Comprehension of expository text: Insights gained from think-aloud data

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 82-94

  Gillam, Sandra Laing ^a   Fargo, Jamison D ^a   Robertson, Kelli St Clair ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Champion Partners in Rehabilitation   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Expository text; School age children

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349112835     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0074)     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexander, P., Murphy, P., Woods, B., Duhon, K., & Parker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
2. Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Gromoll, E. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99-158.
3. Braten, I., & Stromso, H. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 195-218.
4. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., & Johnsen, S. (1998). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
5. Bryant, D., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School & Clinic, 34, 293-305.
6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 697-708.
7. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30, 681-694.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cook, L., & Mayer, R. (1988). Teaching readers about the nature of science text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456.
11. Cote, N., Goldman, S., & Saul, E. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1-5.
12. Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 579-591.
13. Ellis, E., & Graves, A. (1990). Teaching rural students with learning disabilities a paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10, 2-10.
14. Ericson, K., & Simon, H. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fossett, T., McNeil, M., Doyle, P., Rubinsky, H., Nixon, S., Hula, W., & Brady, J. (2004). Assessing the validity of multiple-choice questions for RAPP passage comprehension. Aphasiology, 18, 493-519.
16. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A., Good, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.
17. Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508-516.
18. Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1996). The relationship between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third grade children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 563-582.
19. Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52-68.
20. Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Griffin, C., Simmons, D., & Kame'enui, E. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizers instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7, 355-376.
22. Joffe, V., Cain, K., & Maric, N. (2007). Comprehension problem in children with language impairment: Does mental imagery training help? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 648-664.
23. Katims, D., & Harris, S. (1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41, 116-124.
24. Kibby, M., Marks, W., Morgan, S., & Long, C. (2004). Specific impairment in developmental reading disabilities: A working memory approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 349-363.
25. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, learning, and memory. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303.
26. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1996). Four fourth-graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259-287.
27. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271-299.
28. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (2003). Inviting students to talk about expository texts: A comparison of two discourse environments and their effects on comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 42, 1-31.
29. Laing, S., & Kamhi, A. (2002). The use of think-aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below average readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 436-447.
30. Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more and less skilled readers: Comprehension of easy and difficult text. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 525-556.
31. Linderholm, T., Gaddy, E., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more and less skilled readers comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 525-556.
32. Lund, S., & Light, J. (2003). The effectiveness of grammar instruction for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication systems: A preliminary study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1110-1123.
33. McGraw-Hill Learning Materials. (1998). Spectrum reading: Grade 4. Columbus, OH: School Specialty.
34. Meyer, B., & Freedle, R. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-134.
35. Millis, K., Magliano, J., & Todaro, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 225-240.
36. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158.
37. Nation, K., & Angell, P. (2006). Learning to read and learning to comprehend. London Review of Education, 4, 77-87.
38. Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 199-211.
39. Noordman, L., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573-590.
40. Norbury, C., & Bishop, D. (2002). Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: A comparison of specific language impairments, pragmatic language impairments and high functioning autism. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 227-251.
41. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
42. Paris, S., & Stahl, S. (2005). Children's reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Royer, J. (2001). A team approach to developing listening and reading comprehension tests based on the sentence verification technique (SVT). Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 30-43.
45. Schumaker, J., Denton, P., & Deshler, D. (1984). The Paraphrasing Strategy: Instructor's manual. Lawrence: University of Kansas Institute for Research on Learning.
46. Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (1995). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
47. Silliman, E., Bahr, R., Beasman, J., & Wilkinson, L. (2000). Scaffolds for learning to read in an inclusion classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 265-279.
48. Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199-228.
49. Spache, G. (1967). Reading technology. In G. Scick & M. May (Eds.), Junior college and adult reading programs - expanding fields: Sixteenth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 178-184). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.
50. Stein, N., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Stromso, H., Braten, I., & Samuelstun, M. (2003). Students' strategic use of multiple sources during expository text reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 113-147.
52. Strong, C., & Shaver, J. (1991). Stability of cohesion in the spoken narratives of language-impaired and normally developing school-aged children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 95-111.
53. Suh, S. (1989). Causal inferences during text comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
54. Tomblin, B., Records, N., & Zhang, X. (1996). A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1284-1294.
55. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. (1996a). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
56. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M. Graves, P. Van den Brock, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read (pp. 160-188). New York: Teachers College Press.
57. van Kleeck, A., Vander Woude, J., & Hammett, L. (2006). Fostering literal and inferential language skills in Headstart preschoolers with language impairments using scripted booksharing discussions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 85-95.
58. Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.