Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006: A meta-analysis

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 423-436

  Berkeley, Sheri ^a   Scruggs, Thomas E ^b   Mastropieri, Margo A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

learning disabilities; meta analysis; reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149429932     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932509355988     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
2. Abdulaziz, T.M. (1999). The role of elaborative interrogation in acquiring knowledge from expository prose passages for students with learning and behavior disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(01A), 132. (UMI No. 9957697).
3. Bakken, J.P., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science materials and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. Journal of Special Education, 31, 300-325.
4. Boyle, J.R. (1996). The effects of cognitive mapping strategy of the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 86-99.
5. Boyle, J.R. (2000). The effects of a Venn diagram strategy on the literal, inferential, and relational comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 5-13.
6. Bryant, D.P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 238-252.
7. Burns, G.L., & Kondrick, P.A. (1998). Psychological behaviorism's reading therapy program: Parents as reading therapists for their children's reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 278-285.
8. Calhoon, M.B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424-433.
9. Carr, S.C., & Thompson, B. (1996). The effects of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 48-61.
10. Carroll, L. (1995). Alice's adventures in wonderland. London: Anness. (Original work published 1865).
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
12. Conklin, J.T. (2000). The effect of presentation media on student reading comprehension. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(09A), 3512. (UMI No. 9988426).
13. Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1980). Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 4, 449-472.
14. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. DiCecco, V.M., & Gleason, M.M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306-320.
16. Dowrick, P.W., Kim-Rupnow, W.S., & Power, T.J. (2006). Video feedforward for reading. Journal of Special Education, 39, 194-207.
17. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 481-553.
18. Esser, M.M.S. (2001). The effects of metacognitive strategy training and attribution retraining on reading comprehension in African-American students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(7-A), 2340. (UMI No. 3021672).
19. Fagella-Luby, M. (2006). Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in secondary classes for diverse learners. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(2-A), 516. (UMI No. 3207952).
20. Forness, S.R. (2001). Special education and related services: What have we learned from meta-analysis? Exceptionality, 9, 185-197.
21. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
22. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309-318.
23. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A.K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.
24. Gardill, M.C., & Jitendra, A.K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 2-17, 28.
25. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-321.
26. Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
28. Heise, K. (2004). The effects of the Read Naturally program on fluency, accuracy, comprehension, and student motivation in students with learning disabilities. Masters Abstracts International, 42(06), 1957. (UMI No. 1419865).
29. Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van de Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 237-245.
30. Jitendra, A.K., Hoppes, M.K., & Xin, Y.P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127-139.
31. Johnson, L., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instructions on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80-91.
32. Katims, D.S., & Harris, S. (1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41, 116-123.
33. Kim, A. (2002). Effects of computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading on reading comprehension for high-school students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(11A), 4009. (UMI No. 3110632).
34. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J.K., Woodruff, A.L., Reutebuch, C.K., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235-249.
35. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A syntheses of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105-118.
36. Klingner, J.K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96, 275-293.
37. Laub, C.M. (1997). Effectiveness of Project Read on word attack skills and comprehension for third and fourth grade students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(01), 0036. (UMI No. 1386289).
38. Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., Warren-Chaplin, P.M., Lacerenza, L., DeLuca, L., & Giovinazzo, R. (1996). Text comprehension training for disabled readers: An evaluation of reciprocal teaching and text analysis training programs. Brain and Language, 54, 447-480.
39. MacArthur, C.A., & Haynes, J.B. (1995). Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT): A hypermedia reading aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 150-159.
40. Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59-74.
41. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
42. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Bakken, J.P., & Whedon, C. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Intervention research (Vol. 10, pt. B, pp. 201-227). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
43. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Berkeley, S. (2007). Peers helping peers. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 54-58.
44. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. (in press). Does special education improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education.
45. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116.
46. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Hamilton, S.L., Wolfe, S., Whedon, C., & Canevaro, A. (1996). Promoting thinking skills of students with learning disabilities: Effects on recall and comprehension of expository prose. Exceptionality, 6, 1-11.
47. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mohler, L., Beranek, M., Boon, R., Spencer, V.,et al.(2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 18-27.
48. Miranda, A., Villaescusa, M.I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (1997). Is attribution retraining necessary? Use of self-regulation procedures for enhancing the reading comprehension strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 503-512.
49. Mothus, T.G. (1997). The effects of strategy instruction on the reading comprehension achievement of junior secondary school students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(01), 44. (UMI No. 766434601).
50. Newbern, S.L. (1998). The effects of instructional settings on the efficacy of strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(05A), 1527. (UMI No. 9832950).
51. Oakland, T., Black, J.L., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N.L., & Balise, R.R. (1998). An evaluation of the dyslexia training program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 140-147.
52. Parloff, M.B. (1984). Psychotherapy research and its incredible credibility crisis. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 95-109.
53. Peverly, S.T., & Wood, R. (2001). The effects of adjunct questions and feedback on improving the reading comprehension skills of learning-disabled adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 25-43.
54. Rabren, K., Darch, C., & Eaves, R.C. (1999). The differential effects of two systematic reading comprehension approaches with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 36-47.
55. Rankhorn, B., England, G., Collins, S.M., Lockavitch, J.F., & Algozzine, B. (1998). Effects of the failure free reading program on students with severe reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 307-312.
56. Rooney, J. (1997). The effects of story grammar strategy training on the story comprehension, self-efficacy and attributions of learning disabled students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(5-A), 1642. (UMI No. 9732965).
57. Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C., & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin: Statistical software for meta-analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
58. Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412-415.
59. Saenz, L.M., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 231-247.
60. Scruggs, T.E., Bennion, K., & Lifson, S. (1985). Learning disabled students' spontaneous use of test-taking skills on reading achievement tests. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 205-210.
61. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & McDuffie, K.A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
62. Sideridis, G.D., Mouzaki, A., Simos, P., & Protopapas, A. (2006). Classification of students with reading comprehension difficulties: The roles of motivation, affect, and psychopathology. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 159-180.
63. Stevens, R.J., & Slavin, R.E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effect on student achievement and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321-351.
64. Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
65. Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (2000). Intervention research for students with learning disabilities: A comprehensive meta-analysis of group design studies. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 14. Educational interventions (pp. 1-153). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
66. Swanson, H.L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
67. Swanson, H.L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 114-136.
68. Talbott, E., Lloyd, J.W., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223-232.
69. Thompson, B. (2006). Research synthesis: Effect sizes. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 583-603). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
70. Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
71. Ugel, N.S. (1999). The effects of a multicomponent reading intervention on the reading achievement of middle school students with reading disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(01A), 118. (UMI No. 9959597).
72. Vaughn, S., Chard, D.J., Bryant, D.P., Coleman, M., & Kouzekanani, K. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 325-335.
73. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, J.D. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
74. Vaughn, S., Levy, S., Coleman, M., & Bos, C.S. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observation studies. Journal of Special Education, 36, 2-13.
75. Williams, J.P. (1998). Improving the comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 213-238.
76. Xin, J.F., & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 87-103.