Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories

Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders

Volumn 9781107035805, Issue , 2014, Pages 254-272

  Sutton, Robbie M ^a   Douglas, Karen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923528847     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139565417.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., and Gregory, L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637-47.
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford: Harpers.
3. Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340-53.
4. Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., Allerback, K. R., et al. (1979). Political action: mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology (rev. edn.). Cambridge University Press.
6. Bird, S. T., and Bogart, L. M. (2005). Conspiracy beliefs about HIV/AIDS and birth control among African Americans: implications for the prevention of HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 109-26.
7. Bogart, L. M., and Thorburn, S. (2006). Relationship of African Americans’ sociodemographic characteristics to belief in conspiracies about HIV/AIDS and birth control. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 1144-50.
8. Butler, L. D., Koopman, C., and Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). The psychological impact of viewing the film JFK: emotions, beliefs and political behavioral intentions. Political Psychology, 16, 237-57.
9. Christie, R., and Geis, F. I. (Eds.) (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
10. Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131-50.
11. Coady, D. (2006). Conspiracy theories: the philosophical debate. Aldershot: Ashgate.
12. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
13. Coady, D. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-96.
15. Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210-22.
16. Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 542-52.
17. Furnham, A. (2003). Beliefin a just world: research progress over the last decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795-817.
18. Goertzel, T. (1994). Beliefin conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-42.
19. Griffin, D. R. (2009). The mysterious collapse of Word Trade Center 7: Why the final official report about 9/11 is unscientific and false. Northampton, MA: Interlink.
20. Groh, D. (1987). The temptation of conspiracy theory or: why do bad things happen to good people? I. Preliminary draft of a theory of conspiracy theories. In C. F. Graumann and S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 1-13). New York: Springer.
21. Grzesiak-Feldman, M., and Ejsmont, A. (2008). Paranoia and conspiracy thinking of Jews, Arabs, Germans, and Russians in a Polish sample. Psychological Reports, 102, 884-6.
22. Hafer, C. L., and Begue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128-67.
23. Hofstadter, R. (1971). The paranoid style in American politics. In D. B. Davis (Ed.), The fear of conspiracy (pp. 2-8). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Husting, G., and Orr, M. (2007). Dangerous machinery: “conspiracy theorist” as a transpersonal strategy of exclusion. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 127-50.
25. Janoff-Bulman, R., and Yopyk, D. J. (2004). Random outcomes and valued commitments: existential dilemmas and the paradox of meaning. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, and T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 112-38). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Jolley, D., and Douglas, K. M. (in press). The social consequences of conspir- acism: exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology.
27. Kaase, M. (1971). Demoktratische Einstellung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Democratic opinion in West Germany]. In R. Wildenbman (Ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch fur Politik (vol. II, pp. 119-326). Munich: Gunter Olzog Verlag.
28. Kay, A. C., Moscovitch, D. A., and Laurin, K. (2010). Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychological Science, 21, 216-18.
29. Kay, J. (2011). Among the truthers: a journey through America’s conspiracist underground. New York: HarperCollins.
30. Kofta, M., and Sedek, G. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 40-64.
31. Krueger, J. (2000). Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli’s game revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 546-58.
32. Leman, P. J., and Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9, 18-28.
33. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The beliefin a just world: a fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
34. McCauley, C. and Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: a Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637-44.
35. McCloskey, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52, 22-45.
36. Mesoudi, A. (2009). How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa. Psychological Review, 116, 929-52.
37. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-53.
38. Monroe, B. M., and Read, S. J. (2008). A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: the ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) model. Psychological Review, 115, 733-59.
39. Parsons, S., Simmons, W., Shinhoster, F., and Kilburn, J. (1999). A test of the grapevine: an empirical examination of conspiracy theories among African Americans. Sociological Spectrum, 19, 201-22.
40. Plomin, R. S., and Post, J. M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65-89.
42. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Mackie, D. M., and Strain, L. M. (2006). Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 954-8.
43. Sapountzis, A., and Condor, S. (2013). Conspiracy accounts as intergroup theories: challenging dominant understandings of social power and political legitimacy. Political Psychology, 34, 731-52.
44. Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-68.
45. Showalter, E. (1997). Hystories: hysterical epidemics and modern culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
46. Sunstein, C. R., and Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202-27.
47. Sutton, R. M. (2010). The creative power of language in social cognition and intergroup relations. In H. Giles, S. Reid, and J. Harwood (Eds.), Dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 105-15). Language as Social Action, vol. XIII. New York: Peter Lang.
48. Sutton, R. M., and Douglas, K. M. (in preparation). Unjust world beliefs and beliefs in conspiracy theories. University of Kent.
49. Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Wilkin, K., Elder, T. J., Cole, J. M., and Stathi, S. (2008). Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 528-41.
50. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., and Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: a preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 74961.
51. Swami, V., and Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23, 560-3.
52. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., and Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443-63.
53. Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Tran, U. S., Nader, I. W., Stieger, S., and Voracek, M. (2013). Lunar lies: the impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 71-80.
54. van Prooijen, J. W., and Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: the influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109-15.
55. Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.
56. Weingart, P., Engels, A., and Pasengrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261-83.
57. Whitson, J. A., and Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115-17.
58. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767-73.