Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 57-77

  Douglas, Karen M ^a   Sutton, Robbie M ^a   Callan, Mitchell J ^b   Dawtry, Rael J ^a   Harvey, Annelie J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conspiracy theories; Education; Hypersensitive agency detection; Intentionality bias; Paranormal beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948572416     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. M.Abalakina-Paap,, W.G.Stephan,, T.Craig,, & L.Gregory, (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647.
2. F.Agnoli,, & D.H.Krantz, (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 515–550.
3. K.Banerjee,, & P.Bloom, (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition, 133, 277–303.
4. R.M.Baron,, & D.A.Kenny, (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5. J.L.Barrett, (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
6. J.L.Barrett, (2007). Is the spell really broken? Bio-psychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science, 5, 57–72.
7. J.Bartlett,, & C.Miller, (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. London: Demos.
8. S.T.Bird,, & L.M.Bogart, (2003). Birth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 263–276.
9. L.M.Bogart,, & S.T.Thorburn, (2005). Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs as barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38, 213–218.
10. L.M.Bogart,, & S.T.Thorburn, (2006). Relationship of African Americans' socio demographic characteristics to belief in conspiracies about HIV/AIDS and birth control. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 1144–1150.
11. C.N.Brinch,, & T.A.Galloway, (2012). Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 425–430.
12. R.Brotherton,, & C.C.French, (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 238–248.
13. R.Brotherton,, A.D.Pickering,, & C.C.French, (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.
14. J.M.Burger,, & H.M.Cooper, (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381–393.
15. J.Byford, (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
16. M.J.Callan,, R.M.Sutton,, A.J.Harvey,, & R.J.Dawtry, (2014). Immanent justice reasoning: Theory, research and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 105–161.
17. S.Clarke, (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131–150.
18. D.Coady, (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Hampshire: Ashgate.
19. P.J.Cozzolino, (2011). Trust, cooperation and equality: A psychological analysis of the formation of social capital. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 203–320.
20. H.Darwin,, N.Neave,, & J.Holmes, (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289–1293.
21. K.M.Douglas,, & R.M.Sutton, (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210–221.
22. K.M.Douglas,, & R.M.Sutton, (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 544–552.
23. K.M.Douglas,, R.M.Sutton,, D.Jolley,, & M.J.Wood, (2015). The social, political, environmental and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M.Bilewicz, A.Cichocka, & W.Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
24. M.Eckblad,, & L.J.Chapman, (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.
25. M.Fenster, (1999). Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
26. A.Furnham, (2013). Commercial conspiracy theories: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 379.
27. W.M.Gervais,, & A.Norenzayan, (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
28. T.Goertzel, (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742.
29. R.A.Griggs,, S.L.Jackson,, P.Marek,, & A.N.Christopher, (1998) Critical thinking in introductory psychology texts and supplements. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 254–266.
30. D.Groh, (1987). The temptation of conspiracy theory or: why do bad things happen to good people? Part I: Preliminary draft of a theory of conspiracy theories. In C.F.Graumann & S.Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy. (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Springer.
31. S.E.Guthrie, (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. A.F.Hayes, (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
33. A.F.Hayes, (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. F.Heider, & M.Simmel, (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
35. R.Imhoff,, & M.Bruder, (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.
36. P.K.Jonason,, & G.D.Webster, (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.
37. D.Jolley,, & K.M.Douglas, (2014a). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases the intention to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56.
38. D.Jolley,, & K.M.Douglas, (2014b). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89177.
39. D.Kelemen, (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.
40. D.Kelemen, (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.
41. D.Kelemen,, & C.DiYanni, (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3–31.
42. J.A.Lanman, (2012). The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27, 49–65.
43. P.J.Leman,, & M.Cinnirella, (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9, 18–28.
44. S.Lewandowsky,, K.Oberauer,, & G.Gignac, (2013). NASA faked the moon landing- Therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633.
45. M.Lipsey,, & D.B.Wilson, (2001). Practical meta-analysis. California, CA: Sage.
46. C.McCauley,, & S.Jacques, (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: a Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637–644.
47. J.McClure,, D.J.Hilton,, & R.M.Sutton, (2007). Judgements of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879–901.
48. J.W.McHoskey, (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395–409.
49. S.Miller, (2002). Conspiracy theories: public arguments as coded social critiques. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 40–56.
50. A.K.Newheiser,, M.Farias,, & N.Tausch, (2011). The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 1007–1011.
51. J.E.Oliver,, & T.J.Wood, (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 952–966.
52. K.Peltzer, (2003). Magical thinking and paranormal beliefs among secondary and university students in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1419–1426.
53. G.Pennycook,, J.A.Cheyne,, N.Barr,, D.J.Koehler,, & J.A.Fugelsang, (2014). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking and Reasoning, 20, 188–214.
54. G.Pennycook,, J.A.Cheyne,, P.Seli,, D.J.Koehler,, & J.A.Fugelsang, (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
55. R.S.Plomin,, & J.M.Post, (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. T.Riekki,, M.Lindeman,, & T.T.Raji, (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement that skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9, 400–411.
57. S.J.Ritchie,, T.C.Bates,, & R.Plomin, (2015). Does learning to read improve intelligence? A longitudinal multivariate analysis in identical twins from age 7 to 16. Child Development, 86, 23–36.
58. E.Rosset, (2008). It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.
59. Z.Rubin,, & L.A.Peplau, (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.
60. B.J.Scholl,, & R.D.Tremoulet, (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.
61. P.Sedlmeier,, & G.Gigerenzer, (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400.
62. A.Shenhav,, D.G.Rand,, & J.D.Greene, (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
63. C.R.Snyder,, & H.L.Fromkin, (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–527.
64. S.Stieger,, N.Gumhalter,, U.S.Tran,, M.Voracek,, & V.Swami, (2013). Girl in the cellar: A repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 297.
65. C.R.Sunstein,, & A.Vermeule, (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227.
66. R.M.Sutton,, & K.M.Douglas, (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In J.-W.van Prooijen & P.A.M.van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 254–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. V.Swami, (2012). Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.
68. V.Swami,, & R.Coles, (2010). The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23, 560–563.
69. V.Swami,, T.Chamorro-Premuzic,, & A.Furnham, (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749–761.
70. V.Swami,, R.Coles,, S.Stieger,, J.Pietschnig,, A.Furnham,, S.Rehim,, & M.Voracek, (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463.
71. V.Swami,, M.Voracek,, S.Stieger,, U.S.Tran,, & A.Furnham, (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585.
72. M.M.Thompson,, M.E.Naccarato,, & K.E.Parker, (1989). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Canadian Psychological Society. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
73. M.E.Toplak,, & K.E.Stanovich, (2003). Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post-secondary education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 851–860.
74. A.Tversky,, & D.Kahneman, (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
75. J.E.Uscinski,, & J.M.Parent, (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76. J.-W.van Prooijen,, & N.B.Jostmann, (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115.
77. J.-W.van Prooijen,, & E.van Dijk, (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63–73.
78. A.Waytz,, J.Cacioppo,, & N.Epley, (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219–232.
79. C.Welzel,, R.Inglehart,, & F.Deutsch, (2005). Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff? Journal of Civic Society, 2, 121–146.
80. M.J.Wood,, & K.M.Douglas, (2013). “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.
81. M.Wood,, K.M.Douglas,, & R.M.Sutton, (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.
82. T.Yamagishi,, & M.Yamagishi, (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.