Speaking (Un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-43

  Imhoff, Roland ^a   Bruder, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conspiracy mentality; Conspiracy theories; Generalised political attitudes; Power; Prejudice; Right wing authoritarianism; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893819969     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.1930     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T. Y., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637-647. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00160
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.
3. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2011). Personality and social psychology factors explaining sexism. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 153-160. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000043
4. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5. Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324-340. DOI: 10.1002/per.746
6. Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (in press). Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ). Frontiers in Psychology.
7. Byford, J. T., & Billig, M. (2001). The emergence of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Yugoslavia during the war with NATO. Patterns of Prejudice, 35, 50-63. DOI: 10.1080/003132201128811287
8. Cohrs, C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263-276. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00071.x
9. von Collani, G. (2002). Das Konstrukt der Sozialen Dominanzorientierung als generalisierte Einstellung: Eine Replikation [The construct of Social Dominance Orientation as a generalized attitude: A replication]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 10, 263-282.
10. Crocker, J., Luthanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941-953. DOI: 10.1177/01461672992511003
11. Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289-1293. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
12. Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwartz, S. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481-494. DOI: 10.1348/014466602321149849
13. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual impact of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210-221. DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222
14. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130. DOI: 10.1002/per.614
15. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual-process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
16. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463-482. DOI: 10.1002/per.526
17. Fabbrini, S. (2004). Layers of anti-Americanism: Americanization, American unilateralism and anti-Americanism in a European perspective. European Journal of American Culture, 23, 79-94. DOI: 10.1386/ejac.23.2.79/0
18. Feather, N. T. (1996). Reaction to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.571
19. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
20. Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x
21. Glatzer, W., & Zapf, W. (1984). Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik: objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlbefinden. Frankfurt: Campus.
22. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-742. DOI: 10.2307/3791630
23. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
24. Graumann, C. F., & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), (1987). Changing conceptions of conspiracy. New York, NY: Springer.
25. Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211432765
26. Imhoff, R., & Banse, R. (2009). Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice: The case of secondary anti-Semitism. Psychological Science, 20, 1443-1447. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02457.x
27. Imhoff, R., & Decker, O. (2013). Verschwörungsmentalität als Weltbild [Conpiracy mentality as a world view]. In O. Decker, J. Kiess, & E. Brähler (Hrsg.) Rechtsextremismus der Mitte (S. 130-145). Wiesbaden: Psychosozial Verlag.
28. Imhoff, R., & Recker, J. (2012). Differentiating Islamophobia: Introducing a new scale to measure Islamoprejudice and Secular Islam Critique. Political Psychology, 33, 811-824. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00911.x
29. Inglehart, R. (1987). Extremist political positions and perceptions of conspiracy: Even paranoids have real enemies. In C. F. Graumann, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 231-244). New York, NY: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_14
30. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
31. Kofta, M., & Sedek, M. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systematic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 40-64.
32. Krahé, B., & Möller, I. (2004). Playing violent electronic games, hostile attribution bias and aggression-related norms in German adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 53-69.
33. Krampen, G. (1991). Fragebogen zu Kompetenz- und Kontrollüberzeugungen (FKK). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
34. Legge, S., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2008). Social structural effects on the level and development of the individual experience of anomie in the German population. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 248-267.
35. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
36. Mackey, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1977). Dimensions of adolescent alienation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 219-232. DOI: 10.1177/014662167700100208
37. McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637-644. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637
38. McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453-477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x
39. Moscovici, S. (1987). The conspiracy mentality. In C. F. Graumann, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 151-169). New York, NY: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_9
40. Newheiser, A., Farias, M., & Tausch, N. (2011). The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1007-1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.011
41. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
42. O'Connor, B. (Ed.), (2007). Anti-Americanism. Volume 4: In the 21st century. Oxford, UK: Greenwood.
43. O'Higgins, N., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Education and employment opportunities for the Roma. Comparative Economic Studies, 48, 6-19. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100147
44. Parsons, S., Simmons, W., Shinhoster, F., & Kilburn, J. (1999). A test of the grapevine: An empirical investigation of conspiracy theories among African Americans. Sociological Spectrum, 19, 201-222. DOI: 10.1080/027321799280235
45. Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253-1265. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1253
46. Popper, K. (1966). The open society and its enemies (5th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
48. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Development and validation of an economic inventory for assessment of the five factors of personality]. Diagnostica, 51, 195-206. DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
49. Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336-353. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
50. Schlink, S., & Walther, E. (2007). Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit [Short and sweet: A German short scale to measure need for cognitive closure]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 153-161. DOI: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.3.153
51. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High SDO leaders and high RWA followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67-81. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.67
52. Stempel, C., Hargrove, T., & Stempel, G. H. (2007). Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 353-372. DOI: 10.1177/107769900708400210
53. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409-426. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00026-0
54. Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434-494. DOI: 10.1037/a0017457
55. Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
56. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 49-61. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1583
57. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443-463. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
58. Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behaviour: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148. DOI: 10.1037/a0022728
59. Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1992). A revised death anxiety scale. Death Studies, 16, 517-531. DOI: 10.1080/07481189208252595
60. Traynor, I. (23 April 2009). Gypsies suffer widespread racism in European Union. London, UK: Guardian. Retrieved October 19, 2011 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/23/eu-roma-racism-discrimination
61. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219-232. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610369336
62. Whitley, B. R. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126
63. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115-117. DOI: 10.1126/science.1159845
64. Wood, M., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychology and Personality Science. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611434786
65. Young, M. J., Launer, M. K., & Austin, C. C. (1990). The need for evaluative criteria. Argumentation and Advocacy, 26, 89-107.
66. Zarefsky, D. (1984). Conspiracy arguments in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 21, 63-75.