Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories

Cognition

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 572-585

  Swami, Viren ^a   Voracek, Martin ^b   Stieger, Stefan ^b,c   Tran, Ulrich S ^b   Furnham, Adrian ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analytic thinking; Conspiracy theories; Experiential thinking; Open mindedness; Thinking dispositions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; CRITICAL THINKING; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POPULATION; THINKING; WELLBEING; ADOLESCENT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907699791     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Abalakina-Paap M., Stephan W.G., Craig T., Gregory W.L. Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology 1999, 20:637-647. 10.1111/0162-895X.00160.
2. Alter A.L., Oppenheimer D.M. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychological Review 2009, 13:219-235. 10.1177/1088868309341564.
3. Alter A.L., Oppenheimer D.M., Epley N. Disfluency prompts analytic thinking - But not always greater accuracy: Response to Thompson. Cognition 2013, 128:252-255. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.006.
4. Alter A.L., Oppenheimer D.M., Epley N., Eyre R.N. Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:569-576. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569.
5. Baer M.D. An enemy old and new: The Dönme, anti-Semitism, and conspiracy theories in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. Jewish Quarterly Review 2013, 103:523-555. 10.1353/jqp.2013.0033.
6. Bale J.M. Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice 2007, 41:45-60. 10.1080/00313220601118751.
7. Banas J.A., Miller G. Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research 2013, 39:184-207. 10.1111/hcre.12000.
8. Baron J. Thinking and deciding 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York. 4th ed.
9. Barron D., Morgan K., Towell T., Altemeyer B., Swami V. Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences 2014, 70:156-159. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040.
10. Beatty E.L., Thompson V.A. Effects of perspective and belief on analytic reasoning in a scientific reasoning task. Thinking and Reasoning 2012, 18:441-460. 10.1080/13546783.2012.687892.
11. Bilewicz M., Winiewski M., Kofta M., Wójcik A. Harmful ideas: The structure and consequences of anti-Semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology 2013, 34:821-839. 10.1111/pops.12024.
12. Blair J.A. The Keegstra affair: A test case for critical thinking. Groundwork in the theory of argumentation: Selected papers of J. Anthony Blair 2012, 13-22. Springer, New York, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_2. C.W. Tindale (Ed.).
13. Bost P.R., Prunier S.G. Rationality in conspiracy beliefs: The role of perceived motive. Psychological Reports 2013, 113:118-128. 10.2466/17.04/PR0.113x17z0.
14. Brotherton R., French C.C. Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2014, 28:238-248. 10.1002/acp.2995.
15. Brotherton R., French C.C., Pickering A.D. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:279. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279.
16. Bruder M., Haffke P., Neave N., Nouripanah N., Imhoff R. Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:279. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279.
17. Butler L.D., Koopman C., Zimbardo P.G. The psychological impact of the film JFK. Political Psychology 1995, 16:237-257.
18. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42:116-131. 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.
19. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., Jarvis W.B. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 56:81-105. 10.1037/0033-2909.2.197.
20. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 39:752-756. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
21. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control 1989, 212-252. Guilford, New York. J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
22. Clarke S. Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2002, 32:131-150. 10.1177/004931032002001.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
24. Darwin H., Neave N., Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences 2011, 50:1289-1293. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027.
25. De Neys W., Glumicic T. Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of reasoning. Cognition 2008, 106:1248-1299. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002.
26. Denes-Raj V., Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave 10.1037/0022-against their better judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:819-829. _rfdoi 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819.
27. Diemand-Yauman C., Oppenheimer D.M., Vaughan E.B. Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition 2011, 118:111-115. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012.
28. Erickson T.A., Mattson M.E. From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20:540-552. 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1.
29. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71:390-405. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390.
30. Ford C.L., Wallace S.P., Newman S.P., Lee S.-J., Cunningham W.E. Belief in AIDS-related conspiracy theories and mistrust in the government: Relationship with HIV testing among at-risk older adults. The Gerontologist 2013, 53:973-984. 10.1093/geront/gns192.
31. Furnham A. Commercial conspiracy theories: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:379. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00379.
32. Gaston G.B., Alleyne-Green B. The impact of African Americans' beliefs about HIV medical care on treatment adherence: A systematic review and recommendations for interventions. AIDS and Behavior 2013, 17:31-40. 10.1007/s10451-012-0323-x.
33. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 2012, 336:493-496. 10.1126/science.1215467.
34. Grzesiak-Feldman M. The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology 2013, 32:100-118. 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6.
35. Groh D. The temptation of conspiracy theory, or: Why do bad things happen to good people?. Changing conceptions of conspiracy 1987, 1-37. Springer, New York. C.F. Graumann, S. Moscovici (Eds.).
36. Hardin R. The crippled epistemology of extremism. Political extremism and rationality 2002, 3-22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, R. Wintrobe (Eds.).
37. Hutchinson A.B., Begley E.B., Sullivan P., Clark H.A., Boyett B.C., Kellerman S.E. Conspiracy beliefs and trust in information about HIV/AIDS among minority men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2007, 45:603-605. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318115126.
38. Imhoff R., Bruder M. Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality 2013, 28:25-43. 10.1002/per.1930.
39. Jolley D., Douglas K.M. The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology 2014, 105:35-56. 10.1111/bjop.12018.
40. Jolley D., Douglas K.M. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One 2014, 9:e89177. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177.
41. Kata A. A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination information on the Internet. Vaccine 2010, 28:1709-1716. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022.
42. Kokis J.V., Macpherson R., Toplak M.E., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2002, 83:26-52. 10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00121-2.
43. Kruglanski A.W. Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior 1990, Vol. 2:333-368. Guilford, New York.
44. Leman P.J. The born conspiracy. New Scientist 2007, 195:35-38. 10.1016/S0262-4079(07)61774-6.
45. Leman P.J., Cinnirella M. A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review 2007, 9:18-28.
46. Leman P.J., Cinnirella M. Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 27:378. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378.
47. Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One 2013, 8:e75637. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637.
48. Lewandowsky S., Oberauer K., Gignac G.E. NASA faked the moon landing - Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science 2013, 24:622-633. 10.1177/0956797612457686.
49. Marsh, K. R., & Pastor, D. A. (2011, May). Stanovich and West's (2007) Actively Open-Minded Thinking scale: An examination of factor structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Washington, D.C.
50. Mashuri A., Zaduqisti E. The role of social identification, intergroup threat, and out-group derogation in explaining belief in conspiracy theory about terrorism in Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology 2014, 3:35-50. 10.5861/ijrsp.2013.446.
51. McHoskey J.W. Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1995, 17:395-409. 10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7.
52. Miller S. Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques: A rhetorical analysis of the TWA flight 800 conspiracy theories. Argumentation and Advocacy 2002, 39:40-56. 10.1177/0267323111433566.
53. Newheiser A.-K., Farias M., Tausch N. The functioning nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of beliefs in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences 2011, 51:1007-1011. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.011.
54. Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi I., Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review 2001, 108:291-310. 10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291.
55. Norris P., Epstein S. An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality 2011, 79:1043-1079. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x.
56. Oliver J.E., Wood T.J. Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science 2014, 10.1111/ajps.12084.
57. Oliver J.E., Wood T.J. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine 2014, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190.
58. Pacini R., Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76:972-987. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972.
59. Pacini R., Muir F., Epstein S. Depressive realism from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1056-1068. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.1056.
60. Peltier J.W., Schibrowsky J.A. Need for cognition, advertisement viewing time, and memory for advertising stimuli. Advances in Consumer Research 1994, 21:244-250.
61. Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Seli P., Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 2012, 123:335-346. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003.
62. Perkins D.N., Tishman S., Ritchhart R., Donis K., Andrade A. Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review 2000, 12:269-293. 10.1023/A:1009031605464.
63. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research 1984, 11:668-672.
64. Raab M.H., Auer N., Ortlieb S.A., Carbon C.-C. The Sarrazin effect: The presence of absurd statements in conspiracy theories makes canonical information less plausible. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:453. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00453.
65. Robins R.S., Post J.M. Political paranoia 1997, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
66. Roets A., van Hiel A. Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:266-280. 10.1177/0146167206294744.
67. Roets A., van Hiel A. Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences 2011, 50:90-94. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.
68. Sá W.C., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91:497-510. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3497.
69. Sapountzis A., Condor S. Conspiracy accounts as intergroup theories: Challenging dominant understandings of social power and political legitimacy. Political Psychology 2013, 34:731-752. 10.1111/pops.12015.
70. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 141:423-428. 10.1037/a0025391.
71. Song H., Schwarz N. Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition 2008, 26:791-799. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791.
72. Song H., Schwarz N. If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science 2008, 19:986-988. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x.
73. Srull T.K., Wyer R.S. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:1660-1672. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660.
74. Srull T.K., Wyer R.S. Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 38:841-856. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.841.
75. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 89:342-357. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342.
76. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 38:349-385. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0700.
77. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-665. 10.1017/S0140525X00003435.
78. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking and Reasoning 2007, 13:225-247. 10.1080/13546780600780796.
79. Sunstein C.R., Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy 2009, 17:202-227. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
80. Stieger S., Gumhalter N., Tran U.S., Voracek M., Swami V. Girl in the cellar: A repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:297. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00297.
81. Swami V. Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:280. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280.
82. Swami V., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A. Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010, 24:749-761. 10.1002/acp.1583.
83. Swami V., Coles R. The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist 2010, 23:560-563.
84. Swami V., Coles R., Stieger S., Pietschnig J., Furnham A., Rehim S., et al. Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology 2011, 102:443-463. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x.
85. Swami V., Furnham A. Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart. The Journal of General Psychology 2012, 139:244-259. 10.1080/00221309.2012.697932.
86. Swami V., Furnham A. Political paranoia and conspiracy theories. Power politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders 2014, 218-236. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.-P. Prooijen, P.A.M. van Lange (Eds.).
87. Swami V., Nader I.W., Pietschnig J., Stieger S., Tran U.S., Voracek M. Personality and individual difference correlates of attitudes toward human rights and civil liberties. Personality and Individual Differences 2012, 53:443-447. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.015.
88. Swami V., Pietschnig J., Tran U.S., Nader I.W., Stieger S., Voracek M. Lunar lies: The impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 27:71-80. 10.1002/acp.2873.
89. Thompson V.A., Prowse Turner J.A., Pennycook G. Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology 2011, 63:107-140. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.011.
90. Thompson V.A., Prowse Turner J.A., Pennycook G., Ball L.J., Brack H., et al. The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition 2013, 128:237-251. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012.
91. Uhlmann E.L., Poehlman T.A., Tannenbaum D., Bargh J.A. Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47:312-320. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.013.
92. van Prooijen J.-W., Jostmann N.B. Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology 2013, 43:109-115. (10.1002.ejsp.1922).
93. Warner B.R., Neville-Shepard R. Echoes of a conspiracy: Birthers, truthers, and the cultivation of extremism. Communication Quarterly 2014, 62:1-17. 10.1080/01463373.2013.822407.
94. West R.F., Toplak M.E., Stanovich K.E. Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100:930-941. 10.1037/a0012842.
95. Wood M.J., Douglas K.M. "What about Building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:409. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409.
96. Wood M.J., Douglas K.M., Sutton R.M. Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012, 3:767-773. 10.1177/1948550611434786.