The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI

Aphasiology

Volumn 25, Issue 6-7, 2011, Pages 826-835

  Mozeiko, Jennifer ^a   Le, Karen ^a   Coelho, Carl ^a   Krueger, Frank ^b   Grafman, Jordan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Executive function; Narrative discourse; Penetrating head injury; Story grammar; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; GRAMMAR; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARRATIVE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; STORYTELLING; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST;

EID: 79958814771     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2010.543983     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barrett, J. (1998). Old McDonald had an apartment house (2nd ed.). New York: Atheneum Publishers.
2. Coelho, C.A. (1998). Analysis of story grammar. In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analysing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 115-121). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
3. Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(6), 1232-1248.
4. Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., & Duffy R. J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 9, 471-477.
5. Coelho C. A., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardised assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223-241.
6. Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Co.
7. DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L.A. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbance in aphasics. Brain, 85, 665-678.
8. Dunbar, K., & Stussman, D. (1995). Toward a cognitive account of the frontal lobe function: Stimulating frontal lobe deficits in normal subjects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 289-304.
9. Eslinger, P. J., Zappala, G., Chakara, F., & Barrett, A. M. (2007). Cognitive impairments after TBI. In N.D.Zasler, D. I. Katz,&R. D. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine (pp. 779-790). New York: Demos.
10. Fortin, S., Godbout, L., & Braun, C. M. J. (2003). Cognitive structure of executive deficits in frontally lesioned head trauma patients performing activities of daily living. Cortex, 39, 273-291.
11. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948). A behavioural analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(4), 404-411.
12. Grafman, J. (1995). Similarities and distinctions among current models of prefrontal cortical functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 337-368.
13. Grafman, J., & Litvan, I. (1999). Importance of deficits in executive functions. The Lancet, 354, 1921-1923.
14. Gupta, R., Duff, M. C., Denburg, N. L., Cohen, N. J., Bechara, A., & Tranel, D. (2009). Declarative memory is critical for sustained advantageous complex decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 47(7), 1686-1693.
15. Hunt, K. (1965). Differences in grammatical structures written at three grade levels (NCTE Research Report No. 3). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16. Kaplan, E. F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
17. Kennedy, M. R. T., Wozniak, J. R., Muetzel, R. L., Mueller, B. A., Chiou, H. H., Pantekoek, K., et al. (2009). White matter and neurocognitive changes in adults with chronic traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 130-136.
18. Latzman, R. D., & Markon, K. E. (2010). The factor structure and age-related factorial invariance of the Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Assessment, 17, 172-184.
19. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Executive functions and motor performance. In M. D. Lezak (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.) (pp. 611-646).New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Merritt, D., & Liles, B. (1987). Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: Story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 30(4), 539-552.
21. Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., & Friedman, N. P. (2000). Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings: Problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21, 169-183.
22. Plag, J., & Goffman, J. (1967). The armed forces qualification test: Its validity in predicting military effectiveness for naval enlistees. Personnel Psychology, 20(3), 323-340.
23. Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., McInnes, L., & Rabbitt, P. (1997). A neural systems approach to the cognitive psychology of ageing using the CANTAB battery. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 215-238). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
24. Stein, N., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. D. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes: Vol. 2. New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53-119). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
25. Tucker, F. M., & Hanlon, R. E. (1998). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Injury, 12, 783-792.
26. Turkstra, L., Coelho, C., & Ylvisaker, M. (2005). The use of standardised tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 215-222.
27. U.S. Department of Defense. (1984). A test manual for the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Chicago, IL: United States Military Entrance Processing Command.
28. Ylvisaker, M., Szekeres, S. F., & Feeney, T. (2001). Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders, (pp. 745-800). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.