Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: Comparing semantic benchmarks

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 213-221

  Millis, Keith ^a   Kim, Hyun Jeong Joyce ^b   Todaro, Stacey ^a   Magliano, Joseph P ^a   Wiemer Hastings, Katja ^a   McNamara, Danielle S ^c  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RHODES COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444292281     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195566     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. CHI, M. T. H., DE LEEUW, N., CHIU, M., & LAVANCHER, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
2. FOLTZ, P. W., GILLIAM, S., & KENDALL, S. A. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in online writing evaluations with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 111-129.
3. FOLTZ, P. W., LAHAM, D., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1999). The Intelligent Essay Assessor: Applications to educational technology [Special issue]. Interactive Multimedia Educational Journal, 1(2).
4. GRAESSER, A. C., SINGER, M., & TRABASSO, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
5. GRAESSER, A. C., WIEMER-HASTINGS, P., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., HARTER, D., PERSON, N., & THE TUTORING RESEARCH GROUP (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 129-147.
6. KURBY, C. A., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., GANDURI, N., MAGLIANO, J. P., MILLIS, K. K., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2003). Computerizing reading training: Evaluation of a latent semantic analysis space for science text. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 244-250.
7. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
8. LEVINSTEIN, I., MCNAMARA, D. S., BOONTHUM, C., PILLARAISETTI, P., & YADIVALLI, K. (2003). Web-based intervention for higher-order reading skills. In Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA '03 conference (pp. 835-841). Honolulu.
9. MAGLIANO, J. P., TRABASSO, T., & GRAESSER, A. C. (1999). Strategic processes during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
10. MAGLIANO, J. P., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., MILLIS, K. K., MUÑOZ, B. D., & MCNAMARA, D. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 181-188.
11. MCNAMARA, D. S. (2003). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. MCNAMARA, D. S., & SCOTT, J. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In M. Hahn & S. C. Sontess (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387-392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. MILLIS, K. K., MAGLIANO, J. P., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., & MCNAMARA, D. (2001). Using LSA in a computer-based test of reading comprehension. In J. D. Moore, C. Luckhardt-Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future. Vol. 68: Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 583-585). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
14. SHAPIRO, A. M., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2000). The use of latent semantic analysis as a tool for the quantitative assessment of understanding and knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 1-36.
15. TRABASSO, T., & MAGLIANO, J. P. (1996), Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-288.
16. TRABASSO, T., VAN DEN BROEK, P., & SUH, S. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in the representation of stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1-25.