The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 210-222

  Douglas, Karen M ^a   Sutton, Robbie M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitude change or persuasion; Conspiracy theories; Self other bias; Third person effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649193882     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beckles, C. (1997). Black struggles in cyberspace: Cyber-segregation and cyber-Nazis. Western Journal of Black Studies, 21, 12-19.
2. Bern, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 23-31.
3. Cohen, J., Mutz, D., Price, V., & Gunther, A. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.
4. Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941-953.
5. David, P., & Johnson, M. A. (1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image. Journal of Communication, 48, 37-58.
6. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
7. Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computermediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
8. Douglas, K. M, & McGarty, C. (2002). On computers and elsewhere: A model of the effects of Internet identifiability on communicative behaviour. Group Dynamics, 6, 17-26.
9. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2004). Right about others, wrong about ourselves? Actual and perceived self-other differences in resistance to persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 585-603.
10. Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215.
11. Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1998). Perceived self-other differences in persuasibility: The effects of interpersonal and group-based similarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1-21.
12. Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1999). Social identity and perceptions of media persuasion: Are we always less influenced than others? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1879-1899.
13. Duck, J. M, & Mullin, B. A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-93.
14. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299.
15. Gibbon, P., & Durkin, K. (1995). The third person effect: Social distance and perceived media bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 597-602.
16. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-742. Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
17. Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
18. Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgements of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311-327.
19. Innes, J. M., & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the 'third person' effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463.
20. Krueger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
21. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
22. Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666-677.
23. LondonNet. (2005). Princess Diana: The conspiracy theories. Retrieved July 27, 2006, from http://www.londonnet.co.uk/ln/talk/news/ diana_conspiracy_theories.html
24. Markus, G. B. (1986). Stability and change in political attitudes: Observed, recalled, and "explained." Political Behavior, 8, 21-44.
25. Mason, F. (2002). A poor person's cognitive mapping. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 40-56). New York: New York University Press.
26. McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637-644.
27. McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395-409.
28. Melley, T. (2002). Agency, panic and the culture of conspiracy. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 57-81). New York: New York University Press.
29. Nunnally, J. C. (1977). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Parsons, S., Simmons, W., Shinhoster, F., & Kilburn, J. (1999). A test of the grapevine: An empirical examination of conspiracy theories among African Americans. Sociological Spectrum, 19, 201-222.
31. Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
32. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).
33. Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: Freeman.
34. Simmons, W. P., & Parsons, S. (2005). Beliefs in conspiracy theories among African Americans: A comparison of elites and masses. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 582-598.
35. Sutton, R. M, & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More support for the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637-645.
36. Willman, S. (2002). Spinning paranoia: The ideologies of conspiracy and contingency in postmodern culture. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 21-39). New York: New York University Press.
37. Wixon, D. R., & Laird, J. D. (1976). Awareness and attitude change in the forced-compliance paradigm: The importance of when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 376-384.
38. Zickmund, S. (1997). Approaching the radical other: The discursive culture of cyberhate. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 185-205). London: Sage.