Characterizing discourse deficits following penetrating head injury: A preliminary model

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Coelho, Carl ^a   Lê, Karen ^a   Mozeiko, Jennifer ^a   Hamilton, Mark ^a   Tyler, Elizabeth ^a   Krueger, Frank ^b   Grafman, Jordan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Rehabilitation Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Executive functions; Language disorders; Memory; Pragmatics; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878185474     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barrett, J. (1998). Old McDonald had an apartment house (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Atheneum.
2. Body, R., & Perkins, M. (2004). Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 707-724.
3. Brookshire, B., Chapman, S., Song, J., & Levin, H. (2000). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: A three-year follow-up. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 741-751.
4. Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1993). The Discourse Comprehension Test. Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
5. Chapman, S., Gamino, J. F., Cook, L. G., Hanten, G., Xiaoqi, L., & Levin, H. S. (2006). Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury. Brain and Language, 97, 178-188.
6. Chapman, S. B., McKinnon, L., Levin, H. S., Song, J., Meier, M. C., & Chiu, S. (2001). Longitudinal outcome of verbal discourse in children with traumatic brain injury: Three-year follow-up. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 441-455.
7. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.
8. Coelho, C. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1232-1248.
9. Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following TBI: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 122-135.
10. Coelho, C., Lê, K., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2012). Discourse production following injury to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3564-3572.
11. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991). Discourse analyses with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 465-468.
12. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically braininjured adults. Brain Injury, 9, 471-477.
13. Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223-241.
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Davis, G., & Coelho, C. (2004). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 89, 508-523.
16. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
17. DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L. A. (1962). The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbance in aphasics. Brain, 85, 665-678.
18. Dikmen, S., Corrigan, J., Levin, H., Machamer, M., Stiers, W., & Weisskopf, M. (2009). Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24, 430-438.
19. Dimitrov, M., Grafman, J., Soares, A., & Clark, K. (1999). Concept formation and concept shifting in frontal lesion and Parkinson's disease patients assessed with the California Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychology, 13, 135-143.
20. Duff, M. C., Mutlu, M., Byom, L., & Turkstra, L. S. (2012). Beyond utterances: Distributed cognition as a framework for studying discourse in adults with acquired brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33, 44-54.
21. Ferstl, E., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 581-593.
22. Galski, T., Tompkins, C., & Johnston, M. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 769-782.
23. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gernsbacher, M. A., Tallent, K. A., & Bollinger, C. M. (1999). Disordered discourse in schizophrenia described by the structure building framework. Discourse Studies, 1(3), 355-372.
25. Grafman, J., Jonas, B. S., Martin, A., Salazar, A. M., Weingartner, H., Ludlow, C., ... Vance, S. C. (1988). Intellectual function following penetrating head injury in Vietnam veterans. Brain, 111(Pt 1), 169-184.
26. Heilman, K. M., Safran, A., & Geschwind, N. (1971). Closed head trauma and aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 34, 265-269.
27. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
28. Hunt, K. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 1-78.
29. Kaplan, E. F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
30. Kenny, D. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/causalm.htm.
31. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
32. Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., & Grafman, J. (2011). Measuring goodness of story narratives. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 118-126.
33. Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). Measuring goodness of story narratives: Implications for traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 25, 748-760.
34. Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2012). Predicting story goodness performance from cognitive measures following traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 21, S115-S125.
35. Liles, B. Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123-133.
36. Liles, B. Z., & Coelho, C. A. (1998). Cohesion analysis. In L. Cherney, B. Shadden, & C. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 65-84). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
37. Liles, B. Z., Duffy, R. J., Merritt, D., & Purcell, S. (1995). Measurement of narrative discourse ability in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 415-425.
38. Makale, M., Solomon, J., Patronas, N. J., Danek, A., Butman, J. A., & Grafman, J. (2002). Quantification of brain lesions using interactive automated software. Behavioral Research Methods Instrumentation and Computation, 34, 6-18.
39. Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., & Friedman, N. P. (2000). Assessments of executive functions in clinical settings: Problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21, 169-183.
40. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.
41. Mohr, J. P., Weiss, G. H., Caveness, W. F., Dillon, J. D., Kistler, J. P., Meirowsky, A. M., & Rish, B. L. (1980). Language and motor disorders after penetrating head injury in Vietnam. Neurology, 30, 1273-1279.
42. Mozeiko, J., Lê, K., Coelho, C., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI. Aphasiology, 25, 826-835.
43. Plag, J., & Goffman, J. (1967). The Armed Forces Qualification Test: Its validity in predicting military effectiveness for naval enlistees. Personnel Psychology, 20(3), 323-340.
44. Raymont, V., Salazar, A. M., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). "Studying injured minds"-The Vietnam Head Injury Study and 40 years of brain injury research. Frontiers in Neurotrauma. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00015
45. Scheid, R., Walther, K., Guthke, T., Preul, C., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Cognitive sequelae of diffuse axonal injury. Archives of Neurology, 63(3), 418.
46. Schwartz-Cowley, R., & Stepanik, M. J. (1989). Communication disorders and treatment in the acute trauma center setting. Topics in Language Disorders, 9, 1-11.
47. Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury, 12, 911-935.
48. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Stout, C., Yorkston, K., & Pimental, J. (2000). Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 15-25.
50. Tucker, F., & Hanlon, R. (1998). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Injury, 12, 783-792.
51. U.S. Department of Defense. (1984). A test manual for the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Chicago, IL: U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command.
52. Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 327-349.
53. Wechsler, D. A. (1997a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale, Third Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Pearson Assessment.
54. Wechsler, D. A. (1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Pearson Assessment.
55. Wertheimer, J. C., Hanks, R. A., & Hasenau, D. L. (2008). Comparing functional status and community integration in severe penetrating and motor vehicle-related brain injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1983-1990.
56. Ylioja, S., Hanks, R., Baird, A., & Millis, S. (2010). Are cognitive outcome and recovery different in civilian penetrating versus non-penetrating brain injuries? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 1097-1112.
57. Ylvisaker, M., Szekeres, S. F., & Feeney, T. (2008). Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (5th ed., pp. 879-962). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
58. Youse, K. M., & Coelho, C. A. (2005). Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed-head injury. Brain Injury, 19, 1001-1009.
59. Zafonte, R. D., Mann, N. R., Millis, S. R., Wood, D. L., Lee, C. Y., & Black, K. L. (1997). Functional outcome after violence related traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 11, 403-407.