When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 63-73

  Van Prooijen, Jan Willem ^a   Van Dijk, Eric ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consequence size; Conspiracy beliefs; Empathy; Intergroup threat; Perspective taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903376901     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abalakina-Paap M., Stephan W., Craig T., Gregory W.L. Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology 1999, 20:637-647.
2. Atran S., Henrich J. The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory 2010, 5:18-30.
3. Bale J.M. Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspirational politics. Patterns of Prejudice 2007, 41:45-60.
4. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Hill J., Raster Y., Plumb I. The "Reading the mind in the eyes" test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001, 42:241-251.
5. Batson C.D. The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer 1991, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Batson C.D., Eklund J.H., Chermok V.L., Hoyt J.L., Ortiz B.G. An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:65-74.
7. Bentall R.P., Corcoran R., Howard R., Blackwood N., Kinderman P. Persecutory delusions: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review 2001, 21:1145-1192.
8. Bering J. The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life 2011, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY.
9. Clarke S. Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2002, 32:131-150.
10. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
11. Correia I., Vala J., Aguiar P. Victim's innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:31-38.
12. Crocker J., Luhtanen R., Broadnax S., Blaine B.E. Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against blacks among black and white college students: Powerlessness or system blame?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1999, 25:941-953.
13. Davis M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44:113-126.
14. Davis M.H., Soderlund T., Cole J., Gadol E., Kute M., Myers M., et al. Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:1625-1635.
15. Douglas K.M., Sutton R.M. Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology 2011, 50:193-364.
16. Epley N., Caruso E.M., Bazerman M.H. When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:872-889.
17. Eyal T., Epley N. How to seem telepathic: Enabling mind reading by matching construal. Psychological Science 2010, 21:700-705.
18. Fielder K., Freytag P., Unkelbach C. Great oaks from giant acorns grow: How causal-impact judgments depend on the strength of a cause. European Journal of Social Psychology 2011, 41:162-172.
19. Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F. Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model 2000, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Galinsky A.D., Moskowitz G.B. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:708-724.
21. Goertzel T. Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 1994, 15:733-744.
22. Hofstadter R. The paranoid style in American politics. The paranoid style in American politics and other essays 1966, 3-40. Knopf, New York, NY. R. Hofstadter (Ed.).
23. Jolley D., Douglas K. The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprints. British Journal of Psychology 2014, 105:35-56.
24. Kay A.C., Gaucher D., Napier J.L., Callan M.J., Laurin K. God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external control systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:18-35.
25. Kramer R.M., Messick D.M. Getting by with a little help from our enemies: Collective paranoia and its role in intergroup relations. Intergroup cognition and intergroup behaviour 1998, 233-255. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, C.A. Insko (Eds.).
26. LeBoeuf R.A., Norton M.I. Consequence-cause matching: Looking to the consequences of events to infer their causes. Journal of Consumer Research 2012, 39:128-141.
27. Leman P.J., Cinirella M. A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychology Review 2007, 9:18-28.
28. Lerner M.J., Miller D.T. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:1030-1051.
29. Lewandowski S., Oberauer K., Gignac G. NASA faked the moon landing-Therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science 2013, 24:622-633.
30. Loewenstein G., Small D.A. The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology 2007, 11:112-126.
31. McCauley C., Jacques S. The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:637-644.
32. Newheiser A.-K., Farias M., Tausch N. The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences 2011, 51:1007-1011.
33. Park C.L. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:257-301.
34. Pipes D. Conspiracy: How the paranoid style flourishes and where it comes from 1997, Simon & Schusters, New York, NY.
35. Robins R.S., Post J.M. Political paranoia: The psychopolitics of hatred 1997, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
36. Shermer M. The believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies-How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths 2011, Henry Holt, New York, NY.
37. Stinson L., Ickes W. Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:787-797.
38. Sullivan D., Landau M.J., Rothschild Z.K. An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 98:434-449.
39. Sunstein C.R., Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy 2009, 17:202-227.
40. Sutton R.M., Douglas K.M. Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (in press). J.-W. van Prooijen, P.A.M. van Lange (Eds.).
41. Swami V. Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-9.
42. Swami V., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A. Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010, 24:749-761.
43. Swami V., Coles R., Stieger S., Pietschnig J., Furnham A., Rehim S., et al. Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology 2011, 102:443-463.
44. Swami V., Pietschnig J., Tran U.S., Nader I.W., Stieger S., Voracek M. Lunar lies: The impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 27:71-80.
45. Todd A.R., Burgmer P. Perspective taking and automatic intergroup evaluation change: Testing an associative self-anchoring account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2013, 104:786-802.
46. Van den Bos K. Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:197-217.
47. Van Doesum N.J., Van Lange D.A.W., Van Lange P.A.W. Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2013, 105:86-103.
48. Van Honk J., Schutter D.J., Bos P.A., Kruijt A.-W., Lentjes E.G., Baron-Cohen S. Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 108:3448-3452.
49. Van Prooijen J.-W., Coffeng J. What is fair punishment for Alex or Ahmed? Perspective taking increases racial bias in retributive justice judgments. Social Justice Research 2013, 26:383-399.
50. Van Prooijen J.-W., Jostmann N.B. Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology 2013, 43:109-115.
51. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K. We blame innocent victims more than I do: Self-construal level moderates responses to just world threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35:1528-1539.
52. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van Lange P.A.M. The social dimension of belief in conspiracy theories. Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders 2014, 237-253. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. J.-W. van Prooijen, P.A.M. van Lange (Eds.).
53. Whitson J.A., Galinsky A.D. Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science 2008, 322:115-117.
54. Wood M.J., Douglas K.M., Sutton R.M. Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012, 3:767-773.
55. Zonis M., Joseph C.M. Conspiracy thinking in the middle east. Political Psychology 1994, 15:443-459.