Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events

Cognition

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 277-303

  Banerjee, Konika ^a   Bloom, Paul ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive biases; Fate; Life events; Religion; Teleological reasoning; Theory of mind

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE BIAS; EDUCATION; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTUITION; LIFE EVENT; MALE; PARANOIA; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; SPECTRUM; TELEOLOGICAL REASONING; THEORY OF MIND; THINKING; COGNITION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;

ADULT; COGNITION; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE CHANGE EVENTS; MALE; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY; THEORY OF MIND; THINKING;

EID: 84904902747     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (in press). "Everything happens for a reason:" Children's beliefs about purpose in life events. Child Development.
2. Banerjee K., Bloom P. Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(1):7-8.
3. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2004, 34(2):163-175.
4. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Skinner R., Martin J., Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2001, 31(1):5-17.
5. Barrett J.L. Born believers: The science of children's religious beliefs 2012, Free Press, New York.
6. Barrett J.L., Keil F.C. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in god concepts. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 31(3):219-247.
7. Bègue L., Bushman B.J., Giancola P.R., Subra B., Rosset E. "There is no such thing as an accident", especially when people are drunk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2010, 36(10):1301-1304.
8. Bering J.M. The existential theory of mind. Review of General Psychology 2002, 6(1):3.
9. Bering J.M. Towards a cognitive theory of existential meaning. New Ideas in Psychology 2003, 21(2):101-120.
10. Bering J.M. The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006, 29(5):453-456.
11. Bering J. Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markússon rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators of underlying cognition. Religion 2010, 40(3):166-168.
12. Bering J.M. The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life 2011, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York.
13. Bering J.M., Parker B.D. Children's attributions of intentions to an invisible agent. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42(2):253-262.
14. Bloom P. Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human 2004, Basic Books, New York.
15. Bloom P. Religion is natural. Developmental Science 2007, 10:147-151.
16. Bloom P., Weisberg D.S. Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2007, 316(5827):996-997.
17. Bohner G., Bless H., Schwarz N., Strack F. What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. European Journal of Social Psychology 1988, 18(4):335-345.
18. Boyer P. Religion explained 2001, Basic Books, New York.
19. Bressan P. The connection between random sequences, everyday coincidences, and belief in the paranormal. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2002, 16(1):17-34.
20. Caldwell-Harris, C. L., Murphy, C. F., Velazquez, T., & McNamara, P., (2011). Religious belief systems of persons with high functioning Autism. In Proceedings of the thirty-third annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA.
21. Casler K., Kelemen D. Developmental continuity in the teleo-functional explanation: Reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults. Journal of Cognition and Development 2008, 9:340-362.
22. Converse B.A., Risen J.L., Carter T.J. Investing in karma: When wanting promotes helping. Psychological Science 2012, 23(8):923-930.
23. DeRidder R., Hendriks E., Zani B., Pepitone A., Saffiotti L. Additional cross-cultural evidence on the selective usage of nonmaterial beliefs in explaining life events. European Journal of Social Psychology 1999, 29(4):435-442.
24. Evans E.M. The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2000, 46(2):221-254.
25. Evans E.M. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42(3):217-266.
26. Evans E.M., Wellman H.M. A case of stunted development? Existential reasoning is contingent on a developing theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006, 29:471-472.
27. Fenigstein A., Vanable P.A. Paranoia and self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62(1):129.
28. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005, 19(4):25-42.
29. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Bíró S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 1995, 56:165-193.
30. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 2012, 336:493-496.
31. Gervais W.M., Willard A., Norenzayan A., Henrich J. The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion 2011, 41:389-410.
32. Gray K., Jenkins A.C., Heberlein A.H., Wegner D.M. Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 108:477-479.
33. Gray K., Wegner D.M. Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010, 14(1):7-16.
34. Green M.J., Phillips M.L. Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28(3):333-342.
35. Greene E.D. The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Training 1990, 27:875-885.
36. Guthrie S.E. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion 1993, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
37. Heywood, B. T. (2010). "Meant to be": How religious beliefs, cultural religiosity, and impaired theory of mind affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
38. Heywood B.T., Bering J.M. "Meant to be": How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion Brain, and Behavior 2013, 10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888.
39. Hoekstra R.A., Vinkhuyzen A.A., Wheelwright S., Bartels M., Boomsma D.I., Baron-Cohen S., et al. The construction and validation of an abridged version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ-Short). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2011, 41(5):589-596.
40. Hutson M. The 7 laws of magical thinking: How irrational beliefs keep us happy, healthy, and sane 2012, Hudson Street Press, New York.
41. Inzlicht M., Tullett A.M., Good M. The need to believe: A neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process. Religion, Brain, and Behavior 2011, 1:192-212.
42. Irwin H.J. Belief in the paranormal: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 1993, 87(1):1-39.
43. Kay A.C., Gaucher D., McGregor I., Nash K. Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010, 14(1):37-48.
44. Kay A.C., Gaucher D., Napier J.L., Callan M.J., Laurin K. God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95(1):18.
45. Kay A.C., Moscovitch D.A., Laurin K. Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in god. Psychological Science 2010, 21(2):216-218.
46. Kelemen D. The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition 1999, 70(3):241-272.
47. Kelemen D. Function, goals and intention: Children's teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(12):461-468.
48. Kelemen D. British and American children's preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition 2003, 88(2):201-221.
49. Kelemen D. Are children "intuitive theists"?. Psychological Science 2004, 15(5):295.
50. Kelemen D., DiYanni C. Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development 2005, 6(1):3-31.
51. Kelemen D., Rosset E. The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition 2009, 111(1):138-143.
52. Kelemen D., Rottman J., Seston R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, 142(4):1074.
53. Kovács Á.M., Téglás E., Endress A.D. The social sense: Susceptibility to others' beliefs in human infants and adults. Science 2010, 330(6012):1830-1834.
54. Kray L.J., George L.G., Liljenquist K.A., Galinsky A.D., Tetlock P.E., Roese N.J. From what might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 98(1):106-118.
55. Laurin K., Kay A.C., Moscovitch D.A. On the belief in god: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44(6):1559-1562.
56. Legare C.H., Evans E.M., Rosengren K.S., Harris P.L. The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development 2012, 83:779-793.
57. Legare C.H., Gelman S.A. Bewitchment, biology, or both: The co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science 2008, 32(4):607-642.
58. Legare C.H., Visala A. Between religion and science: Integrating psychological and philosophical accounts of explanatory coexistence. Human Development 2011, 54(3):169-184.
59. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion 1980, Plenum Press, New York.
60. Lindeman M., Riekki T., Hood B.M. Is weaker inhibition associated with supernatural beliefs. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2011, 11(1-2):1-2.
61. Lindeman M., Svedholm A.M., Riekki T., Raij T., Hari R. Is it just a brick wall or a sign from the universe? An fMRI study of supernatural believers and skeptics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2012, 8(8):943-949.
62. Lupfer M.B., Brock K.F., DePaola S.J. The use of secular and religious attributions to explain everyday behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1992, 31(4):486-503.
63. Lupfer M.B., De Paola S.J., Brock K.F., Clement L. Making secular and religious attributions: The availability hypothesis revisited. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1994, 33(2):162-171.
64. Lupfer M.B., Tolliver D., Jackson M. Explaining life-altering occurrences: A test of the 'god-of-the-gaps' hypothesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1996, 35(4):379-391.
65. Morewedge C.K. Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138(4):535-545.
66. Newman G.E., Keil F.C., Kuhlmeier V.A., Wynn K. Early understandings of the link between agents and order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(40):17140-17145.
67. Norenzayan A., Gervais W.M. The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17:20-25.
68. Norenzayan A., Gervais W., Trzesniewski K. Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal God. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e36880.
69. Norenzayan A., Lee A. It was meant to happen: Explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 98(5):702-720.
70. Office for National Statistics (2011). Census: Aggregate data (England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland) [Data File]. UK Data Service Census Support. Retrieved 29.05.14. http://infuse.mimas.ac.uk.
71. Ojalehto B., Waxman S.R., Medin D.L. Teleological reasoning about nature? Intentional design or relational perspectives?. Trends in Cognitive Science 2013, 17(4):166-171.
72. Pargament K.I., Ensing D.S., Falgout K., Olsen H., Reilly B., Haitsma K.V., et al. God help me: (I): Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events. American Journal of Community Psychology 1990, 18(6):793-824.
73. Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Seli P., Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 2012, 123:335-346.
74. Pepitone A., Saffiotti L. The selectivity of nonmaterial beliefs in interpreting life events. European Journal of Social Psychology 1997, 27(1):23-35.
75. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (2012). "Nones" on the rise: One-in-five adults have no religious affiliation, October 2012 [Data File]. Retrieved 29.05.14. http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Unaffiliated/NonesOnTheRise-full.pdf.
76. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans). New York: Free Press (Original work published 1932).
77. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:879-891.
78. Riekki T., Lindeman M., Aleneff M., Halme A., Nuortimo A. Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 27(2):150-155.
79. Risen J.L., Gilovich T. Why people are reluctant to tempt fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95(2):293-307.
80. Rosset E. It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition 2008, 108(3):771-780.
81. Rosset E., Rottman J. The big "whoops!" in the study of intentional behavior: An appeal for a new framework in understanding human actions. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2014, 14:27-39.
82. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 141:423-428.
83. Shtulman A. Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories on evolution. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:170-194.
84. Slone D.J. Theological incorrectness 2004, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
85. Spilka B., Schmidt G. General attribution theory for the psychology of religion: The influence of event-character on attributions to god. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1983, 22(4):326-339.
86. Spilka B., Shaver P., Kirkpatrick L.A. A general attribution theory for the psychology of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1985, 24(2):1-20.
87. Stark R. Physiology and faith: Addressing the "universal" gender difference religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2002, 41:495-507.
88. Stephens N.M., Fryberg S.A., Markus H.R., Hamedani M.G. Who explains Hurricane Katrina and the Chilean Earthquake as an act of God? The experience of extreme hardship predicts religious meaning-making. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2013, 44(4):606-619.
89. Subbotsky E. Causal explanations of events by children and adults: Can alternative causal modes coexist in one mind?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2001, 19(1):23-45.
90. Svedholm A.M., Lindeman M. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions. British Journal of Psychology 2013, 104(3):303-319.
91. Svedholm A.M., Lindeman M., Lipsanen J. Believing in the purpose of events-why does it occur, and is it supernatural?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010, 24(2):252-265.
92. Tobacyk J.J. A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2004, 23(23):94-98.
93. Wakabayashi A., Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Goldenfeld N., Delaney J., Fine D., et al. Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 41(5):929-940.
94. Walter T., Davie G. The religiosity of women in the modern west. British Journal of Sociology 1998, 49:640-660.
95. Waytz A., Gray K., Epley N., Wegner D.M. Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(8):383-388.
96. Weeks M., Lupfer M.B. Religious attributions and proximity of influence: An investigation of direct interventions and distal explanations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2000, 39(3):348-362.
97. Wellman H.M., Gelman S.A. Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology 1992, 43:337-375.
98. Willard A.K., Norenzayan A. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purpose. Cognition 2013, 129(2):379-391.
99. Woodward A.L. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 1998, 69:1-34.
100. Woolley J.D., Cornelius C.A., Lacy W. Developmental changes in the use of supernatural explanations for unusual events. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2011, 11(3-4):311-337.
101. Young M.J., Morris M.W., Burrus J., Krishnan L., Regmi M.P. Deity and destiny: Patterns of fatalistic thinking in Christian and Hindu cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2011, 42:1032-1055.
102. Young M.J., Morris M.W. Existential meanings and cultural models: The interplay of personal and supernatural agency in American and Hindu ways of responding to uncertainty. Handbook of experimental existential psychology 2004, 215-230. Guilford Press, New York. J. Greenberg, S.L. Koole, T. Pyszczynski (Eds.).
103. Zusne L., Jones W.H. Anomalistic psychology: A study of magical thinking 1989, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.