam, S. L., Fargo, J. D., & Robertson, K. S. C. (2009). Comprehension of expository text: Insights gained from think-aloud data. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 82-94.
32. Gilchrist, J., Thomas, K. E., Xu, L., McGuire, L. C., & Coronado, V. G. (2011). Nonfatal sports and recreation related traumatic brain injuries among children and adolescents treated in emergency departments in the United States, 2001-2009. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 60(39), 1337-1342.
33. Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies (pp. 3-26). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Griffiths, G. G., & Sohlberg, M. M. (2012). Same complaint, different profile. In annual conference of the International Neuropsychological Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
35. Harrison, L. H. (2010). The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1086/648963.
36. Hay, E., & Moran, C. (2005). Discourse formulation in children with closed head injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 324-336.
37. Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, A. A. (2008). Mild traumatic brain injury in U. S. soldiers returning from Iraq. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 453-463.
38. Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., & Ramirez, R. R. (2011). Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010. US Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/ c2010br-02.pdf
39. Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
40. Kennedy, M. R. T., & Coelho, C. (2005). Self-regulation after traumatic brain injury: A framework for intervention of memory and problem solving. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 242-255.
41. Kennedy, M. R. T., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., Ylvisaker, M., Sohlberg, M. M., Yorkston, K., . . Kan, P. F. (2008). Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(3), 257-299.
42. Kennedy, M. R., & Krause, M. O. (2011). Self-regulated learning in a dynamic coaching model for supporting college students with traumatic brain injury: Two case reports. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26(3), 212-223.
43. Kennedy, M. R. T., Krause, M. O., & Turkstra, L. S. (2008). An electronic survey about college experiences after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 511-520.
44. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
45. Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
46. Laatsch, L., & Krisky, C. (2006). Changes in fMRI activation following rehabilitation of reading and visual processing deficits in subjects with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(13-14), 1367-1375.
47. Laing Gillam, S., Fargo, J. D., & St Clair Robertson, K. (2009). Comprehension of expository text: Insights gained from think-aloud data. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 82.
48. Landauer, T., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). LSA: A road to meaning. Mahwah, NI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.) (2013). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
50. Lawson, M. M., & Rice, D. N. (1989). Effects of training use of executive strategies on verbal memory problem resulting from closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 6, 8420-8854.
51. Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2012). Predicting story goodness performance from cognitive measures following traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), S115-S125.
52. Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
53. Levine, T. R., & Hullet, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 612-625.
54. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
56. MacLennan, D. L., & MacLennan, D. C. (2008). Assessing readiness for post-secondary education after traumatic brain injury using a simulated college experience. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(6), 521-528.
57. Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A multidimensional framework to evaluate assessment tools. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 107-136). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Magliano, J., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K, Muñoz, B., & Mcnamara, D. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, 34, 181-188.
59. Mann, L. (2006). Teaching reading to adults with brain injury: A holistic framework for individualized reading instruction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor MI.
60. Matsuoka, K., Kotani, I., & Yamasato, M. (2012). Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13-14), 1723-1730.
61. McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z., & Graesser, A. (2005). Coh-Metrix version 1.4. From: http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu. Retrieved 8/12/2012.
62. Millis, K., Kim, H. J. J., Todaro, S., Magliano, J. P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2004). Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: Comparing semantic benchmarks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 213-221.
63. Millis, K., Magliano, J., & Todaro, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 225-240.
64. Moran, C., & Gillon, G. (2005). Inference comprehension of adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A working memory hypothesis. Brain Injury, 19, 743-751.
65. Moran, C., Kirk, C., & Powell, E. (2012). Spoken persuasive discourse abilities of adolescents with acquired brain injury. Language Speech Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 264-275.
66. Mozeiko, J., Lê, K., Coelho, C., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI. Aphasiology, 25(6-7), 826-835.
67. Nicholas, L., & Brookshire, R. E. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of connected speech of adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 36, 338-363.
68. Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices - Past, present, and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13-69). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
70. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
71. Royer, J. M., Hastings, C. N., & Hook, C. (1979). A sentence verification technique for measuring reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 11(4), 355-363.
72. Salmen, D. J. (2004). Differences in reading comprehension post-acquired brain injury: Real or imagined? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
73. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Bales, W. B. (2005). Understanding text after severe closed-head injury: Assessing inferences and memory operations with a think-aloud procedure. Brain and Language, 94, 331-346.
74. Shelburne, W. A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 33((2-3), 59-72.
75. Sohlberg, M. M., Ehlhardt, L., & Kennedy, M. (2005). Instructional techniques in cognitive rehabilitation: A preliminary report. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 268-279.
76. Sohlberg, M. M., Fickas, S., & Griffiths, G. G. (2011). Reading comprehension strategies delivered via tablet for individuals with acquired brain injury. Session presentation at American Speech Language and Hearing Association Annual Conference. San Diego, CA: November, 2011.
77. Sohlberg, M. M., Griffiths, G. G., & Fickas, S. (2014). An evaluation of reading comprehension of expository text in adults with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 23(2), 160-175.
78. Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (Eds.) (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford Press.
79. Sohlberg, M. M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2011). Optimizing cognitive rehabilitation. New York: Guilford Press.
80. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy-instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
81. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
82. Stewart-Scott, A. M., & Douglas, J. M. (1998). Educational outcomes for secondary and postsecondary students following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12(4), 317-331.
83. Stine-Morrow, E. A., Milinder, L., Pullara, O., & Herman, B. (2001). Patterns of resource allocation are reliable among younger and older readers. Psychology of Aging, 16, 69-84.
84. Stine-Morrow, E. A., Soederberg Miller, L. M., Gagne, D. D., & Hertzog, C. (2008). Self-regulated reading in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 131.
85. Sullivan, M. P., Griffiths, G. G., & Sohlberg, M. M. (2014). Effect of posttraumatic stress on study time in a task measuring four component processes underlying text-level reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1731-1739.
86. Sweet, A. P. (2005). Assessment of reading comprehension: The RAND Reading Study Group vision. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 3-12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
87. Todis, B., Glang, A., Bullis, M., Ettel, D., & Hood, D. (2011). Longitudinal investigation of the post-high school transition experiences of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26, 138-149.
88. Tompkins, C. A., Bloise, C. G., Timko, M. L., & Baumgaertner, A. (1994). Working memory and inference revision in brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 896-912.
89. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293-301.
90. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467-502.